Investigating understandings of critical literacies among Finnish and Canadian teachers

Eleni Louloudi
{"title":"Investigating understandings of critical literacies among Finnish and Canadian teachers","authors":"Eleni Louloudi","doi":"10.47862/apples.112308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical literacy has been defined as the use of analog and digital materials towards questioning and deconstructing problematic and oppressive societal norms and further reconstructing more socially just narratives. Even though critical literacy is a well-known concept in many English-speaking countries, its application and significance in Europe have not been sufficiently investigated. As a result, this dissimilar study of the concept can be reflected in teachers’ understandings of it in theory and in practice. This contribution focuses on exploring and reconstructing teachers’ perspectives of critical literacies comparatively. More specifically, the article highlights similarities and differences in the way teachers from Canada and Finland think of the definition and implementation of critical literacies in their own situated, socio-cultural and socio-educational contexts. The study is based on theory-generating expert interviews and a comparative case study design, and the analysis of the data follows a grounded theory framework. The main results show a considerable convergence in perspectives; while Canadian teachers explored connections of critical literacies with social justice education, Finnish teachers rather highlighted ideas of information management and multiliteracies. Nevertheless, there were noticeable connections among these perceptions which are relevant for the development of the field and are further explored in the discussion part of this article.","PeriodicalId":409563,"journal":{"name":"Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47862/apples.112308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Critical literacy has been defined as the use of analog and digital materials towards questioning and deconstructing problematic and oppressive societal norms and further reconstructing more socially just narratives. Even though critical literacy is a well-known concept in many English-speaking countries, its application and significance in Europe have not been sufficiently investigated. As a result, this dissimilar study of the concept can be reflected in teachers’ understandings of it in theory and in practice. This contribution focuses on exploring and reconstructing teachers’ perspectives of critical literacies comparatively. More specifically, the article highlights similarities and differences in the way teachers from Canada and Finland think of the definition and implementation of critical literacies in their own situated, socio-cultural and socio-educational contexts. The study is based on theory-generating expert interviews and a comparative case study design, and the analysis of the data follows a grounded theory framework. The main results show a considerable convergence in perspectives; while Canadian teachers explored connections of critical literacies with social justice education, Finnish teachers rather highlighted ideas of information management and multiliteracies. Nevertheless, there were noticeable connections among these perceptions which are relevant for the development of the field and are further explored in the discussion part of this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查芬兰和加拿大教师对批判性素养的理解
批判性素养被定义为使用模拟和数字材料来质疑和解构有问题的和压迫性的社会规范,并进一步重建更社会公正的叙事。尽管批判性读写能力在许多英语国家是一个众所周知的概念,但它在欧洲的应用和意义却没有得到充分的研究。因此,这种对概念的差异性研究可以反映在教师在理论和实践中对概念的理解上。这篇文章的重点是比较地探索和重建教师的批判性素养观。更具体地说,这篇文章强调了加拿大和芬兰教师在各自的社会文化和社会教育背景下思考批判性素养的定义和实施方式的异同。本研究基于产生理论的专家访谈和比较案例研究设计,数据分析遵循扎根的理论框架。主要结果显示在观点上有相当大的趋同;加拿大教师探讨了批判性素养与社会正义教育的联系,而芬兰教师则强调了信息管理和多元素养的理念。然而,这些观点之间存在着明显的联系,这些联系与该领域的发展有关,并将在本文的讨论部分进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vocational teachers as policy actors “We don’t have it in my mother tongue” Reviewing research methods on adult migrants’ digital literacy Centering indigenous knowledge through multimodal approaches in English first additional language learning "In teacher work you must understand others and have empathy for them!”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1