ELT written discourse vs. a teacher’s speech: experience of Critical Discourse Analysis

M. Suknov, N. Krynska
{"title":"ELT written discourse vs. a teacher’s speech: experience of Critical Discourse Analysis","authors":"M. Suknov, N. Krynska","doi":"10.36534/erlj.2020.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to contrast examples of teachers’ speech as spoken pedagogic discourse with the written discourse of a Teacher’s book enclosed with an international English language teaching (ELT)). During any EFL (English as a Foreign Language) lesson based on published ELT materials, a teacher uses printed texts of ELT materials, adjuncts and expands them in the learning process according to a particular educational setting and learning needs. The teacher sets tasks from a textbook but articulates them through his/her own interpretation related to local educational paradigm and social ideology. Being a mediator between the written discourse of ELT materials and the learners, the teacher produces his/her speech, which presents another example of pedagogic discourse. Applying methods of critical discourse analysis (CDA) we compare examples of the written discourse of the Teacher’s book (TB) and the teacher’s spoken discourse. We analysed how the latter was developed on the basis of a detailed lesson plan from the Teacher’s book (TB). The comparative analysis reveals a difference between the spoken teacher’s discourse derived from the discourse of ELT materials and the written discourse of the TB in that it shows the dominance of the teacher’s discourse within the local educational paradigm over those who produce such ELT materials.","PeriodicalId":270557,"journal":{"name":"Educational Role of Language Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Role of Language Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36534/erlj.2020.01.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to contrast examples of teachers’ speech as spoken pedagogic discourse with the written discourse of a Teacher’s book enclosed with an international English language teaching (ELT)). During any EFL (English as a Foreign Language) lesson based on published ELT materials, a teacher uses printed texts of ELT materials, adjuncts and expands them in the learning process according to a particular educational setting and learning needs. The teacher sets tasks from a textbook but articulates them through his/her own interpretation related to local educational paradigm and social ideology. Being a mediator between the written discourse of ELT materials and the learners, the teacher produces his/her speech, which presents another example of pedagogic discourse. Applying methods of critical discourse analysis (CDA) we compare examples of the written discourse of the Teacher’s book (TB) and the teacher’s spoken discourse. We analysed how the latter was developed on the basis of a detailed lesson plan from the Teacher’s book (TB). The comparative analysis reveals a difference between the spoken teacher’s discourse derived from the discourse of ELT materials and the written discourse of the TB in that it shows the dominance of the teacher’s discourse within the local educational paradigm over those who produce such ELT materials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语写作语篇与教师演讲:批判性语篇分析的经验
这篇文章的目的是对比教师演讲的例子作为口语教学话语与书面话语的教师的书,附在一个国际英语语言教学(ELT)。在任何以出版的英语教材为基础的EFL(作为外语的英语)课程中,教师都会根据特定的教育环境和学习需要,在学习过程中使用英语教材的印刷文本,对其进行辅助和扩展。教师根据教科书设定任务,但通过与当地教育范式和社会意识形态相关的自己的解释来阐明任务。教师作为英语教学材料的书面语篇和学习者之间的中介,产生了他/她的话语,这是教学语篇的另一个例子。运用批判性话语分析(CDA)的方法,我们比较了教师的书(TB)的书面话语和教师的口语话语的例子。我们根据教师书(TB)的详细课程计划分析了后者是如何发展的。对比分析揭示了由英语教学材料话语衍生而来的口语教师话语与英语教学材料的书面话语之间的差异,因为它显示了教师话语在当地教育范式中的主导地位,而不是那些制作这种英语教学材料的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Affect behind the use of anglicisms among adolescents in North Macedonia - causes and consequences Emotions, orientations and intentions for linguistic variations: Guide for language teaching - a report Emotions in language learning and use - 6th International pedagogical and linguistic conference, Ulm University, Germany Emotions in Norwegian language debate Incorporating literature in EFL classroom: attitudes and experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1