Can the Subaltern Be Global? African Perspectives on the Structure of Globalization

Tezera Tazebew
{"title":"Can the Subaltern Be Global? African Perspectives on the Structure of Globalization","authors":"Tezera Tazebew","doi":"10.1002/J.2573-508X.2018.TB000063.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Page 176 Africa in the World: Shifting Boundaries and Knowledge Production and treatment agendas of many global and public health efforts all over the world. While numerous studies have examined the barriers along the HIV cascade of care that make eradicating AIDS a challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, fewer research projects have centered on the local impact of these biomedical HIV interventions from the perspectives and experiences of those living on the ground and in communities where eradication is underway. Drawing on ethnographic research in a highway trading center in Kenya, as well as Tsing’s notion of friction, this paper demonstrates how current global heath technologies used to eradicate AIDS (e.g. HIV tests, HAART) when inserted into particular social, moral, and political contexts, sometimes get put to use in unexpected ways, including for local projects aimed at (re)negotiating gender dynamics and inequalities. Richard Schroeder, Rutgers University Remote Control: Conservation Surveillance and Technologies of Power Power is increasingly being deployed by well-placed conservation actors over species and spaces of concern through sophisticated – in many cases modified military – technologies which seek to manage, govern, and produce knowledge about habitats and the bodies of non-human subjects; for example, see the use of conservation drones, camera traps, realtime monitoring, satellite based remote sensing platforms, microphones/bioacoustic sensors, critter cams, radar, subcutaneous internal monitoring, and dna forensic sampling. Additionally, computers running state-of-the-art programs, complicated algorithms, and ecological models, are increasingly being called upon in conservation for predictive purposes to anticipate how climate change might impact species ranges, how environmental conditions and weather events might impact migration, even how a particular animal might behave in response to given stimuli, in effect distancing researcher from subject as they are made virtual objects of management. In my presentation, I will review technologies being deployed at the frontier of conservation, and I will discuss the meaning of these changes for how researchers relate to non-human species. I will analyze how and where power is expressed through these new techniques, and consider potential consequences of such modes of governance for both humans and non-humans. Tezera Tazebew, University of Gondar Can the Subaltern Be Global? African Perspectives on the Structure of Globalization We live in an age defined by globalization. Worldwide, the quintessential transformation of our age is globalization. Africa’s place in the world can’t be rightly examined without a due attention be given to globalization. Much has been said, and written about the globalizing world where we live now and the benefits and impacts of globalization to Africa. Often the beneficiaries are assumed to the free traders, the powerful multinational corporations, and African elites. In this view, globalization is taken to be the sport of the ‘Westerners’, Europeans and North Americans. The non-Westerners are the dominated, subordinated subjects. This essay attempts to provide a critical reflection on globalization in Africa. After historical-qualitative analysis, the paper argues that even if marginalized, the subalterns still display multifaceted agency in the globalization processes. Everyday lived experiences of the ordinary people are indications how the subaltern be globalized in the African context. Robert Thornton, University of the Witwatersrand Artisanal Craft and Expert Knowledge in Africa: The Neglected Role of Specialised and Individualised Knowledge Practices Generalising, we can say that African knowledge and technologies are usually attributed to ‘cultures’, or ‘societies’, when in fact specialised knowledge is held and practiced by individuals or restricted ‘schools’ or guilds. The personal, specialised, restricted, even","PeriodicalId":443445,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the African Futures Conference","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the African Futures Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2573-508X.2018.TB000063.