Evolution of the Accessibility Concept

J. Levine, Joe Grengs, Louis A. Merlin
{"title":"Evolution of the Accessibility Concept","authors":"J. Levine, Joe Grengs, Louis A. Merlin","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501716072.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the major themes in the evolution of accessibility over the twentieth century. The idea of accessibility is not new, either to urban and regional planning or to the social sciences in general. The concept dates back at least to Richard Hurd's 1903 analysis of urban growth, Robert Haig's 1926 “ease of contact,” and John Stewart's 1948 “demographic energy.” In Stewart's analysis, the first of the three to quantify the accessibility concept, it was a good predictor of outcomes, including observed income at the state level. Stewart also recognized the potential of accessibility as a normative goal early on: if energy or accessibility can predict important outcomes such as income, then surely it could also be seen as a policy variable to be directly manipulated by central planners. Echoing earlier authors, Walter Hansen applied the term “accessibility” to Stewart's “demographic energy” and broadly introduced the concept into the urban and regional realm with three ideas central to the planning use of the tool. First, like Hurd's and Haig's analyses early in the century—and unlike Stewart's nationally scaled research—Hansen's analysis was metropolitan, not the continental. Second, the outcome variable for Hansen was residential development, a central concern of the urban-planning profession. And finally, where Stewart had implicitly treated peoples' inclination to travel as a constant value, Hansen showed that it was a variable subject to empirical investigation.","PeriodicalId":309474,"journal":{"name":"From Mobility to Accessibility","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From Mobility to Accessibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501716072.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses the major themes in the evolution of accessibility over the twentieth century. The idea of accessibility is not new, either to urban and regional planning or to the social sciences in general. The concept dates back at least to Richard Hurd's 1903 analysis of urban growth, Robert Haig's 1926 “ease of contact,” and John Stewart's 1948 “demographic energy.” In Stewart's analysis, the first of the three to quantify the accessibility concept, it was a good predictor of outcomes, including observed income at the state level. Stewart also recognized the potential of accessibility as a normative goal early on: if energy or accessibility can predict important outcomes such as income, then surely it could also be seen as a policy variable to be directly manipulated by central planners. Echoing earlier authors, Walter Hansen applied the term “accessibility” to Stewart's “demographic energy” and broadly introduced the concept into the urban and regional realm with three ideas central to the planning use of the tool. First, like Hurd's and Haig's analyses early in the century—and unlike Stewart's nationally scaled research—Hansen's analysis was metropolitan, not the continental. Second, the outcome variable for Hansen was residential development, a central concern of the urban-planning profession. And finally, where Stewart had implicitly treated peoples' inclination to travel as a constant value, Hansen showed that it was a variable subject to empirical investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无障碍概念的演变
本章讨论了20世纪无障碍发展的主要主题。无论是对城市和区域规划,还是对一般的社会科学来说,可达性的概念并不新鲜。这个概念至少可以追溯到理查德·赫德1903年对城市增长的分析,罗伯特·黑格1926年的“接触便利”,以及约翰·斯图尔特1948年的“人口能量”。在斯图尔特的分析中,这是三个量化可达性概念的第一个,它是一个很好的预测结果,包括在州一级观察到的收入。斯图尔特也很早就认识到可达性作为一个规范性目标的潜力:如果能源或可达性可以预测收入等重要结果,那么它当然也可以被视为一个政策变量,由中央计划者直接操纵。与早期作者的观点相呼应,沃尔特·汉森将“可达性”一词应用于斯图尔特的“人口能量”,并将这一概念广泛地引入城市和区域领域,并提出了该工具规划使用的三个核心思想。首先,像赫德和黑格在本世纪初的分析一样——也不像斯图尔特的全国性研究——汉森的分析是大都市的,而不是大陆的。其次,汉森的结果变量是住宅开发,这是城市规划专业人士关注的中心问题。最后,斯图尔特含蓄地将人们的旅行倾向视为一个常量,而汉森则表明它是一个变量,需要进行实证调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion: Envisioning the Accessibility Shift 7. Nonwork Accessibility Nonwork Accessibility 4. Accessibility and Urban Form 1. What Is Transportation For?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1