Cleft lip repair with subcuticular closure at National Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu: Is there any advantage?

I. Onah, U. Ogbonna, I. Ogbonnaya
{"title":"Cleft lip repair with subcuticular closure at National Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu: Is there any advantage?","authors":"I. Onah, U. Ogbonna, I. Ogbonnaya","doi":"10.4314/NJPSUR.V6I1.53590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Skin closure in unilateral cheiloplasty with non absorbable sutures is commonly practiced, resulting in longer hospitalisation and another anaesthetic session for suture removal in children; increasing costs and risks. Subcuticular suturing obviates crosshatching and may also result in a finer scar, an advantage in patients with oily pigmented skins. Subcuticular closure became routine in the hospital in 2004. This five year study was undertaken to verify if subcuticular closure in unilateral cleft lip surgery reduced the burden of care. Patients and methods : Consecutive patients with unilateral cleft lip repaired at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu from January 2004 to December 2008 were studied retrospectively. There were 33 patients with subcuticular sutures and 84 with skin sutures. The follow up was a month to four years. Result : Patients with skin suture had 124 surgical sessions and a mean of 7.11 days after surgery before discharge; and those with subcuticular sutures spent a mean of 2.43 days after surgery before discharge. Complications were similar in both groups. Subcuticular closure was associated with reduced hospitalisation time and anaesthetic sessions; reduced risks, costs, and burden of care. Conclusion : The technique of subcuticular suturing may be considered as a viable alternative to non absorbable skin sutures.","PeriodicalId":325435,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJPSUR.V6I1.53590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Skin closure in unilateral cheiloplasty with non absorbable sutures is commonly practiced, resulting in longer hospitalisation and another anaesthetic session for suture removal in children; increasing costs and risks. Subcuticular suturing obviates crosshatching and may also result in a finer scar, an advantage in patients with oily pigmented skins. Subcuticular closure became routine in the hospital in 2004. This five year study was undertaken to verify if subcuticular closure in unilateral cleft lip surgery reduced the burden of care. Patients and methods : Consecutive patients with unilateral cleft lip repaired at the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu from January 2004 to December 2008 were studied retrospectively. There were 33 patients with subcuticular sutures and 84 with skin sutures. The follow up was a month to four years. Result : Patients with skin suture had 124 surgical sessions and a mean of 7.11 days after surgery before discharge; and those with subcuticular sutures spent a mean of 2.43 days after surgery before discharge. Complications were similar in both groups. Subcuticular closure was associated with reduced hospitalisation time and anaesthetic sessions; reduced risks, costs, and burden of care. Conclusion : The technique of subcuticular suturing may be considered as a viable alternative to non absorbable skin sutures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃努古国家骨科医院的唇裂修补术:有什么优势吗?
背景:单侧颧骨成形术中皮肤闭合采用不可吸收缝合线是一种常见的做法,导致儿童住院时间较长,并且在拆除缝合线时需要再次麻醉;增加成本和风险。皮下缝合可以避免交叉交叉,也可以形成更细的疤痕,这对油性皮肤患者来说是一个优势。2004年,角膜下闭合成为医院的常规手术。这项为期五年的研究是为了验证单侧唇裂手术中是否进行了表皮下闭合手术,以减轻护理负担。患者和方法:回顾性分析2004年1月至2008年12月在埃努古国立骨科医院连续修复的单侧唇裂患者。皮下缝合33例,皮肤缝合84例。随访时间从一个月到四年不等。结果:皮肤缝合患者共手术124次,平均术后7.11 d出院;采用皮下缝合线的患者平均术后2.43天出院。两组并发症相似。皮下闭合与住院时间和麻醉时间缩短有关;降低风险、成本和护理负担。结论:皮下缝合技术是一种可行的替代皮肤不可吸收缝合线的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of aplasia cutis type VI (Bart’s syndrome) at University of Abuja Teaching Hospital Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria A prospective randomized comparative study of facial scar modulation using topical silicone gel versus coconut oil Tessier 4 right-sided orofacial cleft deformity with associated congenital limb anomalies − a case report and literature review Penile and scrotal defects post-Fournier gangrene: reconstructive options and challenges in resource limited settings Ectrodactyly or lobster claw feet: our surgical experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1