T. Hishida, R. Ito, Akiko Masudal, Susumu Isiguro, S. Tanabe
{"title":"Studies on pseudoisochromatic plates for classification of degrees of color vision deficiency","authors":"T. Hishida, R. Ito, Akiko Masudal, Susumu Isiguro, S. Tanabe","doi":"10.4263/JORTHOPTIC.36.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tokyo Medical College (TMC) plates and Okuma plates were evaluated as tools to classify degrees of color deficiency. These two pseudoisochromatic plates are most widely used in Japan. One hundred and twenty-eight protanopes, 427 deuteranopes, 187 protanomals and 445 deuteranomals, that is, 1187 cases in total were tested using several kinds of pseudoisochromatic plates, Panel D-15 test, JFC lantern test and anomaloscope. The results of TMC plates and Okuma plates were studied. Generally speaking, classification of degree with TMC plates was significantly more severe than that with Okuma plates. For instance, 96.9% of protanopes and 74.5% of deuteranopes were diagnosed as severe degree by TMC plates, while by Okuma plates, only 30% of protanopes and 53% of deuteranopes were the cases. Consequently, classifications of the two plates are inconsistent in majority. It is because the basis of classification differs from each other; hue discrimination in yellowred to yellow-green in TMC plates, while grade of desaturation in neutral colors in Okuma plates. Furthermore, the color differences used in the pseudoisochromatic plates are not sufficient enough to separate severe, moderate and mild ones, therefore individual variation or slight changes of test condition are likely to make the results confusing. After all, pseudoisochromatic plates alone are not valid for classification of degrees of color deficiency. Some other color vision tests should be combined for the purpose.","PeriodicalId":205688,"journal":{"name":"Japanese orthoptic journal","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese orthoptic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4263/JORTHOPTIC.36.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tokyo Medical College (TMC) plates and Okuma plates were evaluated as tools to classify degrees of color deficiency. These two pseudoisochromatic plates are most widely used in Japan. One hundred and twenty-eight protanopes, 427 deuteranopes, 187 protanomals and 445 deuteranomals, that is, 1187 cases in total were tested using several kinds of pseudoisochromatic plates, Panel D-15 test, JFC lantern test and anomaloscope. The results of TMC plates and Okuma plates were studied. Generally speaking, classification of degree with TMC plates was significantly more severe than that with Okuma plates. For instance, 96.9% of protanopes and 74.5% of deuteranopes were diagnosed as severe degree by TMC plates, while by Okuma plates, only 30% of protanopes and 53% of deuteranopes were the cases. Consequently, classifications of the two plates are inconsistent in majority. It is because the basis of classification differs from each other; hue discrimination in yellowred to yellow-green in TMC plates, while grade of desaturation in neutral colors in Okuma plates. Furthermore, the color differences used in the pseudoisochromatic plates are not sufficient enough to separate severe, moderate and mild ones, therefore individual variation or slight changes of test condition are likely to make the results confusing. After all, pseudoisochromatic plates alone are not valid for classification of degrees of color deficiency. Some other color vision tests should be combined for the purpose.
以东京医学院(Tokyo Medical College, TMC)版和Okuma版作为色差程度的分类工具。这两种伪等色版在日本应用最为广泛。采用几种假等色板、Panel D-15试验、JFC灯笼试验和异常镜对128个原异构体、427个氘异构体、187个原异构体和445个氘异构体共1187例进行了检测。研究了TMC板和Okuma板的实验结果。总的来说,TMC板的分类程度明显比Okuma板严重。例如,TMC板诊断为重度的原烷和氘烷分别为96.9%和74.5%,而Okuma板诊断为重度的原烷和氘烷分别为30%和53%。因此,两个板块的分类在大多数情况下是不一致的。这是因为分类的依据各不相同;TMC印版中黄红到黄绿的色相差别,而Okuma印版中中性色的去饱和等级。此外,假等色板所用的色差不足以区分严重、中度和轻度,因此个体差异或试验条件的微小变化可能使结果混淆。毕竟,假等色印版本身是不适合色差程度的分类的。其他一些色觉测试应该结合起来。