A Descriptive/Comparative Study of the Evolution of Process Models of Software Development Life Cycles (PM-SDLCs)

L. Rodríguez-Martínez, Manuel Mora Tavarez, Francisco Javier Álvarez Ramírez
{"title":"A Descriptive/Comparative Study of the Evolution of Process Models of Software Development Life Cycles (PM-SDLCs)","authors":"L. Rodríguez-Martínez, Manuel Mora Tavarez, Francisco Javier Álvarez Ramírez","doi":"10.1109/ENC.2009.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A relevant knowledge [24] (and consequently research area) is the study of software lifecycle process models (PM-SDLCs). Such process models have been defined in three abstraction levels: (i) full organizational software lifecycles process models (e.g. ISO 12207, ISO 15504, CMMI/SW); (ii) lifecycles frameworks models (e.g. waterfall, spiral, RAD, and others) and (iii) detailed software development life cycles process (e.g. unified process, TSP, MBASE, and others). This paper focuses on (ii) and (iii) levels and reports the results of a descriptive/comparative study of 13 PM-SDLCs that permits a plausible explanation of their evolution in terms of common, distinctive, and unique elements as well as of the specification rigor and agility attributes. For it, a conceptual research approach and a software process lifecycle meta-model are used. Findings from the conceptual analysis are reported. Paper ends with the description of research limitations and recommendations for further research.","PeriodicalId":273670,"journal":{"name":"2009 Mexican International Conference on Computer Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Mexican International Conference on Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENC.2009.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

A relevant knowledge [24] (and consequently research area) is the study of software lifecycle process models (PM-SDLCs). Such process models have been defined in three abstraction levels: (i) full organizational software lifecycles process models (e.g. ISO 12207, ISO 15504, CMMI/SW); (ii) lifecycles frameworks models (e.g. waterfall, spiral, RAD, and others) and (iii) detailed software development life cycles process (e.g. unified process, TSP, MBASE, and others). This paper focuses on (ii) and (iii) levels and reports the results of a descriptive/comparative study of 13 PM-SDLCs that permits a plausible explanation of their evolution in terms of common, distinctive, and unique elements as well as of the specification rigor and agility attributes. For it, a conceptual research approach and a software process lifecycle meta-model are used. Findings from the conceptual analysis are reported. Paper ends with the description of research limitations and recommendations for further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件开发生命周期(pm - sdlc)过程模型演化的描述/比较研究
一个相关的知识[24](以及相应的研究领域)是对软件生命周期过程模型(pm - sdlc)的研究。这样的过程模型被定义在三个抽象层次上:(i)完整的组织软件生命周期过程模型(例如ISO 12207、ISO 15504、CMMI/SW);(ii)生命周期框架模型(如瀑布式、螺旋式、RAD等)和(iii)详细的软件开发生命周期过程(如统一过程、TSP、MBASE等)。本文着重于(ii)和(iii)层次,并报告了对13个pm - sdlc的描述性/比较研究的结果,该研究允许从共同、独特和独特的元素以及规范严谨性和敏捷性属性方面对其演变进行合理的解释。本文采用了概念研究方法和软件过程生命周期元模型。报告了概念分析的结果。论文最后描述了研究的局限性和进一步研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Planning Learning Activities Pedagogically Suitable by Using Common Sense Knowledge Bimodal Biometric System for Cryptographic Key Generation Using Wavelet Transforms Using Adapted Software Architecture Development Methods in a SOA Context SCORM Compliant-Architecture for Including Simulations in E-learning Systems SISELS: Semantic Integration System for Exploitation of Biological Resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1