Concordance: a critical participatory alternative in healthcare IT

E. Grönvall, N. Verdezoto, Naveen Bagalkot, Tomas Sokoler
{"title":"Concordance: a critical participatory alternative in healthcare IT","authors":"E. Grönvall, N. Verdezoto, Naveen Bagalkot, Tomas Sokoler","doi":"10.7146/AAHCC.V1I1.21315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The healthcare sector is undergoing large changes in which technology is given a more active role in both in-clinic and out-of-clinic care. Authoritative healthcare models such as compliance and adherence which relies on asymmetric patient-doctor relationships are being challenged as society, patient roles and care contexts transforms, for example when care activities move into non-clinical contexts. Concordance is an alternative model proposed by the medical field that favours an equal and collaborative patient-doctor relationship in the negotiation of care. Similarly, HCI researchers have applied diverse models of engagement in IT design ranging from authoritative models (e.g. perceiving people as human factors to design for) to more democratic design processes (e.g. Participatory Design). IT design has also been crafted as on-going processes that are integrated parts of everyday use. Based on the best practice of participation from the medical and the HCI fields, we identify critical alternatives for healthcare design. These alternatives highlight opportunities with ongoing design processes in which the design of care regimens and care IT are perceived as one process.","PeriodicalId":297193,"journal":{"name":"Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/AAHCC.V1I1.21315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The healthcare sector is undergoing large changes in which technology is given a more active role in both in-clinic and out-of-clinic care. Authoritative healthcare models such as compliance and adherence which relies on asymmetric patient-doctor relationships are being challenged as society, patient roles and care contexts transforms, for example when care activities move into non-clinical contexts. Concordance is an alternative model proposed by the medical field that favours an equal and collaborative patient-doctor relationship in the negotiation of care. Similarly, HCI researchers have applied diverse models of engagement in IT design ranging from authoritative models (e.g. perceiving people as human factors to design for) to more democratic design processes (e.g. Participatory Design). IT design has also been crafted as on-going processes that are integrated parts of everyday use. Based on the best practice of participation from the medical and the HCI fields, we identify critical alternatives for healthcare design. These alternatives highlight opportunities with ongoing design processes in which the design of care regimens and care IT are perceived as one process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一致性:医疗保健IT中的关键参与性替代方案
医疗保健行业正在经历巨大变革,技术在门诊和门诊外护理中发挥了更积极的作用。随着社会、患者角色和护理环境的转变,例如当护理活动进入非临床环境时,诸如依赖于不对称医患关系的依从性和依从性等权威医疗保健模式正在受到挑战。和谐是医学界提出的另一种模式,它有利于在医疗谈判中建立平等和合作的医患关系。同样,HCI研究人员在IT设计中应用了各种参与模型,从权威模型(例如,将人视为设计的人为因素)到更民主的设计过程(例如,参与式设计)。IT设计也被精心设计为日常使用中集成部分的持续过程。根据医疗和HCI领域参与的最佳实践,我们确定了医疗保健设计的关键替代方案。这些替代方案突出了正在进行的设计过程的机会,在这些过程中,护理方案的设计和护理IT被视为一个过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Note to self: stop calling interfaces "natural" Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai manufacturing and maker entrepreneurs Charismatic technology Double binds and double blinds: evaluation tactics in critically oriented HCI Gaza everywhere: exploring the applicability of a rhetorical lens in HCI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1