The Comparison Performance of MPPT Perturb and Observe, Fuzzy Logic Controller, and Flower Pollination Algorithm in Normal and Partial Shading Condition

Mohammad Agung Dirmawan, Suhariningsih, Renny Rakhmawati
{"title":"The Comparison Performance of MPPT Perturb and Observe, Fuzzy Logic Controller, and Flower Pollination Algorithm in Normal and Partial Shading Condition","authors":"Mohammad Agung Dirmawan, Suhariningsih, Renny Rakhmawati","doi":"10.1109/IES50839.2020.9231753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efficiency of photovoltaic can be optimal with power tracking system. Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) is static tracking to harvest the electrical energy of photovoltaic module. Photovoltaic module can optimal generated energy in ideal condition that mean irradiation condition about 1000 W/m2 and temperature of 25ºC without shadow on surface of photovoltaic module. However, the implementation photovoltaic work in static and dynamic weather. Surface of photovoltaic module it is often blocked by a shadow like a tree, building, dust and any object around photovoltaic module. This problem resulted two or more peak power on P-V curve. This condition is called partial shading. Partial shading can’t be solved by using the conventional method therefore artificial intelligent method is needed. Hence, this paper comparison some method of MPPT that is Perturb and Observe, Fuzzy Logic Controller, and Flower Pollination Algorithm for normal and partial shading condition. MPPT using Zeta converter to control switching duty cycle. The performance of three methods is tested simulation by PSIM. Result from simulation show that the Fuzzy Logic Controller the best solution in normal condition with accuracy more than 99% and response to convergence. The other hand, Flower Pollination Algorithm method is the best solution for partial shading condition without oscillation and accuracy more than 98%.","PeriodicalId":344685,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Electronics Symposium (IES)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Electronics Symposium (IES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IES50839.2020.9231753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Efficiency of photovoltaic can be optimal with power tracking system. Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) is static tracking to harvest the electrical energy of photovoltaic module. Photovoltaic module can optimal generated energy in ideal condition that mean irradiation condition about 1000 W/m2 and temperature of 25ºC without shadow on surface of photovoltaic module. However, the implementation photovoltaic work in static and dynamic weather. Surface of photovoltaic module it is often blocked by a shadow like a tree, building, dust and any object around photovoltaic module. This problem resulted two or more peak power on P-V curve. This condition is called partial shading. Partial shading can’t be solved by using the conventional method therefore artificial intelligent method is needed. Hence, this paper comparison some method of MPPT that is Perturb and Observe, Fuzzy Logic Controller, and Flower Pollination Algorithm for normal and partial shading condition. MPPT using Zeta converter to control switching duty cycle. The performance of three methods is tested simulation by PSIM. Result from simulation show that the Fuzzy Logic Controller the best solution in normal condition with accuracy more than 99% and response to convergence. The other hand, Flower Pollination Algorithm method is the best solution for partial shading condition without oscillation and accuracy more than 98%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MPPT摄动与观察、模糊逻辑控制器和授粉算法在正常和部分遮阳条件下的性能比较
通过电力跟踪系统可以优化光伏发电效率。最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)是一种静态跟踪,用于获取光伏组件的电能。光伏组件在平均辐照条件为1000w /m2左右,温度为25℃,光伏组件表面无阴影的理想状态下,可以获得最优的发电量。然而,实施光伏工作在静态和动态天气。光伏组件表面经常被阴影遮挡,如树木、建筑物、灰尘和光伏组件周围的任何物体。这一问题导致P-V曲线出现两个或多个峰值功率。这种情况称为部分遮阳。传统方法无法解决部分遮阳问题,因此需要人工智能方法。因此,本文比较了正常遮阳和部分遮阳条件下MPPT的几种方法,即摄动观察、模糊逻辑控制器和授粉算法。MPPT采用Zeta变换器控制开关占空比。通过PSIM仿真测试了三种方法的性能。仿真结果表明,该模糊控制器在正常情况下具有最优解,精度大于99%,且具有收敛性。另一方面,Flower Pollination Algorithm方法是部分遮阳条件下无振荡的最佳解决方案,精度超过98%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IES 2020 Cover Page Performance Improvement Based on Modified Lossless Quantization (MLQ) for Secret Key Generation Extracted from Received Signal Strength Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols AODV, OLSR and DSDV on MANET using NS3 Particle Swarm Optimization Implementation as MPPT on Hybrid Power System Data Analytics Implementation for Surabaya City Emergency Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1