The Effect of Any Willing Provider and Freedom of Choice Laws on Prescription Drug Expenditures

Jonathan Klick, Joshua D. Wright
{"title":"The Effect of Any Willing Provider and Freedom of Choice Laws on Prescription Drug Expenditures","authors":"Jonathan Klick, Joshua D. Wright","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2183279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) potentially lower costs associated with prescription drugs through increased bargaining power with manufacturers. PBMs engage in selective contracting with pharmacies which has the potential to reduce retail competition, leading to increased prices. Proponents of \"Any Willing Provider (AWP)\" and \"Freedom of Choice (FOC)\" laws limiting this selective contracting claim increased retail competition will lower prescription drug spending. Examining the passage of such laws over the period 1991–2009, we find that AWP laws increase spending on prescription drugs by ~5% beyond any pre-existing trends in spending while FOC laws have no significant effect.","PeriodicalId":410798,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Legal Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2183279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) potentially lower costs associated with prescription drugs through increased bargaining power with manufacturers. PBMs engage in selective contracting with pharmacies which has the potential to reduce retail competition, leading to increased prices. Proponents of "Any Willing Provider (AWP)" and "Freedom of Choice (FOC)" laws limiting this selective contracting claim increased retail competition will lower prescription drug spending. Examining the passage of such laws over the period 1991–2009, we find that AWP laws increase spending on prescription drugs by ~5% beyond any pre-existing trends in spending while FOC laws have no significant effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
任何自愿提供者和自由选择法对处方药支出的影响
药房福利管理(PBMs)通过提高与制造商的议价能力,有可能降低处方药的相关成本。药品福利管理机构与药店签订选择性合同,这有可能减少零售竞争,导致价格上涨。“任何自愿提供者(AWP)”和“选择自由(FOC)”法律的支持者限制这种选择性合同,声称增加零售竞争将降低处方药支出。考察1991-2009年期间此类法律的通过,我们发现AWP法律使处方药支出比任何先前存在的支出趋势增加了约5%,而FOC法律没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Gets Medication-assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder, and Does It Reduce Overdose Risk? Evidence from the Rhode Island All-payer Claims Database The Architecture Behind the Malpractice Concept Guidelines Tax Evasion and Illicit Cigarettes in California: Part I – Survey Evidence on Current Behavior Regulatory Exclusivity Revision: Working to Achieve Greater Innovation in Approved New Molecular Entities Leviathan in the Commons: Biomedical Data and the State
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1