Understanding Social Media Logic

J. V. van Dijck, T. Poell
{"title":"Understanding Social Media Logic","authors":"J. V. van Dijck, T. Poell","doi":"10.17645/MAC.V1I1.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade, social media platforms have penetrated deeply into the mech­anics of everyday life, affecting people's informal interactions, as well as institutional structures and professional routines. Far from being neutral platforms for everyone, social media have changed the conditions and rules of social interaction. In this article, we examine the intricate dynamic between social media platforms, mass media, users, and social institutions by calling attention to social media logic—the norms, strategies, mechanisms, and economies—underpin­ning its dynamics. This logic will be considered in light of what has been identified as mass me­dia logic, which has helped spread the media's powerful discourse outside its institutional boundaries. Theorizing social media logic, we identify four grounding principles—programmabil­ity, popularity, connectivity, and datafication—and argue that these principles become increas­ingly entangled with mass media logic. The logic of social media, rooted in these grounding principles and strategies, is gradually invading all areas of public life. Besides print news and broadcasting, it also affects law and order, social activism, politics, and so forth. Therefore, its sustaining logic and widespread dissemination deserve to be scrutinized in detail in order to better understand its impact in various domains. Concentrating on the tactics and strategies at work in social media logic, we reassess the constellation of power relationships in which social practices unfold, raising questions such as: How does social media logic modify or enhance ex­isting mass media logic? And how is this new media logic exported beyond the boundaries of (social or mass) media proper? The underlying principles, tactics, and strategies may be relat­ively simple to identify, but it is much harder to map the complex connections between plat­forms that distribute this logic: users that employ them, technologies that drive them, economic structures that scaffold them, and institutional bodies that incorporate them.","PeriodicalId":369795,"journal":{"name":"Writing Technologies eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"898","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Technologies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17645/MAC.V1I1.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 898

Abstract

Over the past decade, social media platforms have penetrated deeply into the mech­anics of everyday life, affecting people's informal interactions, as well as institutional structures and professional routines. Far from being neutral platforms for everyone, social media have changed the conditions and rules of social interaction. In this article, we examine the intricate dynamic between social media platforms, mass media, users, and social institutions by calling attention to social media logic—the norms, strategies, mechanisms, and economies—underpin­ning its dynamics. This logic will be considered in light of what has been identified as mass me­dia logic, which has helped spread the media's powerful discourse outside its institutional boundaries. Theorizing social media logic, we identify four grounding principles—programmabil­ity, popularity, connectivity, and datafication—and argue that these principles become increas­ingly entangled with mass media logic. The logic of social media, rooted in these grounding principles and strategies, is gradually invading all areas of public life. Besides print news and broadcasting, it also affects law and order, social activism, politics, and so forth. Therefore, its sustaining logic and widespread dissemination deserve to be scrutinized in detail in order to better understand its impact in various domains. Concentrating on the tactics and strategies at work in social media logic, we reassess the constellation of power relationships in which social practices unfold, raising questions such as: How does social media logic modify or enhance ex­isting mass media logic? And how is this new media logic exported beyond the boundaries of (social or mass) media proper? The underlying principles, tactics, and strategies may be relat­ively simple to identify, but it is much harder to map the complex connections between plat­forms that distribute this logic: users that employ them, technologies that drive them, economic structures that scaffold them, and institutional bodies that incorporate them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解社交媒体逻辑
在过去的十年里,社交媒体平台已经深入渗透到日常生活的机制中,影响着人们的非正式互动,也影响着制度结构和职业惯例。社交媒体远不是每个人的中立平台,它改变了社会互动的条件和规则。在本文中,我们通过关注社会媒体逻辑——规范、策略、机制和经济——来审视社会媒体平台、大众媒体、用户和社会机构之间错综复杂的动态关系。这一逻辑将根据大众媒介逻辑来考虑,大众媒介逻辑有助于将媒体的强大话语传播到其制度边界之外。将社会媒体逻辑理论化,我们确定了四个基本原则——可编程性、受欢迎程度、连通性和数据化——并认为这些原则与大众媒体逻辑日益纠缠在一起。根植于这些基本原则和策略的社交媒体逻辑,正逐渐侵入公共生活的各个领域。除了印刷新闻和广播,它还影响法律和秩序、社会行动主义、政治等等。因此,它的持续逻辑和广泛传播值得详细审查,以便更好地了解它在各个领域的影响。专注于社交媒体逻辑中起作用的战术和策略,我们重新评估了社会实践中展现的权力关系星座,提出了以下问题:社交媒体逻辑如何修改或增强现有的大众媒体逻辑?这种新媒体逻辑是如何输出到(社会或大众)媒体之外的?潜在的原则、战术和战略可能相对容易识别,但要映射分布这种逻辑的平台之间的复杂联系要困难得多:使用它们的用户、驱动它们的技术、支撑它们的经济结构和整合它们的机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developments in MOOC Technologies and Participation Since 2012: Changes Since 'The Year of the MOOC' Optimizing Video for Learning: A Case Study-Based Primer of Informal, Educational, Digital Video Best Practices Swimming with Alphago The Fashionable Functions Reloaded: An Updated Google Ngram View of Trends in Functional Differentiation (1800-2000) Keeping Internet Users in the Know or in the Dark: An Analysis of the Data Privacy Transparency of Canadian Internet Carriers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1