Still Up to the Challenge? International Trade Issues Facing the Basel Convention as it Enters its Third Decade

R. Powell
{"title":"Still Up to the Challenge? International Trade Issues Facing the Basel Convention as it Enters its Third Decade","authors":"R. Powell","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1758853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Basel Convention is inarguably a noble effort to combat the grave threat to human and environmental health posed by hazardous wastes, but it has failed in at least one of its fundamental objectives: to minimize the movement of hazardous waste across international borders. Is the framework of the Convention sufficient to achieve its goals as well tackle emerging issues in international trade?The first half of the paper provides generous background information about the Basel Convention including: - its origins and purpose - a case study of the infamous Khian Sea incident - the organization and scope of the treaty - how the treaty employs trade measures to minimize trade in hazardous waste - how the Convention approaches compliance and dispute resolution - the future implementation of the Convention via the New Strategic Framework to be addressed at COP10 - proposed provisions including the Basel Ban Amendment and the Protocol on Liability and Compensation.The second half of the paper discusses the Basel Convention's strengths and analyzes its shortcomings. It also suggests improvements for the Convention to succeed in its original and assumed objectives. Topics addressed include: - the incorporation the Precautionary Principle into the treaty - inconsistent standards in Annex IX - the circumvention of the convention by traders of e-waste and ship breaking - hazardous wastes outside of the Convention such as ship wastes and radioactive waste - the failure of the treaty's trade measures to achieve its objectives - the potential conflict of the treaty's trade measures with the WTO Agreements - inadequacies of the Basel Compliance Mechanism - the lack of a dispute settlement system.After 20 years, the purpose of the Basel Convention remains as relevant as ever, but its framework, while not ill-conceived, has proven insufficient. Unfortunately, the New Strategic Framework fails to adequately address most of Convention’s most significant weaknesses. Ratification of the Ban Amendment and Liability Protocol in addition to significant tweaks, particularly in the arena of compliance, will likely afford the Basel Convention an opportunity to position itself to face the emerging issues of international trade and achieve a reduction in the transboundary movement of hazardous waste over its third decade.","PeriodicalId":375754,"journal":{"name":"Public International Law eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public International Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1758853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Basel Convention is inarguably a noble effort to combat the grave threat to human and environmental health posed by hazardous wastes, but it has failed in at least one of its fundamental objectives: to minimize the movement of hazardous waste across international borders. Is the framework of the Convention sufficient to achieve its goals as well tackle emerging issues in international trade?The first half of the paper provides generous background information about the Basel Convention including: - its origins and purpose - a case study of the infamous Khian Sea incident - the organization and scope of the treaty - how the treaty employs trade measures to minimize trade in hazardous waste - how the Convention approaches compliance and dispute resolution - the future implementation of the Convention via the New Strategic Framework to be addressed at COP10 - proposed provisions including the Basel Ban Amendment and the Protocol on Liability and Compensation.The second half of the paper discusses the Basel Convention's strengths and analyzes its shortcomings. It also suggests improvements for the Convention to succeed in its original and assumed objectives. Topics addressed include: - the incorporation the Precautionary Principle into the treaty - inconsistent standards in Annex IX - the circumvention of the convention by traders of e-waste and ship breaking - hazardous wastes outside of the Convention such as ship wastes and radioactive waste - the failure of the treaty's trade measures to achieve its objectives - the potential conflict of the treaty's trade measures with the WTO Agreements - inadequacies of the Basel Compliance Mechanism - the lack of a dispute settlement system.After 20 years, the purpose of the Basel Convention remains as relevant as ever, but its framework, while not ill-conceived, has proven insufficient. Unfortunately, the New Strategic Framework fails to adequately address most of Convention’s most significant weaknesses. Ratification of the Ban Amendment and Liability Protocol in addition to significant tweaks, particularly in the arena of compliance, will likely afford the Basel Convention an opportunity to position itself to face the emerging issues of international trade and achieve a reduction in the transboundary movement of hazardous waste over its third decade.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
还能接受挑战吗?《巴塞尔公约》进入第三个十年面临的国际贸易问题
《巴塞尔公约》无疑是一项崇高的努力,旨在消除危险废物对人类和环境健康构成的严重威胁,但它至少未能实现一个基本目标:尽量减少危险废物的跨国界流动。《公约》的框架是否足以实现其目标并解决国际贸易中新出现的问题?本文的前半部分提供了大量关于巴塞尔公约的背景资料,包括:-条约的起源和目的-臭名昭著的海事件的案例研究-条约的组织和范围-条约如何采用贸易措施尽量减少危险废物的贸易-公约如何处理合规和争端解决-通过第十届缔约方会议将讨论的新战略框架对公约的未来实施-拟议的条款包括巴塞尔禁令修正案和责任和赔偿议定书。论文的第二部分讨论了巴塞尔公约的优点,并分析了其不足。它还建议作出改进,使《公约》能够成功地实现其最初和假定的目标。讨论的主题包括:-预防原则合并到条约不一致的标准附件IX -公约的规避电子垃圾的交易员和拆船公约之外的危险废物如船舶废物和放射性废物——条约的贸易措施未能实现其目标——条约的潜在冲突的贸易措施与世贸组织协议——巴塞尔合规机制的不足——缺乏争端解决系统。20年后,《巴塞尔公约》的宗旨仍然与以往一样重要,但其框架虽然不是考虑不周,但已被证明是不够的。不幸的是,新战略框架未能充分解决《公约》的大多数最重大弱点。批准《禁令修正案和责任议定书》,加上特别在遵守方面的重大调整,可能使《巴塞尔公约》有机会面对新出现的国际贸易问题,并在其第三个十年中减少危险废物的越境转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Dual‐Nature Thesis: Which Dualism? Legality and the Legal Relation Soldiers as Public Officials: A Moral Justification for Combatant Immunity A Pragmatic Reconstruction of Law's Claim to Authority Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1