Inconsistency Management between Architectural Decisions and Designs Using Constraints and Model Fixes

Ioanna Lytra, Uwe Zdun
{"title":"Inconsistency Management between Architectural Decisions and Designs Using Constraints and Model Fixes","authors":"Ioanna Lytra, Uwe Zdun","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2014.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The software architecture community has proposed to document the design rationale of software architectures by means of architectural design decisions (ADDs). The constant evolution of software systems requires that both architectural designs and corresponding ADDs are continuously documented and synchronized. However, in practice, designs and ADDs become inconsistent over time. Usually, the potential inconsistencies need to be detected and resolved manually. We propose to alleviate this problem by providing semi-automated support for detecting and handling these inconsistencies. For this, we use constraints for consistency checking between reusable ADDs and component-and-connector (C&C) models. These constraints apply on the C&C models and their invalidation is resolved by software architects either 1) by executing automatically suggested model fixes on the C&C models, or 2) by reconsidering ADDs and subsequently updating the corresponding C&C diagrams, in order to align designs to decisions. We demonstrate our approach in the context of a case study and evaluate its efficiency and scalability.","PeriodicalId":430257,"journal":{"name":"2014 23rd Australian Software Engineering Conference","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 23rd Australian Software Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2014.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The software architecture community has proposed to document the design rationale of software architectures by means of architectural design decisions (ADDs). The constant evolution of software systems requires that both architectural designs and corresponding ADDs are continuously documented and synchronized. However, in practice, designs and ADDs become inconsistent over time. Usually, the potential inconsistencies need to be detected and resolved manually. We propose to alleviate this problem by providing semi-automated support for detecting and handling these inconsistencies. For this, we use constraints for consistency checking between reusable ADDs and component-and-connector (C&C) models. These constraints apply on the C&C models and their invalidation is resolved by software architects either 1) by executing automatically suggested model fixes on the C&C models, or 2) by reconsidering ADDs and subsequently updating the corresponding C&C diagrams, in order to align designs to decisions. We demonstrate our approach in the context of a case study and evaluate its efficiency and scalability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用约束和模型修复的架构决策和设计之间的不一致管理
软件体系结构社区已经建议通过体系结构设计决策(add)来记录软件体系结构的设计原理。软件系统的不断发展要求体系结构设计和相应的add都不断地记录和同步。然而,在实践中,随着时间的推移,设计和添加变得不一致。通常,需要手动检测和解决潜在的不一致。我们建议通过为检测和处理这些不一致提供半自动支持来缓解这个问题。为此,我们使用约束来检查可重用的add和组件与连接器(C&C)模型之间的一致性。这些约束适用于C&C模型,它们的无效由软件架构师解决,或者1)通过在C&C模型上自动执行建议的模型修复,或者2)通过重新考虑add并随后更新相应的C&C图,以便使设计与决策保持一致。我们在案例研究的背景下演示了我们的方法,并评估了其效率和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Requirements Prioritization and Next-Release Problem under Non-additive Value Conditions Design and Implementation of Dynamically Evolving Ensembles with the Helena Framework The Role of Boundary Objects in the Fuzzy Front End of IT Development A Comprehensive Pattern-Driven Security Methodology for Distributed Systems On the Shape of Circular Dependencies in Java Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1