Análisis psicométrico de la escala de estresores academicos (ECEA), en estudiantes de la Universidad Catolica de Santa Maria

Tania Malu Chavez Anaya, Maria Mercedes Cuadros Rivera, Araceli Lopez Maque, Maria Fernanda Montoya Zea, Nikolle Requena Esquieros, Yomira Talavera Aliga
{"title":"Análisis psicométrico de la escala de estresores academicos (ECEA), en estudiantes de la Universidad Catolica de Santa Maria","authors":"Tania Malu Chavez Anaya, Maria Mercedes Cuadros Rivera, Araceli Lopez Maque, Maria Fernanda Montoya Zea, Nikolle Requena Esquieros, Yomira Talavera Aliga","doi":"10.33539/AVPSICOL.2019V27N1.1467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to determine the validity and reliability of the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) developed by Cabanach et al. (2016). To this end, this scale was applied to a sample of 150 university students (38 men and 112 women) of the Catholic University of Santa Maria with an age range of 16 to 32 years. To determine the criterion validity, first, item-scale correlations were performed, obtaining correlation coefficients that are between .429 and .697. The validity of the construct was assessed by exploratory factor analysis with the maximum likelihood method, obtaining a KMO value of .874. By means of the direct Oblimin rotation technique, 12 factors were found, of which, when doing the second factorization, only two factorswere left, which did not confirm the structure of the test proposed by Cabanach et al. However, the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) has adequate psychometric properties that make it possible to recommend its use as an instrument for assessing academic stress.","PeriodicalId":273778,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Psicología","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Psicología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33539/AVPSICOL.2019V27N1.1467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the validity and reliability of the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) developed by Cabanach et al. (2016). To this end, this scale was applied to a sample of 150 university students (38 men and 112 women) of the Catholic University of Santa Maria with an age range of 16 to 32 years. To determine the criterion validity, first, item-scale correlations were performed, obtaining correlation coefficients that are between .429 and .697. The validity of the construct was assessed by exploratory factor analysis with the maximum likelihood method, obtaining a KMO value of .874. By means of the direct Oblimin rotation technique, 12 factors were found, of which, when doing the second factorization, only two factorswere left, which did not confirm the structure of the test proposed by Cabanach et al. However, the Academic Stressors Scale (ECEA) has adequate psychometric properties that make it possible to recommend its use as an instrument for assessing academic stress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣玛丽亚天主教大学学生学术压力量表(ECEA)的心理测量分析
本研究的目的是确定Cabanach et al.(2016)开发的学术压力源量表(ECEA)的效度和信度。为此,本量表应用于圣玛丽亚天主教大学的150名大学生(38名男性,112名女性),年龄在16岁至32岁之间。为了确定标准的效度,首先进行了项目量表的相关分析,得到了0.429到0.697之间的相关系数。运用最大似然法进行探索性因子分析,得到的KMO值为0.874。通过直接Oblimin旋转技术,发现了12个因子,其中,在做第二次因子分解时,只剩下两个因子,这并没有证实Cabanach等人提出的检验结构。然而,学业压力源量表(ECEA)具有足够的心理测量特性,可以推荐使用它作为评估学业压力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La felicidad y el sentido de vida, una mirada humanista Recuperación de energía del trabajador: un enfoque psicológico Impulsividad en gestores de venta y mercaderistas Adaptación de la atención terapéutica en poblaciones vulnerables que atraviesan situaciones de emergencia Cambios y retos para la terapia conductual – cognitiva a partir del covid-19: reflexiones sobre la telepsicoterapia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1