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Page 176 Africa in the World: Shifting Boundaries and Knowledge Production and treatment agendas of many global and public health efforts all over the world. While numerous studies have examined the barriers along the HIV cascade of care that make eradicating AIDS a challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, fewer research projects have centered on the local impact of these biomedical HIV interventions from the perspectives and experiences of those living on the ground and in communities where eradication is underway. Drawing on ethnographic research in a highway trading center in Kenya, as well as Tsing’s notion of friction, this paper demonstrates how current global heath technologies used to eradicate AIDS (e.g. HIV tests, HAART) when inserted into particular social, moral, and political contexts, sometimes get put to use in unexpected ways, including for local projects aimed at (re)negotiating gender dynamics and inequalities. Richard Schroeder, Rutgers University Remote Control: Conservation Surveillance and Technologies of Power Power is increasingly being deployed by well-placed conservation actors over species and spaces of concern through sophisticated – in many cases modified military – technologies which seek to manage, govern, and produce knowledge about habitats and the bodies of non-human subjects; for example, see the use of conservation drones, camera traps, realtime monitoring, satellite based remote sensing platforms, microphones/bioacoustic sensors, critter cams, radar, subcutaneous internal monitoring, and dna forensic sampling. Additionally, computers running state-of-the-art programs, complicated algorithms, and ecological models, are increasingly being called upon in conservation for predictive purposes to anticipate how climate change might impact species ranges, how environmental conditions and weather events might impact migration, even how a particular animal might behave in response to given stimuli, in effect distancing researcher from subject as they are made virtual objects of management. In my presentation, I will review technologies being deployed at the frontier of conservation, and I will discuss the meaning of these changes for how researchers relate to non-human species. I will analyze how and where power is expressed through these new techniques, and consider potential consequences of such modes of governance for both humans and non-humans. Tezera Tazebew, University of Gondar Can the Subaltern Be Global? African Perspectives on the Structure of Globalization We live in an age defined by globalization. Worldwide, the quintessential transformation of our age is globalization. Africa’s place in the world can’t be rightly examined without a due attention be given to globalization. Much has been said, and written about the globalizing world where we live now and the benefits and impacts of globalization to Africa. Often the beneficiaries are assumed to the free traders, the powerful multinational corporations, and African elites. In this view, globalization is taken to be the sport of the ‘Westerners’, Europeans and North Americans. The non-Westerners are the dominated, subordinated subjects. This essay attempts to provide a critical reflection on globalization in Africa. After historical-qualitative analysis, the paper argues that even if marginalized, the subalterns still display multifaceted agency in the globalization processes. Everyday lived experiences of the ordinary people are indications how the subaltern be globalized in the African context. Robert Thornton, University of the Witwatersrand Artisanal Craft and Expert Knowledge in Africa: The Neglected Role of Specialised and Individualised Knowledge Practices Generalising, we can say that African knowledge and technologies are usually attributed to ‘cultures’, or ‘societies’, when in fact specialised knowledge is held and practiced by individuals or restricted ‘schools’ or guilds. The personal, specialised, restricted, even
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
次等人能成为全球性的吗?非洲对全球化结构的看法
世界上的非洲:不断变化的边界和世界各地许多全球和公共卫生努力的知识生产和治疗议程。虽然有许多研究考察了使撒哈拉以南非洲根除艾滋病成为一项挑战的艾滋病毒级联护理方面的障碍,但很少有研究项目从生活在实地和正在进行根除的社区的人的角度和经验来关注这些生物医学艾滋病毒干预措施的当地影响。本文利用肯尼亚高速公路贸易中心的人种学研究,以及青的摩擦概念,展示了当前用于根除艾滋病的全球卫生技术(例如艾滋病毒检测、HAART)在插入特定的社会、道德和政治背景时,有时会以意想不到的方式得到使用,包括用于旨在(重新)谈判性别动态和不平等的地方项目。理查德·施罗德(Rutgers University),远程控制:保护监视和权力技术权力正越来越多地被处于有利位置的保护行动者利用复杂的技术(在许多情况下是改良的军事技术)来管理、治理和产生关于栖息地和非人类主体身体的知识;例如,使用保护无人机、相机陷阱、实时监测、卫星遥感平台、麦克风/生物声学传感器、生物摄像头、雷达、皮下内部监测和DNA法医采样。此外,计算机运行最先进的程序,复杂的算法和生态模型,越来越多地被用于预测保护目的,预测气候变化如何影响物种范围,环境条件和天气事件如何影响迁徙,甚至特定动物如何对给定的刺激做出反应,实际上使研究人员与受试者保持距离,因为他们成为管理的虚拟对象。在我的演讲中,我将回顾在保护前沿部署的技术,并讨论这些变化对研究人员如何与非人类物种联系的意义。我将分析权力是如何以及在哪里通过这些新技术表达的,并考虑这种治理模式对人类和非人类的潜在后果。泰泽拉·塔泽贝(Tezera Tazebew),贡达大学我们生活在一个以全球化为特征的时代。在世界范围内,我们这个时代最典型的转变是全球化。如果不对全球化给予应有的重视,就不能正确地审视非洲在世界上的地位。关于我们现在生活的全球化世界以及全球化对非洲的好处和影响,人们已经说了很多,写了很多。通常,受益者被认为是自由贸易者、强大的跨国公司和非洲精英。在这种观点中,全球化被认为是“西方人”、欧洲人和北美人的运动。非西方人是受支配的、从属的主体。这篇文章试图对非洲的全球化提供一个批判性的反思。通过历史定性分析,本文认为,即使被边缘化,在全球化进程中,底层人民仍然表现出多方面的能动性。普通人的日常生活经历表明,在非洲的背景下,下层社会是如何全球化的。概括地说,我们可以说非洲的知识和技术通常被归因于“文化”或“社会”,而实际上,专业知识是由个人或受限制的“学校”或行会掌握和实践的。个人的,专业的,有限的,甚至
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Land, Laws, and Legal Subjectivities in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone Seeing African Cities: New Urbanites - New Cityscapes? Understanding Global Health from the Homestead: Knowledge-Being in Multiple Worlds Medicine Killings, Abduction of People with Albinism, Wealth and Prosperity in North Malawi: A Historical Assessment Welcome Message from Co-Sponsoring Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1