The Effectiveness of the Complete Sentence Learning Method with Giving Questions and Getting Answers on Students Physics Learning Outcomes of SMPN 1 Sampaga

Fitriani Kadir, Muh. Subhan, I. Permana, I. G. P. Edi Saputra, Syamsuriana Basri
{"title":"The Effectiveness of the Complete Sentence Learning Method with Giving Questions and Getting Answers on Students Physics Learning Outcomes of SMPN 1 Sampaga","authors":"Fitriani Kadir, Muh. Subhan, I. Permana, I. G. P. Edi Saputra, Syamsuriana Basri","doi":"10.20414/konstan.v7i02.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study will examine the efficacy of employing a mix of Complete Sentence learning approaches by Giving Questions and Getting Answers. The research population of grade VIII students of SMPN 1 Sampaga, for the 2019-2020 school year, and the data collection method using simple random sampling. Using inferential statistical analysis methods, the study tool employed was a test instrument for student observation and learning outcomes. Before adopting the combination of Complete Sentence learning methods with Giving Questions and Getting Answers, student learning outcomes averaged 40.18. According to the Ministry of Education and Culture's requirements, students' cognitive results fell into the low category, with a high percentage of 60.71%. Still, after receiving treatment, it increased to an average value of 75.54. Students with a rate of 50.00% as high. According to the t-test results of hypothesis testing, H0 is rejected, and Ha is accepted. This study's findings support the notion that this teaching strategy enhances students' learning results in energy and effort. The research implies that using the Complete Sentence learning method in conjunction with Giving Questions and Getting Answers should be considered a physics learning approach to enhance learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":137476,"journal":{"name":"KONSTAN - JURNAL FISIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KONSTAN - JURNAL FISIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20414/konstan.v7i02.225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study will examine the efficacy of employing a mix of Complete Sentence learning approaches by Giving Questions and Getting Answers. The research population of grade VIII students of SMPN 1 Sampaga, for the 2019-2020 school year, and the data collection method using simple random sampling. Using inferential statistical analysis methods, the study tool employed was a test instrument for student observation and learning outcomes. Before adopting the combination of Complete Sentence learning methods with Giving Questions and Getting Answers, student learning outcomes averaged 40.18. According to the Ministry of Education and Culture's requirements, students' cognitive results fell into the low category, with a high percentage of 60.71%. Still, after receiving treatment, it increased to an average value of 75.54. Students with a rate of 50.00% as high. According to the t-test results of hypothesis testing, H0 is rejected, and Ha is accepted. This study's findings support the notion that this teaching strategy enhances students' learning results in energy and effort. The research implies that using the Complete Sentence learning method in conjunction with Giving Questions and Getting Answers should be considered a physics learning approach to enhance learning outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完整句提问答题法对学生物理学习成果的影响
本研究将考察通过提出问题和获得答案的混合完整句子学习方法的效果。研究对象为Sampaga SMPN 1学校2019-2020学年的八年级学生,数据收集方法为简单随机抽样。采用推理统计分析方法,研究工具是学生观察和学习成果的测试工具。在采用完整句学习方法与提问和回答相结合之前,学生的平均学习成绩为40.18。根据教育和文化部的要求,学生的认知成绩属于低类别,比例较高,为60.71%。然而,在接受治疗后,它增加到平均值75.54。学生的通过率高达50.00%。根据假设检验的t检验结果,H0被拒绝,Ha被接受。本研究的结果支持了这种教学策略在精力和努力方面提高学生学习效果的观点。该研究表明,将完整句子学习方法与提出问题和获得答案相结合,应该被视为一种提高学习效果的物理学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review of Extraterrestrial Organic Carbon and its Potential Impact on Life on Earth Physical Characterization of Paper Made from Durian Peels and Corn Stalks Design and Development of A Portable Conductivity-Based Salinity Measurement System for Coastal Well Water An Overview of Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Aspects of the Junior High School Concept of Pressure Functional Group Analysis of Silica Gel Based on River Sand Magnetic Mineral as Heavy Metal Absorbance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1