Disclosures in Privacy Policies: Does 'Notice and Consent' Work?

R. Bailey, Smriti Parsheera, F. Rahman, R. Sane
{"title":"Disclosures in Privacy Policies: Does 'Notice and Consent' Work?","authors":"R. Bailey, Smriti Parsheera, F. Rahman, R. Sane","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3328289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evaluates the quality of privacy policies of five popular online services in India from the perspective of access and readability. The paper ask – do the policies have specific, unambiguous and clear provisions that lend themselves to easy comprehension? The paper has also conducted a survey among college students to evaluate how much do users typically understand of what they are signing up for. The paper also finds that the policies studied are poorly drafted, and often seem to serve as check-the-box compliance of expected privacy disclosures. Survey respondents do not score very highly on the privacy policy quiz. The respondents fared the worst on policies that had the most unspecified terms, and on policies that were long. Respondents were also unable to understand terms such as “third party†, “affiliate†and “business-partner†. The results suggest that for consent to work, the information offered to individuals has to be better drafted and designed.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"49 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3328289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper evaluates the quality of privacy policies of five popular online services in India from the perspective of access and readability. The paper ask – do the policies have specific, unambiguous and clear provisions that lend themselves to easy comprehension? The paper has also conducted a survey among college students to evaluate how much do users typically understand of what they are signing up for. The paper also finds that the policies studied are poorly drafted, and often seem to serve as check-the-box compliance of expected privacy disclosures. Survey respondents do not score very highly on the privacy policy quiz. The respondents fared the worst on policies that had the most unspecified terms, and on policies that were long. Respondents were also unable to understand terms such as “third party†, “affiliate†and “business-partner†. The results suggest that for consent to work, the information offered to individuals has to be better drafted and designed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
隐私政策的披露:“通知和同意”有效吗?
本文从可访问性和可读性的角度对印度五种流行的在线服务的隐私政策质量进行了评估。论文问:这些政策是否有具体、明确和明确的条款,便于理解?该报还在大学生中进行了一项调查,以评估用户通常对他们注册的内容了解多少。这篇论文还发现,所研究的政策起草得很差,而且往往似乎是对预期的隐私披露的遵守。受访者在隐私政策测试中得分不高。受访者在条款不明确的政策和期限长的政策上表现最差。受访者也无法理解诸如€œthird party €、€œaffiliateâ€和€œbusiness-partnerâ€等术语。研究结果表明,为了获得工作的同意,必须更好地起草和设计提供给个人的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Responses to Cross-border Central Bank Digital Currencies – Assessing the Transborder Effects of Digital Yuan Artificial Intelligence in the Internet of Health Things: Is the Solution to AI Privacy More AI? Comments on GDPR Enforcement EDPB Decision 01/020 Privacy Rights and Data Security: GDPR and Personal Data Driven Markets Big Boss is Watching You! The Right to Privacy of Employees in the Context of Workplace Surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1