{"title":"Anti-Gender, Anti-University: \"Gender Ideology\" and the Future of US Higher Education","authors":"Liz Montegary","doi":"10.1353/ff.2022.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article illustrates how the global movement against \"gender ideology\" informs rightwing attacks on university-based research and mainstream academic institutions in the United States. I take as my starting point the figure of Robert Oscar Lopez—a \"pro-family\" activist who participated in anti-gender mobilizations in Western Europe as a tenured professor at a California public university. In addition to publishing numerous online pieces about the dangers of marriage equality and \"same-sex parenting,\" he has written extensively about US higher education and the difficulties he faced as a Brown, Christian, conservative professor. Through an examination of Lopez's essays on the university from 2012 (when he first spoke out against LGBT equality) to 2016 (when he resigned from his faculty position), I track the shifting contours of conservative hostility toward the academy amidst the resurgence of far-right populisms around the globe and the mainstreaming of ultraconservative ideas in US political culture.The first half of this article discusses the role counterknowledge production played in Lopez's \"pro-family\" activism. Taking cues from anti-gender campaigns in Western Europe—and building on the American right's ongoing efforts to produce \"academicized\" conservative expertise—Lopez sought to undermine marriage equality by debunking queer and feminist research and offering alternative perspectives on LGBT families. In the second half, I examine Lopez's drift farther rightward. While his early writing imagined the possibility of a politicized conservative intellectual movement, his later essays abandoned this fantasy and, instead, derided college degrees as wastes of money and denounced publicly funded education. I pay careful attention to Lopez's attempts to cast his anti-gender/anti-university position as advancing women's rights, racial justice, and anti-colonial resistance. In the process, this article provides insight into how far-right racial, gender, and sexual politics scramble conventional distinctions between the left and the right.","PeriodicalId":190295,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Formations","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Formations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2022.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract:This article illustrates how the global movement against "gender ideology" informs rightwing attacks on university-based research and mainstream academic institutions in the United States. I take as my starting point the figure of Robert Oscar Lopez—a "pro-family" activist who participated in anti-gender mobilizations in Western Europe as a tenured professor at a California public university. In addition to publishing numerous online pieces about the dangers of marriage equality and "same-sex parenting," he has written extensively about US higher education and the difficulties he faced as a Brown, Christian, conservative professor. Through an examination of Lopez's essays on the university from 2012 (when he first spoke out against LGBT equality) to 2016 (when he resigned from his faculty position), I track the shifting contours of conservative hostility toward the academy amidst the resurgence of far-right populisms around the globe and the mainstreaming of ultraconservative ideas in US political culture.The first half of this article discusses the role counterknowledge production played in Lopez's "pro-family" activism. Taking cues from anti-gender campaigns in Western Europe—and building on the American right's ongoing efforts to produce "academicized" conservative expertise—Lopez sought to undermine marriage equality by debunking queer and feminist research and offering alternative perspectives on LGBT families. In the second half, I examine Lopez's drift farther rightward. While his early writing imagined the possibility of a politicized conservative intellectual movement, his later essays abandoned this fantasy and, instead, derided college degrees as wastes of money and denounced publicly funded education. I pay careful attention to Lopez's attempts to cast his anti-gender/anti-university position as advancing women's rights, racial justice, and anti-colonial resistance. In the process, this article provides insight into how far-right racial, gender, and sexual politics scramble conventional distinctions between the left and the right.
摘要:本文阐述了反对“性别意识形态”的全球运动如何影响右翼对美国大学研究和主流学术机构的攻击。我以罗伯特·奥斯卡·洛佩斯(Robert Oscar lopez)作为我的出发点,他是一位“支持家庭”的活动家,作为加州一所公立大学的终身教授,他参与了西欧的反性别动员。除了在网上发表大量关于婚姻平等和“同性育儿”危险的文章外,他还撰写了大量关于美国高等教育的文章,以及他作为一名信奉基督教的布朗大学保守派教授所面临的困难。通过对洛佩兹从2012年(他第一次公开反对LGBT平等)到2016年(他辞去教职)关于哈佛大学的文章的研究,我追踪了在全球极右翼民粹主义复苏和美国政治文化中极端保守思想主流化的背景下,保守派对哈佛大学敌意的变化。本文的前半部分讨论了反知识生产在洛佩兹的“亲家庭”行动中所起的作用。从西欧的反性别运动中得到启发,并在美国右翼不断努力产生“学院化”的保守专业知识的基础上,洛佩兹试图通过揭穿酷儿和女权主义的研究,并提供关于LGBT家庭的另一种观点,来破坏婚姻平等。在下半场,我考察了洛佩斯的右前卫。虽然他早期的作品想象了一场政治化的保守知识分子运动的可能性,但他后来的文章放弃了这种幻想,而是嘲笑大学学位是浪费钱,谴责公共资助的教育。我特别注意到洛佩兹试图将他的反性别/反大学立场描述为促进妇女权利、种族正义和反殖民抵抗。在此过程中,本文提供了对极右翼种族、性别和性政治如何争夺左翼和右翼之间传统区别的见解。