Longer Patent Life Representing Higher Value? A Study on China Stock Market and China Patents

Hong-Wen Tsai, Hui-Chung Che, Bo Bai
{"title":"Longer Patent Life Representing Higher Value? A Study on China Stock Market and China Patents","authors":"Hong-Wen Tsai, Hui-Chung Che, Bo Bai","doi":"10.47260/bae/918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nBy setting the market capitalization as the frame of patent value reference, twenty-two quarter’s market capitalization from 2016Q1 to 2021Q2 of China listed companies (A-shares) were collected. All valid patent data of three patent species including the invention grant, the utility model grant and the design grant, were retrieved for calculating the average patent life of each A-share. The variances of the market capitalization via different patent life groups were analyzed via ANOVA. The A-shares having invention grant’s patent lives above the general level usually showed higher market capitalization means than the A-shares having invention grant’s patent lives below the general level. The invention grants with longer patent life might be regarded as the patents of higher value. The utility model grants with longer patent life might not be regarded as the patents of higher value because of poor significance. The design grant’s patent life was a significant indicator for discriminating China A-share’s market capitalization, however, the optimal patent life were close to but not longer than four years. The longer patent life of the design grants was not regarded as higher value.\n\nJEL classification numbers: C38, C46, G11, G12.\nKeywords: patent, market capitalization, China A-share, patent life, ANOVA.","PeriodicalId":344946,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Applied Economics","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47260/bae/918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract By setting the market capitalization as the frame of patent value reference, twenty-two quarter’s market capitalization from 2016Q1 to 2021Q2 of China listed companies (A-shares) were collected. All valid patent data of three patent species including the invention grant, the utility model grant and the design grant, were retrieved for calculating the average patent life of each A-share. The variances of the market capitalization via different patent life groups were analyzed via ANOVA. The A-shares having invention grant’s patent lives above the general level usually showed higher market capitalization means than the A-shares having invention grant’s patent lives below the general level. The invention grants with longer patent life might be regarded as the patents of higher value. The utility model grants with longer patent life might not be regarded as the patents of higher value because of poor significance. The design grant’s patent life was a significant indicator for discriminating China A-share’s market capitalization, however, the optimal patent life were close to but not longer than four years. The longer patent life of the design grants was not regarded as higher value. JEL classification numbers: C38, C46, G11, G12. Keywords: patent, market capitalization, China A-share, patent life, ANOVA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专利寿命越长价值越高?中国股票市场与中国专利研究
摘要以市值为专利价值参考框架,收集了2016年第一季度至2021第二季度中国上市公司(a股)22个季度的市值数据。检索发明授权、实用新型授权和外观设计授权三个专利种类的所有有效专利数据,计算每个a股的平均专利寿命。通过方差分析分析不同专利寿命组的市值差异。高于一般水平的发明授权专利期限的a股通常比低于一般水平的发明授权专利期限的a股表现出更高的市值。授予专利期限较长的发明可视为具有较高价值的专利。具有较长专利寿命的实用新型专利,由于重要性较差,可能不被视为具有较高价值的专利。外观设计专利期限是判别中国a股市值的重要指标,但最优专利期限接近但不超过4年。外观设计授权的专利期限越长,并不被视为价值越高。JEL分类号:C38、C46、G11、G12。关键词:专利,市值,中国a股,专利寿命,方差分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do Directors’ Remuneration and Remuneration Committees of the Board affect Bank’s Performance: Application of GMM model? Is There J-Curve Effect in the Services Trade in Canada? A Panel Data Analysis Effects of Expansionary Fiscal Policy in a Commodity-Exporting Economy: Evidence from Mongolia The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on earnings quality during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Evidence from the UK Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Volatility on Taiwan-China Trade: A Non-Linear ARDL Analysis of 20 Industries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1