The Effectiveness of Decompression Surgery on Low Back Pain in Patients with Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Sangbong Ko, Jaejun Lee, Junho Nam
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Decompression Surgery on Low Back Pain in Patients with Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis","authors":"Sangbong Ko, Jaejun Lee, Junho Nam","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-102430/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS) complain of not only the lower leg symptoms but also low back pain (LBP) simultaneously in many cases. Therefore, patients who undergo decompressive surgery expect recovery from LBP as well as lower leg symptoms, and surgeons who perform decompression surgery are making efforts to improve both symptoms. The objective of this study is to investigate whether decompression surgery can improve low back pain and symptoms of lower limb pain in patients with one level central lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods: The present study included 39 patients who had findings of central lumbar spinal stenosis and underwent decompression surgery due to its corresponding claudication and lower leg radiating pain complaints from 2013 to 2018. Their pain (lower leg radiating pain and low back pain) and functional outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Short Form-36 (SF-36)) were evaluated before surgery and 6 and 12 months after surgery.Results: Mean lower leg radiating pain continuously showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05, p = 0.003); however, the clinical significance of differences above minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was up to 6 months. Mean low back pain was 4.72 ± 3.40 before surgery, 2.33 ± 2.27 at 6 months after surgery, and 2.21 ± 2.02 at 12 months after surgery, showing statistically and clinically significant improvement (p < 0.05) up to 6 months after surgery, after which there were no findings of improvement. Conclusion: Decompression surgery for patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis showed clinically significant improvements in lower leg radiating pain and low back pain up to 6 months after surgery and continuous improvements in lower leg radiating pain up to 12 months, but there was no continuous improvement in LBP.","PeriodicalId":430424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery","volume":"278 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-102430/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS) complain of not only the lower leg symptoms but also low back pain (LBP) simultaneously in many cases. Therefore, patients who undergo decompressive surgery expect recovery from LBP as well as lower leg symptoms, and surgeons who perform decompression surgery are making efforts to improve both symptoms. The objective of this study is to investigate whether decompression surgery can improve low back pain and symptoms of lower limb pain in patients with one level central lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods: The present study included 39 patients who had findings of central lumbar spinal stenosis and underwent decompression surgery due to its corresponding claudication and lower leg radiating pain complaints from 2013 to 2018. Their pain (lower leg radiating pain and low back pain) and functional outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Short Form-36 (SF-36)) were evaluated before surgery and 6 and 12 months after surgery.Results: Mean lower leg radiating pain continuously showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05, p = 0.003); however, the clinical significance of differences above minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was up to 6 months. Mean low back pain was 4.72 ± 3.40 before surgery, 2.33 ± 2.27 at 6 months after surgery, and 2.21 ± 2.02 at 12 months after surgery, showing statistically and clinically significant improvement (p < 0.05) up to 6 months after surgery, after which there were no findings of improvement. Conclusion: Decompression surgery for patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis showed clinically significant improvements in lower leg radiating pain and low back pain up to 6 months after surgery and continuous improvements in lower leg radiating pain up to 12 months, but there was no continuous improvement in LBP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减压手术治疗中枢性腰椎管狭窄症腰痛的疗效观察
背景:中枢性腰椎管狭窄症(CLSS)患者在许多病例中不仅有下肢症状,而且同时有腰痛(LBP)。因此,接受减压手术的患者期望从LBP和下肢症状中恢复,而进行减压手术的外科医生正在努力改善这两种症状。本研究的目的是探讨减压手术是否可以改善一节段中央腰椎管狭窄患者的腰痛和下肢疼痛症状。方法:本研究纳入2013年至2018年39例因相应的跛行和下肢放射痛主诉而出现中央腰椎管狭窄并行减压手术的患者。术前、术后6个月和12个月评估患者的疼痛(下肢放射痛和腰痛)和功能结局(Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、Roland-Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ)和SF-36)。结果:下肢放射痛持续平均改善有统计学意义(p < 0.05, p = 0.003);而最小临床重要差异(minimum clinical important difference, MCID)以上差异的临床意义可达6个月。平均腰痛术前为4.72±3.40,术后6个月为2.33±2.27,术后12个月为2.21±2.02,术后6个月均有显著改善(p < 0.05),术后无明显改善。结论:中枢性腰椎管狭窄症患者行减压手术后,术后6个月下肢放射痛和腰痛均有临床显著改善,术后12个月下肢放射痛持续改善,但LBP无持续改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Morphological Features and Clinical Results of C2 Vertebral Body Fractures 외상성 경추 손상 후 수상에서 응급수술까지의 시간 지연과 관련된 인자 고주파 수핵 성형술 후 발생한 장요근 혈종: 증례 보고 Cerebral Infarction That Occurred Before Drug Administration During Cervical Nerve Root Block Using an Image Amplifier: A Case Report Parathyroid Hormone Injection Versus Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture in Old Age: A Retrospective Study of 58 Female Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1