Automated Analysis of Drawing Process for Detecting Prodromal and Clinical Dementia

Yasunori Yamada, Masatomo Kobayashi, Kaoru Shinkawa, M. Nemoto, Miho Ota, K. Nemoto, T. Arai
{"title":"Automated Analysis of Drawing Process for Detecting Prodromal and Clinical Dementia","authors":"Yasunori Yamada, Masatomo Kobayashi, Kaoru Shinkawa, M. Nemoto, Miho Ota, K. Nemoto, T. Arai","doi":"10.1109/ICDH55609.2022.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early diagnosis of dementia, particularly in the prodromal stage (i.e., mild cognitive impairment, or MCI), has become a research and clinical priority but remains challenging. Automated analysis of the drawing process has been studied as a promising means for screening prodromal and clinical dementia, providing multifaceted information encompassing features, such as drawing speed, pen posture, writing pressure, and pauses. We examined the feasibility of using these features not only for detecting prodromal and clinical dementia but also for predicting the severity of cognitive impairments assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as well as the severity of neuropathological changes assessed by medial temporal lobe (MTL) atrophy. We collected drawing data with a digitizing tablet and pen from 145 older adults of cognitively normal (CN), MCI, and dementia. The nested cross-validation results indicate that the combination of drawing features could be used to classify CN, MCI, and dementia with an AUC of 0.909 and 75.1% accuracy (CN vs. MCI: 82.4% accuracy; CN vs. dementia: 92.2% accuracy; MCI vs. dementia: 80.3% accuracy) and predict MMSE scores with an $R2$ of 0.491 and severity of MTL atrophy with an $R2$ of 0.293. Our findings suggest that automated analysis of the drawing process can provide information about cognitive impairments and neuropathological changes due to dementia, which can help identify prodromal and clinical dementia as a digital biomarker.","PeriodicalId":120923,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH)","volume":"241 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDH55609.2022.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Early diagnosis of dementia, particularly in the prodromal stage (i.e., mild cognitive impairment, or MCI), has become a research and clinical priority but remains challenging. Automated analysis of the drawing process has been studied as a promising means for screening prodromal and clinical dementia, providing multifaceted information encompassing features, such as drawing speed, pen posture, writing pressure, and pauses. We examined the feasibility of using these features not only for detecting prodromal and clinical dementia but also for predicting the severity of cognitive impairments assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as well as the severity of neuropathological changes assessed by medial temporal lobe (MTL) atrophy. We collected drawing data with a digitizing tablet and pen from 145 older adults of cognitively normal (CN), MCI, and dementia. The nested cross-validation results indicate that the combination of drawing features could be used to classify CN, MCI, and dementia with an AUC of 0.909 and 75.1% accuracy (CN vs. MCI: 82.4% accuracy; CN vs. dementia: 92.2% accuracy; MCI vs. dementia: 80.3% accuracy) and predict MMSE scores with an $R2$ of 0.491 and severity of MTL atrophy with an $R2$ of 0.293. Our findings suggest that automated analysis of the drawing process can provide information about cognitive impairments and neuropathological changes due to dementia, which can help identify prodromal and clinical dementia as a digital biomarker.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于检测前驱和临床痴呆的绘图过程的自动分析
痴呆症的早期诊断,特别是在前驱阶段(即轻度认知障碍,或MCI),已成为研究和临床重点,但仍然具有挑战性。绘图过程的自动分析已被研究为一种有前途的筛查前驱和临床痴呆的手段,提供多方面的信息,包括特征,如绘图速度,笔的姿势,书写压力和停顿。我们研究了使用这些特征的可行性,不仅用于检测前驱和临床痴呆,还用于预测使用迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评估的认知障碍的严重程度,以及通过内侧颞叶(MTL)萎缩评估的神经病理改变的严重程度。我们用数字化平板和笔收集了145名认知正常(CN)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆老年人的绘画数据。嵌套交叉验证结果表明,结合绘图特征可用于CN、MCI和痴呆的分类,AUC为0.909,准确率为75.1% (CN vs MCI: 82.4%;CN与痴呆:准确率为92.2%;MCI与痴呆:准确率为80.3%),预测MMSE评分的R2为0.491,MTL萎缩严重程度的R2为0.293。我们的研究结果表明,绘制过程的自动化分析可以提供有关痴呆症引起的认知障碍和神经病理变化的信息,这有助于识别前驱和临床痴呆症作为数字生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing User-friendly Medical AI Applications - Methodical Development of User-centered Design Guidelines Digital Health Promotion For Fitness Enthusiasts In Africa Knowledge Management in a Healthcare Enterprise: Creation of a Digital Knowledge Repository A New Low-Cost and Accurate Diagnostic mHealth System for Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Detection of Erythropoietin in Blood to Uncover Doping in Sports using Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1