Scrutinizing Perseroan Perorangan: The Brainchild of Societas Unius Personae in the Realm of Indonesian Company Laws

David Tan
{"title":"Scrutinizing Perseroan Perorangan: The Brainchild of Societas Unius Personae in the Realm of Indonesian Company Laws","authors":"David Tan","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.56059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Indonesian government has long been committed to developing the business conditions, particularly for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). The debut of a single-person limited company (perseroan perorangan) is one of the numerous ambitions of this crucial aspiration. Debates circling this novel kind of company in Indonesia remain a heated debate between practitioners, jurists, scholars, and the government. This article endeavors to elucidate these debates by concentrating on the legal theories encompassing company laws, the practice of single-member limited liability companies overseas and domestically and scrutinizing the single-person limited companies amid the contemporary Indonesian legal dan regulatory regime. This research utilizes doctrinal legal study and secondary data. Dogmatic literature reviews are carried out on scholarly works concerning the subject matter, and the analysis is carried out using the qualitative method. This inquiry reveals that the current single-person limited companies in Indonesia are supported adequately by several legal theories. This sort of company has been exercised in numerous nations, mainly in Europe. There is also room for legislative and executive development and juridical enhancement to ultimately maximize the company's potential.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Scientia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.56059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Indonesian government has long been committed to developing the business conditions, particularly for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). The debut of a single-person limited company (perseroan perorangan) is one of the numerous ambitions of this crucial aspiration. Debates circling this novel kind of company in Indonesia remain a heated debate between practitioners, jurists, scholars, and the government. This article endeavors to elucidate these debates by concentrating on the legal theories encompassing company laws, the practice of single-member limited liability companies overseas and domestically and scrutinizing the single-person limited companies amid the contemporary Indonesian legal dan regulatory regime. This research utilizes doctrinal legal study and secondary data. Dogmatic literature reviews are carried out on scholarly works concerning the subject matter, and the analysis is carried out using the qualitative method. This inquiry reveals that the current single-person limited companies in Indonesia are supported adequately by several legal theories. This sort of company has been exercised in numerous nations, mainly in Europe. There is also room for legislative and executive development and juridical enhancement to ultimately maximize the company's potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审视perseran Perorangan:印尼公司法领域的统一人格社会的产物
印尼政府长期以来一直致力于发展商业环境,特别是为微型、小型和中型企业(MSMEs)。个人有限公司(perseran perorangan)的首次亮相是这一重要抱负的众多雄心之一。在印度尼西亚,围绕这种新型公司的争论仍然是从业者、法学家、学者和政府之间的激烈辩论。本文试图通过关注公司法的法律理论、国内外单一成员有限责任公司的实践,以及审视当代印度尼西亚法律监管制度下的单一成员有限责任公司,来阐明这些争论。本研究运用法律理论研究和二手资料。教条式的文献综述是对有关主题的学术著作进行的,分析是用定性的方法进行的。这一调查表明,目前印度尼西亚的一人有限公司有几个法律理论的充分支持。这种公司已经在许多国家实行,主要是在欧洲。还有立法和行政发展以及司法改进的空间,以最终最大化公司的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positivization of Fatwas of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council in the Sharia Banking Law: Problems and Challenges Land Subsidence Policy in the Context of Good Governance Principles (Comparing Indonesia and Japan) Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Vietnam’s New Generation Free Trade Agreements – Challenges and Recommendations Rejection of Former Shia Community in Sampang Perspective on Human Rights Law: Discourse of Religious Rights and Freedom in Indonesia Comparative Analysis Between Employees Provident Fund (EPF) & Private Retirement Scheme (PRS) in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1