Public checkins versus private queries: measuring and evaluating spatial preference

James Caverlee, Zhiyuan Cheng, Wai Gen Yee, Roger Liew, Yuan Liang
{"title":"Public checkins versus private queries: measuring and evaluating spatial preference","authors":"James Caverlee, Zhiyuan Cheng, Wai Gen Yee, Roger Liew, Yuan Liang","doi":"10.1145/2442796.2442806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the spatial preference of mobile and web users is of great significance to creating and improving location-based recommendation systems, travel planners, search engines, and other emerging mobile applications. However, traditional sources of spatial preference -- which reflect the patterns of geo-spatial interest of large numbers of users -- have typically been expensive to collect, proprietary, and unavailable for widespread use. In this paper, we investigate the viability of new publicly-available geospatial information to capture spatial preference. Concretely, we compare a set of 35 million publicly shared check-ins voluntarily generated by users of a popular location sharing service with a set of over 400 million private query logs recorded by a commercial hotel search engine. Although generated by users with fundamentally different intentions, we find common conclusions may be drawn from both data sources -- (i) that the relative geo-spatial \"footprint\" of different locations is surprisingly consistent across both; (ii) that methods to identify significant locations results in similar conclusions; and (iii) that similar performance may be achieved for automatically identifying groups of related locations. These results indicate the viability of publicly shared location information to complement (and replace, in some cases), privately held location information.","PeriodicalId":107369,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Location-based Social Networks","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Location-based Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2442796.2442806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the spatial preference of mobile and web users is of great significance to creating and improving location-based recommendation systems, travel planners, search engines, and other emerging mobile applications. However, traditional sources of spatial preference -- which reflect the patterns of geo-spatial interest of large numbers of users -- have typically been expensive to collect, proprietary, and unavailable for widespread use. In this paper, we investigate the viability of new publicly-available geospatial information to capture spatial preference. Concretely, we compare a set of 35 million publicly shared check-ins voluntarily generated by users of a popular location sharing service with a set of over 400 million private query logs recorded by a commercial hotel search engine. Although generated by users with fundamentally different intentions, we find common conclusions may be drawn from both data sources -- (i) that the relative geo-spatial "footprint" of different locations is surprisingly consistent across both; (ii) that methods to identify significant locations results in similar conclusions; and (iii) that similar performance may be achieved for automatically identifying groups of related locations. These results indicate the viability of publicly shared location information to complement (and replace, in some cases), privately held location information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共签到与私人查询:测量和评估空间偏好
了解移动用户和网络用户的空间偏好对于创建和完善基于位置的推荐系统、旅行计划、搜索引擎和其他新兴的移动应用程序具有重要意义。然而,传统的空间偏好来源——它反映了大量用户的地理空间兴趣模式——通常是昂贵的,专有的,并且无法广泛使用。在本文中,我们研究了新的公开可用的地理空间信息来捕捉空间偏好的可行性。具体地说,我们比较了一个流行位置共享服务用户自愿生成的一组3500万公开共享的签到信息,以及一个商业酒店搜索引擎记录的一组超过4亿的私人查询日志。尽管用户产生的数据有着根本不同的意图,但我们发现可以从两个数据源中得出共同的结论——(i)不同位置的相对地理空间“足迹”在两个数据源中惊人地一致;(ii)确定重要地点的方法得出的结论相似;以及(iii)可通过自动识别相关位置组来实现类似的性能。这些结果表明,公开共享的位置信息可以补充(并在某些情况下取代)私人持有的位置信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forecasting location-based events with spatio-temporal storytelling VacationFinder: a tool for collecting, analyzing, and visualizing geotagged Twitter data to find top vacation spots Sophy: a morphological framework for structuring geo-referenced social media From where do tweets originate?: a GIS approach for user location inference WeiboStand: capturing Chinese breaking news using Weibo "tweets"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1