Neurogenic and psychogenic behavioral correlates of HIV infection.

I Grant, J H Atkinson
{"title":"Neurogenic and psychogenic behavioral correlates of HIV infection.","authors":"I Grant,&nbsp;J H Atkinson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this chapter, we have suggested that neurobehavioral phenomena in HIV-infected individuals can be usefully grouped according to underlying pathogenesis. Neurogenic phenomena are those that result from direct involvement of the brain either by HIV-1 (primary neurogenic disorder) or from opportunistic infection, neoplasia, or side effects of treatment (secondary neurogenic disorder). These phenomena should be distinguished from disturbances resulting from a second pathogenetic mechanism--the psychogenic disorders. We define psychogenic disorders as those that reflect primarily psychological responses to knowledge of HIV infection and/or progression of disease, and resultant of social ramifications. In proposing the neurogenic and psychogenic groupings, we do not intend to harken back to antique \"mind-body\" distinctions. We recognize fully that diseases of the brain can and do cause disturbances in mood, thought, and behavior, and that preexisting psychogenic disturbances might, in fact, be substantially worsened by onset of such neuropathology. Nevertheless, for the sake of clarity and also of determining appropriate treatment, we feel that the distinction we propose is a heuristically useful one. Challenges that lie ahead include defining more precisely the incidence and natural course of HIV-associated neurogenic disorder. Although there is little doubt that CDC IV individuals have higher prevalence of both subclinical and clinical \"organic mental\" symptomatology, the time of onset and rate of progression of such changes are not understood. At present, it seems likely that early in the course of HIV infection, the CNS is spared; at some point, however, rate of neuropsychiatric abnormality probably increases, and this may not be directly related to progression of the immunological aspect of the disease. In regard to psychogenic phenomena, it is clear that anxiety syndrome can occur as a direct product of knowledge of HIV serostatus and may be exacerbated by progression of disease. It is possible also that some subgroups of HIV + individuals (e.g., military samples) may be at heightened risk for suicide. These observations pose challenges for focused intervention with these groups. Accumulating data both on neurogenic and psychogenic phenomenology underscore also the importance of conceptualizing HIV infection in neurobehavioral as well as immunologic-virologic terms.</p>","PeriodicalId":76423,"journal":{"name":"Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease","volume":"68 ","pages":"291-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this chapter, we have suggested that neurobehavioral phenomena in HIV-infected individuals can be usefully grouped according to underlying pathogenesis. Neurogenic phenomena are those that result from direct involvement of the brain either by HIV-1 (primary neurogenic disorder) or from opportunistic infection, neoplasia, or side effects of treatment (secondary neurogenic disorder). These phenomena should be distinguished from disturbances resulting from a second pathogenetic mechanism--the psychogenic disorders. We define psychogenic disorders as those that reflect primarily psychological responses to knowledge of HIV infection and/or progression of disease, and resultant of social ramifications. In proposing the neurogenic and psychogenic groupings, we do not intend to harken back to antique "mind-body" distinctions. We recognize fully that diseases of the brain can and do cause disturbances in mood, thought, and behavior, and that preexisting psychogenic disturbances might, in fact, be substantially worsened by onset of such neuropathology. Nevertheless, for the sake of clarity and also of determining appropriate treatment, we feel that the distinction we propose is a heuristically useful one. Challenges that lie ahead include defining more precisely the incidence and natural course of HIV-associated neurogenic disorder. Although there is little doubt that CDC IV individuals have higher prevalence of both subclinical and clinical "organic mental" symptomatology, the time of onset and rate of progression of such changes are not understood. At present, it seems likely that early in the course of HIV infection, the CNS is spared; at some point, however, rate of neuropsychiatric abnormality probably increases, and this may not be directly related to progression of the immunological aspect of the disease. In regard to psychogenic phenomena, it is clear that anxiety syndrome can occur as a direct product of knowledge of HIV serostatus and may be exacerbated by progression of disease. It is possible also that some subgroups of HIV + individuals (e.g., military samples) may be at heightened risk for suicide. These observations pose challenges for focused intervention with these groups. Accumulating data both on neurogenic and psychogenic phenomenology underscore also the importance of conceptualizing HIV infection in neurobehavioral as well as immunologic-virologic terms.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HIV感染的神经源性和心因性行为相关性。
在本章中,我们已经提出,hiv感染者的神经行为现象可以根据潜在的发病机制进行有效的分组。神经源性现象是由HIV-1(原发性神经源性疾病)或机会性感染、肿瘤或治疗副作用(继发性神经源性疾病)直接累及大脑引起的。这些现象应与第二种致病机制——心因性障碍——引起的紊乱区分开来。我们将心因性障碍定义为那些主要反映对艾滋病毒感染和/或疾病进展的知识的心理反应,以及由此产生的社会后果。在提出神经源性和心理源性分组时,我们并不打算回到古老的“身心”区分。我们充分认识到,大脑疾病能够而且确实会导致情绪、思想和行为方面的紊乱,而且先前存在的心理障碍实际上可能会因这种神经病理学的发作而严重恶化。然而,为了清楚起见,也为了确定适当的处理方法,我们认为我们提出的区别在启发式上是有用的。摆在我们面前的挑战包括更精确地确定艾滋病毒相关神经源性疾病的发病率和自然病程。虽然毫无疑问,CDC IV型个体在亚临床和临床“器质性精神”症状方面都有较高的患病率,但这些变化的发病时间和进展速度尚不清楚。目前看来,在HIV感染的早期,中枢神经系统可能没有受到影响;然而,在某种程度上,神经精神异常的发生率可能会增加,这可能与疾病免疫方面的进展没有直接关系。关于心理成因现象,很明显,焦虑综合征可以作为了解艾滋病毒血清状况的直接产物发生,并可能随着疾病的进展而加剧。也有可能艾滋病毒阳性个体的某些亚群(例如,军队样本)可能有更高的自杀风险。这些观察结果对针对这些群体的集中干预提出了挑战。在神经源性和心理源性现象学上积累的数据也强调了在神经行为和免疫病毒学术语中概念化HIV感染的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eating and its disorders. HIV, AIDS, and The Brain. Proceedings of the 72nd annual ARNMD meeting. New York, 1992. Laboratory basis of novel therapeutic strategies to prevent HIV-related neuronal injury. Cytokine expression and pathogenesis in AIDS brain. HIV-related depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1