Best view methods suitability for different types of objects

Júlia Kucerová, I. Varhanikova, Z. Černeková
{"title":"Best view methods suitability for different types of objects","authors":"Júlia Kucerová, I. Varhanikova, Z. Černeková","doi":"10.1145/2448531.2448538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present three approaches to the best view selection for 3D objects, in order to find the proper combination. The first method is based on geometry and uses the maximum amount of visible vertices. The second method uses the visual attention model and the third one calculates the amount of information in a scene after projecting the 3D scene to the 2D image using entropy. Several 3D models from Blender are used in the experiment. We compare these different approaches and explore their suitability on various objects. An online questionnaire is made to find out which of the tested images fits better to the human tastes.","PeriodicalId":235681,"journal":{"name":"Spring conference on Computer graphics","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spring conference on Computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2448531.2448538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper, we present three approaches to the best view selection for 3D objects, in order to find the proper combination. The first method is based on geometry and uses the maximum amount of visible vertices. The second method uses the visual attention model and the third one calculates the amount of information in a scene after projecting the 3D scene to the 2D image using entropy. Several 3D models from Blender are used in the experiment. We compare these different approaches and explore their suitability on various objects. An online questionnaire is made to find out which of the tested images fits better to the human tastes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最佳视图方法适合不同类型的对象
在本文中,我们提出了三种方法来选择3D物体的最佳视图,以便找到合适的组合。第一种方法是基于几何,并使用最大数量的可见顶点。第二种方法使用视觉注意模型,第三种方法使用熵将3D场景投影到2D图像后计算场景中的信息量。实验中使用了Blender的几个3D模型。我们比较了这些不同的方法,并探讨了它们在不同对象上的适用性。一份在线调查问卷的目的是找出哪张图片更符合人类的口味。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smoothing in 3D with reference points and polynomials Green's function solution to subsurface light transport for BRDF computation Doppler-based 3D Blood Flow Imaging and Visualization Parallel MDOM for light transport in participating media Dynamic Texture Enlargement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1