The New Social Media Paradox: A Symbol of Self-Determination or a Boon for Big Brother?

Sara M. Smyth
{"title":"The New Social Media Paradox: A Symbol of Self-Determination or a Boon for Big Brother?","authors":"Sara M. Smyth","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2122939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past ten years or so, mobile phone and Internet technologies have been instrumental in nearly every instance where people have gathered to demand political reform. With the help of ‘new social media’ applications, like Facebook and Twitter, Internet and mobile phone users can conduct real-time exchanges with millions of people across the globe. Following the Introduction, this Article begins, in Part II, with a discussion of how these tools were used by protesters around the world in 2011. Part III discusses how the same tools were used by governments, both democratic and authoritarian, to respond to the violence and mayhem during that year. In Part IV, I turn to a discussion of the relevant policy concerns, first in the American, then the Canadian, legal contexts. It is significant that Canada is the first country to complete an extensive investigation into Facebook’s privacy practices. As a result, Facebook users across the world now enjoy stronger privacy protections for their personal information, in terms of how it is collected, used and disclosed. In conclusion, in Part V, I note that this case has important implications for other online social networking sites, even those based in other countries, which are collecting and using the personal information of Canadians in a way that does not comport with Canadian privacy laws.","PeriodicalId":106035,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights & the Global Economy eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights & the Global Economy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2122939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the past ten years or so, mobile phone and Internet technologies have been instrumental in nearly every instance where people have gathered to demand political reform. With the help of ‘new social media’ applications, like Facebook and Twitter, Internet and mobile phone users can conduct real-time exchanges with millions of people across the globe. Following the Introduction, this Article begins, in Part II, with a discussion of how these tools were used by protesters around the world in 2011. Part III discusses how the same tools were used by governments, both democratic and authoritarian, to respond to the violence and mayhem during that year. In Part IV, I turn to a discussion of the relevant policy concerns, first in the American, then the Canadian, legal contexts. It is significant that Canada is the first country to complete an extensive investigation into Facebook’s privacy practices. As a result, Facebook users across the world now enjoy stronger privacy protections for their personal information, in terms of how it is collected, used and disclosed. In conclusion, in Part V, I note that this case has important implications for other online social networking sites, even those based in other countries, which are collecting and using the personal information of Canadians in a way that does not comport with Canadian privacy laws.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的社交媒体悖论:自决的象征还是老大哥的福音?
在过去十年左右的时间里,手机和互联网技术几乎在人们聚集要求政治改革的每一个场合都发挥了重要作用。在Facebook和Twitter等“新型社交媒体”应用的帮助下,互联网和手机用户可以与全球数百万人进行实时交流。在引言之后,本文在第二部分开始讨论2011年世界各地的抗议者如何使用这些工具。第三部分讨论了民主和专制政府如何使用同样的工具来应对那一年的暴力和混乱。在第四部分,我转而讨论相关的政策问题,首先在美国,然后在加拿大,法律背景下。重要的是,加拿大是第一个完成对Facebook隐私行为广泛调查的国家。因此,就个人信息的收集、使用和披露方式而言,世界各地的Facebook用户现在享有更强的隐私保护。总之,在第五部分中,我注意到这个案例对其他在线社交网站有重要的影响,即使是那些总部设在其他国家的网站,它们以不符合加拿大隐私法的方式收集和使用加拿大人的个人信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Protection Instruments and Women Workers in the Informal Economy: A Southern African Perspective Using the Risk-Based Approach To Curb Modern Slavery in the Supply Chain: The Anglo American and Marks and Spencer Example From Creative Destruction to Destructive Creation Economic Analysis of Ethnic Conflicts Why Is Law Central to Public Policy Process in Global South?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1