Studies on pseudoisochromatic plates for classification of degrees of color vision deficiency

T. Hishida, R. Ito, Akiko Masudal, Susumu Isiguro, S. Tanabe
{"title":"Studies on pseudoisochromatic plates for classification of degrees of color vision deficiency","authors":"T. Hishida, R. Ito, Akiko Masudal, Susumu Isiguro, S. Tanabe","doi":"10.4263/JORTHOPTIC.36.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tokyo Medical College (TMC) plates and Okuma plates were evaluated as tools to classify degrees of color deficiency. These two pseudoisochromatic plates are most widely used in Japan. One hundred and twenty-eight protanopes, 427 deuteranopes, 187 protanomals and 445 deuteranomals, that is, 1187 cases in total were tested using several kinds of pseudoisochromatic plates, Panel D-15 test, JFC lantern test and anomaloscope. The results of TMC plates and Okuma plates were studied. Generally speaking, classification of degree with TMC plates was significantly more severe than that with Okuma plates. For instance, 96.9% of protanopes and 74.5% of deuteranopes were diagnosed as severe degree by TMC plates, while by Okuma plates, only 30% of protanopes and 53% of deuteranopes were the cases. Consequently, classifications of the two plates are inconsistent in majority. It is because the basis of classification differs from each other; hue discrimination in yellowred to yellow-green in TMC plates, while grade of desaturation in neutral colors in Okuma plates. Furthermore, the color differences used in the pseudoisochromatic plates are not sufficient enough to separate severe, moderate and mild ones, therefore individual variation or slight changes of test condition are likely to make the results confusing. After all, pseudoisochromatic plates alone are not valid for classification of degrees of color deficiency. Some other color vision tests should be combined for the purpose.","PeriodicalId":205688,"journal":{"name":"Japanese orthoptic journal","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese orthoptic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4263/JORTHOPTIC.36.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tokyo Medical College (TMC) plates and Okuma plates were evaluated as tools to classify degrees of color deficiency. These two pseudoisochromatic plates are most widely used in Japan. One hundred and twenty-eight protanopes, 427 deuteranopes, 187 protanomals and 445 deuteranomals, that is, 1187 cases in total were tested using several kinds of pseudoisochromatic plates, Panel D-15 test, JFC lantern test and anomaloscope. The results of TMC plates and Okuma plates were studied. Generally speaking, classification of degree with TMC plates was significantly more severe than that with Okuma plates. For instance, 96.9% of protanopes and 74.5% of deuteranopes were diagnosed as severe degree by TMC plates, while by Okuma plates, only 30% of protanopes and 53% of deuteranopes were the cases. Consequently, classifications of the two plates are inconsistent in majority. It is because the basis of classification differs from each other; hue discrimination in yellowred to yellow-green in TMC plates, while grade of desaturation in neutral colors in Okuma plates. Furthermore, the color differences used in the pseudoisochromatic plates are not sufficient enough to separate severe, moderate and mild ones, therefore individual variation or slight changes of test condition are likely to make the results confusing. After all, pseudoisochromatic plates alone are not valid for classification of degrees of color deficiency. Some other color vision tests should be combined for the purpose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
假等色印版色觉缺陷程度分类的研究
以东京医学院(Tokyo Medical College, TMC)版和Okuma版作为色差程度的分类工具。这两种伪等色版在日本应用最为广泛。采用几种假等色板、Panel D-15试验、JFC灯笼试验和异常镜对128个原异构体、427个氘异构体、187个原异构体和445个氘异构体共1187例进行了检测。研究了TMC板和Okuma板的实验结果。总的来说,TMC板的分类程度明显比Okuma板严重。例如,TMC板诊断为重度的原烷和氘烷分别为96.9%和74.5%,而Okuma板诊断为重度的原烷和氘烷分别为30%和53%。因此,两个板块的分类在大多数情况下是不一致的。这是因为分类的依据各不相同;TMC印版中黄红到黄绿的色相差别,而Okuma印版中中性色的去饱和等级。此外,假等色板所用的色差不足以区分严重、中度和轻度,因此个体差异或试验条件的微小变化可能使结果混淆。毕竟,假等色印版本身是不适合色差程度的分类的。其他一些色觉测试应该结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Haidinger's brushesをもちいた視覚健診の試み 地域と連携した視能訓練士教育への取り組み 1.患者団体の受け入れ反応 視能訓練士教育における検影法習得の試み : 第1報 教育プログラムと基本技術の習得 New Aniseikonia Testの可視光分析試験 「本音で語ろう間欠性外斜視」手術の立場から………外直筋後転術
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1