Reliability analysis and comparison of two fail-op/fail-op/fail-safe architectures

Arun Kumar Somani, T. R. Sarnaik
{"title":"Reliability analysis and comparison of two fail-op/fail-op/fail-safe architectures","authors":"Arun Kumar Somani, T. R. Sarnaik","doi":"10.1109/FTCS.1989.105637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two different fault-tolerant architectural concepts for a computer node to be used in a distributed embedded environment have been developed to meet the requirements that the system can sustain at least two independent, nonsimulation hardware failures and remain operational. The architectures are distinguished by the organization of their fault-tolerant algorithm hardware. An analysis is made of these two architectures, and several issues on the reliability analysis of such complex architectures are addressed. Techniques are developed to reduce the complexity of the reliability model. An analysis of the interrelationship between the number of retries and their effect upon system reliability for different average transient lifetimes has also been performed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":230363,"journal":{"name":"[1989] The Nineteenth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. Digest of Papers","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] The Nineteenth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. Digest of Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1989.105637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Two different fault-tolerant architectural concepts for a computer node to be used in a distributed embedded environment have been developed to meet the requirements that the system can sustain at least two independent, nonsimulation hardware failures and remain operational. The architectures are distinguished by the organization of their fault-tolerant algorithm hardware. An analysis is made of these two architectures, and several issues on the reliability analysis of such complex architectures are addressed. Techniques are developed to reduce the complexity of the reliability model. An analysis of the interrelationship between the number of retries and their effect upon system reliability for different average transient lifetimes has also been performed.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种故障-op/故障-op/故障安全架构的可靠性分析与比较
针对分布式嵌入式环境中使用的计算机节点,提出了两种不同的容错体系结构概念,以满足系统能够承受至少两个独立的非仿真硬件故障并保持运行的要求。这些体系结构是通过容错算法硬件的组织来区分的。对这两种结构进行了分析,并对这类复杂结构的可靠性分析问题进行了探讨。开发了降低可靠性模型复杂性的技术。本文还分析了不同平均暂态寿命下重试次数与重试次数对系统可靠性的影响之间的相互关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Replication within atomic actions and conversations: a case study in fault-tolerance duality Byte unidirectional error correcting codes F-T in telecommunications networks: state, perspectives, trends Evaluation of fault-tolerant systems with nonhomogeneous workloads Control-flow checking using watchdog assists and extended-precision checksums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1