1 The crystalloid versus colloid controversy: present status

FRCA, FFICANZCA Ken Hillman (Director, Division of Critical Care), FANZCA, FFICANZCA Gillian Bishop (Director, Intensive Care Unit), FRACP Peter Bristow (Intensivist)
{"title":"1 The crystalloid versus colloid controversy: present status","authors":"FRCA, FFICANZCA Ken Hillman (Director, Division of Critical Care),&nbsp;FANZCA, FFICANZCA Gillian Bishop (Director, Intensive Care Unit),&nbsp;FRACP Peter Bristow (Intensivist)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80003-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ‘crystalloid-colloid debate’ has a history clouded by practical issues of availability of colloids. The two kinds of solutions have different physical properties and different roles. While crystalloids can replete the circulation, they do so at the expense of a larger fluid load to the body which may have drawbacks.</p><p>Studies comparing mortality between the use of crystalloids and colloids have shown differing results. A definitive answer is unlikely from such studies. Early vigorous restoration of the circulation is more important.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80610,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3501(97)80003-7","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950350197800037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

The ‘crystalloid-colloid debate’ has a history clouded by practical issues of availability of colloids. The two kinds of solutions have different physical properties and different roles. While crystalloids can replete the circulation, they do so at the expense of a larger fluid load to the body which may have drawbacks.

Studies comparing mortality between the use of crystalloids and colloids have shown differing results. A definitive answer is unlikely from such studies. Early vigorous restoration of the circulation is more important.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晶体与胶体之争:现状
“晶体-胶体之争”的历史被胶体可用性的实际问题所笼罩。两种溶液具有不同的物理性质和不同的作用。虽然晶体可以填补循环,但它们这样做的代价是身体的液体负荷更大,这可能有缺点。比较使用晶体和胶体的死亡率的研究显示出不同的结果。这样的研究不太可能给出一个明确的答案。尽早有力地恢复血液循环更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface 9 Transoesophageal echocardiography in trauma patients 7 Monitoring by transoesophageal echocardiography in minimally invasive cardiac surgery 5 Left ventricular diastolic function 8 Echocardiography in aortic disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1