Experiences in Evolving System-of-Systems Engineering Methodology to Address Pain Points

Cesare Guariniello, A. Raz, L. Mockus, D. DeLaurentis
{"title":"Experiences in Evolving System-of-Systems Engineering Methodology to Address Pain Points","authors":"Cesare Guariniello, A. Raz, L. Mockus, D. DeLaurentis","doi":"10.1109/SYSOSE.2019.8753852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing interest in System-of-Systems has resulted in rapid and widespread application of its concepts to a variety of problems. While this generated a large number of novel and valuable techniques, tools, and methodologies in System-of-Systems Engineering, it also broadened the problem domains, and subsequently made it difficult to achieve a high degree of coordination and cohesion in the discipline. Previous attempts at creating a formal structure to System-of-Systems Engineering provided valuable support to practitioners, but have been sometimes disconnected from the current practical needs in the discipline, leaving behind some pain points that still need to be addressed. In this work, we propose a different perspective to deal with the pain points: based on our experience and on analysis of the current challenges of System-of-Systems Engineering, we identify potential research directions which are based on domain-agnostic methodology, but of interest to a variety of problems in System-of-Systems. This dual feature of the research directions is explored here to identify a connection between the necessity of establishing formal and generic procedures for System-of-Systems Engineering along with the usability and utility of practical tools and techniques for applied problems.","PeriodicalId":133413,"journal":{"name":"2019 14th Annual Conference System of Systems Engineering (SoSE)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 14th Annual Conference System of Systems Engineering (SoSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2019.8753852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The growing interest in System-of-Systems has resulted in rapid and widespread application of its concepts to a variety of problems. While this generated a large number of novel and valuable techniques, tools, and methodologies in System-of-Systems Engineering, it also broadened the problem domains, and subsequently made it difficult to achieve a high degree of coordination and cohesion in the discipline. Previous attempts at creating a formal structure to System-of-Systems Engineering provided valuable support to practitioners, but have been sometimes disconnected from the current practical needs in the discipline, leaving behind some pain points that still need to be addressed. In this work, we propose a different perspective to deal with the pain points: based on our experience and on analysis of the current challenges of System-of-Systems Engineering, we identify potential research directions which are based on domain-agnostic methodology, but of interest to a variety of problems in System-of-Systems. This dual feature of the research directions is explored here to identify a connection between the necessity of establishing formal and generic procedures for System-of-Systems Engineering along with the usability and utility of practical tools and techniques for applied problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决痛点的系统工程方法论的发展经验
对“系统的系统”日益增长的兴趣导致其概念迅速和广泛地应用于各种问题。虽然这在系统的系统工程中产生了大量新颖而有价值的技术、工具和方法,但它也扩大了问题领域,并随后使在该学科中实现高度的协调和内聚变得困难。以前为系统工程创建正式结构的尝试为实践者提供了有价值的支持,但是有时与规程中当前的实际需求脱节,留下了一些仍然需要解决的痛点。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个不同的视角来处理痛点:基于我们的经验和对系统工程系统当前挑战的分析,我们确定了基于领域不可知论方法的潜在研究方向,但对系统的各种问题感兴趣。本文探讨了研究方向的双重特征,以确定为系统工程建立正式和通用程序的必要性,以及针对应用问题的实用工具和技术的可用性和实用性之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling Integral Risk Assessment (MOIRA): Experiments on the Dutch Railway Departure Process Development of soft computing tools and IoT for improving the performance assessment of analysers in a clinical laboratory Architectural reasoning in the conceptual phase - a case study in the oil and gas industry Data Center Investment vs. System Reliability in Power Distribution Systems Model-Based Approach to System of Systems Engineering: Reevaluating the Role of Simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1