Dispelling Myths About a New Healthful Food Can Be More Motivating than Promoting Nutritional Benefits: The Case of Tofu

B. Wansink, Mitsuru Shimizu, A. Brumberg
{"title":"Dispelling Myths About a New Healthful Food Can Be More Motivating than Promoting Nutritional Benefits: The Case of Tofu","authors":"B. Wansink, Mitsuru Shimizu, A. Brumberg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2428850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study examines what factors impact the adoption of certain types of healthy foods, such as Tofu, by future nutritional gatekeepers. Design: Information on perceived facilitators and barriers to the utilization of barriers would be obtained via interviews and surveys. Setting: In-depth laddering interviews and an online survey during 2012 were utilized. Subjects: The in-depth laddering interviews were conducted with 83 young women and new mothers (non-vegetarians and non-Asians) who were enthusiastic lovers of tofu. 502 women from the target demographic (between 20 and 35, non-Asian) were recruited from a national panel and surveyed online in 2012. Results: Based on the interviews, 21 primary reasons for trying Tofu (facilitators) and 10 reasons that might be preventative (barriers) were identified. A key finding was that facilitators were not motivating factors for why women adopted tofu into their diets. Instead, barriers explained more than 44% of the variance for not adopting tofu. Conclusions: When encouraging nutritional gatekeepers to adopt Tofu in their home, it may be more effective to focus on changing the barriers. This study suggests that nutritionists and health practitioners may be more successful in encouraging the adoption of healthy new foods by dispelling their misconceptions rather than focusing on their nutritional benefits.","PeriodicalId":443127,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This study examines what factors impact the adoption of certain types of healthy foods, such as Tofu, by future nutritional gatekeepers. Design: Information on perceived facilitators and barriers to the utilization of barriers would be obtained via interviews and surveys. Setting: In-depth laddering interviews and an online survey during 2012 were utilized. Subjects: The in-depth laddering interviews were conducted with 83 young women and new mothers (non-vegetarians and non-Asians) who were enthusiastic lovers of tofu. 502 women from the target demographic (between 20 and 35, non-Asian) were recruited from a national panel and surveyed online in 2012. Results: Based on the interviews, 21 primary reasons for trying Tofu (facilitators) and 10 reasons that might be preventative (barriers) were identified. A key finding was that facilitators were not motivating factors for why women adopted tofu into their diets. Instead, barriers explained more than 44% of the variance for not adopting tofu. Conclusions: When encouraging nutritional gatekeepers to adopt Tofu in their home, it may be more effective to focus on changing the barriers. This study suggests that nutritionists and health practitioners may be more successful in encouraging the adoption of healthy new foods by dispelling their misconceptions rather than focusing on their nutritional benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消除关于一种新的健康食品的神话可能比宣传营养价值更有动力:豆腐的例子
目的:本研究探讨了哪些因素影响某些类型的健康食品的采用,如豆腐,由未来的营养看门人。设计:将通过访谈和调查获得关于感知到的促进因素和障碍利用的信息。设定:采用2012年的深度阶梯访谈和网络调查。研究对象:对83名热爱豆腐的年轻女性和新妈妈(非素食者和非亚洲人)进行了深入的阶梯访谈。2012年,研究人员从一个全国小组中招募了502名目标人群(年龄在20至35岁之间,非亚洲人),并对她们进行了在线调查。结果:在访谈的基础上,确定了21个尝试豆腐的主要原因(促进因素)和10个可能是预防性的原因(障碍)。一个重要的发现是,促进因素并不是女性将豆腐纳入饮食的激励因素。相反,障碍解释了不吃豆腐的44%以上的差异。结论:在鼓励营养看门人在家中采用豆腐时,关注改变障碍可能更有效。这项研究表明,营养学家和健康从业人员可能更成功地鼓励采用健康的新食品,消除他们的误解,而不是关注他们的营养价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived Job Risk and Dark CRM: Heightened Role of Perceived Job Insecurity & Fear of COVID-19 Two-stage Budgeting with Bounded Rationality How Consumers' Personality Traits Affect Their Buying Intensity in Sale Promotion Activities: The Mediatory Role of Buying Behavior Contracts in the Age of Smart Readers The Effect of Satisfaction, and Brand Image on Consumer Purchase: The Role of National Culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1