Effect Of LMA-Classic And LMA-Proseal Insertion On Intraocular Pressure In Adult Patients.

Promila Phaughat, S. Kiran, A. Khurana, S. Hooda
{"title":"Effect Of LMA-Classic And LMA-Proseal Insertion On Intraocular Pressure In Adult Patients.","authors":"Promila Phaughat, S. Kiran, A. Khurana, S. Hooda","doi":"10.5580/2ac8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the primary aims of anaesthetic management during ophthalmic surgery is to provide optimal control of intraocular pressure (IOP). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-classic and LMA-ProSeal have been compared on many aspects but we could not locate any trials comparing the effect of their insertion on IOP. Present study compared effect of LMA-classic and LMA-ProSeal insertion on the IOP. Methods: 100 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgical procedures were divided into two groups (LMA-classic in 50 patients and LMA-ProSeal in 50 patients). Baseline IOP was recorded and after induction, LMA insertion was performed. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and halothane in oxygen. IOP was measured just before LMA insertion, just after LMA insertion and thereafter at intervals of 1, 3 and 5 minutes. Results: IOP decreased in both groups after induction with propofol (p value> 0.05). It rose just after the insertion of airway device in both the groups (p value>0.05). At one minute after the device insertion IOP started decreasing (p value>0.05). At 3 minutes and 5 minutes after the insertion of airway device the IOP was still decreasing in both the groups and was not significantly different. Conclusion: Results of the present study show that IOP always remains below baseline with the use of LMA-classic as well as LMA-ProSeal. The study showed similar profile of two devices as far as IOP is concerned.","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2ac8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: One of the primary aims of anaesthetic management during ophthalmic surgery is to provide optimal control of intraocular pressure (IOP). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-classic and LMA-ProSeal have been compared on many aspects but we could not locate any trials comparing the effect of their insertion on IOP. Present study compared effect of LMA-classic and LMA-ProSeal insertion on the IOP. Methods: 100 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgical procedures were divided into two groups (LMA-classic in 50 patients and LMA-ProSeal in 50 patients). Baseline IOP was recorded and after induction, LMA insertion was performed. Anaesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide and halothane in oxygen. IOP was measured just before LMA insertion, just after LMA insertion and thereafter at intervals of 1, 3 and 5 minutes. Results: IOP decreased in both groups after induction with propofol (p value> 0.05). It rose just after the insertion of airway device in both the groups (p value>0.05). At one minute after the device insertion IOP started decreasing (p value>0.05). At 3 minutes and 5 minutes after the insertion of airway device the IOP was still decreasing in both the groups and was not significantly different. Conclusion: Results of the present study show that IOP always remains below baseline with the use of LMA-classic as well as LMA-ProSeal. The study showed similar profile of two devices as far as IOP is concerned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
lma -经典和LMA-Proseal植入对成人眼压的影响。
背景:眼科手术麻醉管理的主要目的之一是提供最佳控制眼压(IOP)。经典喉罩气道(LMA -classic)和proseal喉罩气道(LMA - proseal)在许多方面进行了比较,但我们无法找到任何比较其插入对IOP影响的试验。本研究比较了LMA-classic和LMA-ProSeal植入术对IOP的影响。方法:择期手术全麻患者100例分为两组(LMA-classic组50例,LMA-ProSeal组50例)。记录基线IOP,诱导后进行LMA插入。在氧气中使用氧化亚氮和氟烷维持麻醉。在LMA插入前、LMA插入后以及之后每隔1分钟、3分钟和5分钟测量IOP。结果:两组患者经异丙酚诱导后眼压均下降(p值0.05)。两组均在刚插入气道装置后升高(p值>.05)。插入装置1分钟后IOP开始下降(p值>0.05)。在插管后3分钟和5分钟,两组IOP仍在下降,差异无统计学意义。结论:本研究结果表明,使用LMA-classic和LMA-ProSeal时,IOP始终低于基线。该研究显示,就IOP而言,两种设备的情况相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury With Laryngeal Mask Airway Unusual Oral Cavity Metastasis From Follicular Carcinoma Of The Thyroid – A Case Report Efficacy of Ephedrine Versus Lignocaine Pretreatment In Preventing Pain Following Propofol Injection: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study. Cesarean Section of a 25 3/7 Week Parturient with Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: A Case Report Magill Forceps- An Aid For Difficult Intubation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1