Between Awareness and Acceptance: a more mature School Teachers? Perspective on Integrated Learning one year after the pandemic outbreak

IxD&A Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.55612/s-5002-052-002
C. Giovannella
{"title":"Between Awareness and Acceptance: a more mature School Teachers? Perspective on Integrated Learning one year after the pandemic outbreak","authors":"C. Giovannella","doi":"10.55612/s-5002-052-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One year after the outbreak of the pandemic that provoked a forced and massive adoption of technology enhanced learning practices, followed by a continuous evolution of their delivery modalities (on-line learning, blended learning, parallel blended learning, hybrid learning) and, finally, by a strong commitment to come back to a “new normal”, we have investigated, by mean of a survey, the evolution of: a) perceptions and perspectives of Italian school’s teachers about integrated learning; b) the undergoing innovation process characterized by unprecedented features and vastness. The exploration has been conducted by integrating perspectives and factors introduced in the past by several models - TAM, UTAUT, DOI, TOE, KAM - to describe technology innovation and adoption processes. We observed a higher perceived teachers' technological and pedagogical preparation, together with a higher readiness of the schools to react to unexpected events or sudden prescriptions. A readiness that should be ascribed mainly to the quality of the management and to an increase in the level of collaboration and cohesion among the actors of the learning process, rather than to an enhancement of the technological infrastructures. Collaboration, indeed, emerges as the main peculiarity of this last year, an engine capable to foster the spread of competences and a beacon capable to guide the choice of teaching practices. The influence of contextual factors appears not relevant and that of the “perceived values” somewhat marginal. As far as the innovation process: the awareness phase developed satisfactory and, in parallel, the acceptance phase also started. The possible transition to the adoption phase appears uncertain and not easy to characterize. At the time of the survey, however, the teachers perceived, the integrated learning as a modality that could be used in the future to realize 36% of the school activities.","PeriodicalId":377274,"journal":{"name":"IxD&A","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IxD&A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-052-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

One year after the outbreak of the pandemic that provoked a forced and massive adoption of technology enhanced learning practices, followed by a continuous evolution of their delivery modalities (on-line learning, blended learning, parallel blended learning, hybrid learning) and, finally, by a strong commitment to come back to a “new normal”, we have investigated, by mean of a survey, the evolution of: a) perceptions and perspectives of Italian school’s teachers about integrated learning; b) the undergoing innovation process characterized by unprecedented features and vastness. The exploration has been conducted by integrating perspectives and factors introduced in the past by several models - TAM, UTAUT, DOI, TOE, KAM - to describe technology innovation and adoption processes. We observed a higher perceived teachers' technological and pedagogical preparation, together with a higher readiness of the schools to react to unexpected events or sudden prescriptions. A readiness that should be ascribed mainly to the quality of the management and to an increase in the level of collaboration and cohesion among the actors of the learning process, rather than to an enhancement of the technological infrastructures. Collaboration, indeed, emerges as the main peculiarity of this last year, an engine capable to foster the spread of competences and a beacon capable to guide the choice of teaching practices. The influence of contextual factors appears not relevant and that of the “perceived values” somewhat marginal. As far as the innovation process: the awareness phase developed satisfactory and, in parallel, the acceptance phase also started. The possible transition to the adoption phase appears uncertain and not easy to characterize. At the time of the survey, however, the teachers perceived, the integrated learning as a modality that could be used in the future to realize 36% of the school activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在意识和接受之间:一个更成熟的学校教师?大流行爆发一年后对综合学习的展望
疫情爆发一年后,人们被迫大规模采用技术强化的学习方法,随后这些方法的提供方式不断演变(在线学习、混合学习、平行混合学习、混合学习),最后,通过一项调查,我们调查了以下方面的演变:a)意大利学校教师对综合学习的看法和观点;B,正在进行的具有前所未有的特点和广度的创新过程。本文通过整合TAM、UTAUT、DOI、TOE、KAM等模型中引入的观点和因素来描述技术创新和采用过程。我们观察到,教师的技术和教学准备程度更高,学校对意外事件或突然的处方做出反应的准备程度更高。这种准备工作应主要归功于管理的质量和学习过程参与者之间协作和凝聚力的提高,而不是技术基础结构的加强。事实上,合作是去年的主要特点,是促进能力传播的引擎,是指导教学实践选择的灯塔。背景因素的影响似乎不相关,而“感知价值”的影响则有些边缘化。就创新过程而言:意识阶段发展得令人满意,同时,接受阶段也开始了。可能过渡到采用阶段似乎是不确定的,而且不容易描述。然而,在调查时,教师认为整合学习是一种可以在未来用于实现36%的学校活动的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guidelines for the Visual Design of Mobile Application Icons. An Experiential Case Study Staying Connected with Aged Populations in Times of COVID-19: An Interview Study of the Role of Portuguese Institutions and Municipalities Wrist-worn Vibrotactile Navigation System for Cyclists Active ageing with digital technology: seniors' usages and attitudes User Satisfaction with Computer-Based Test (CBT): The Mediating Role of CBT Centre Service Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1