Thrombolytic therapy in the management of acute myocardial infarction.

J W Kennedy
{"title":"Thrombolytic therapy in the management of acute myocardial infarction.","authors":"J W Kennedy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is now clear that intravenous thrombolytic therapy is the treatment of choice in selected patients with AMI. It is most effective in patients with their first MIs and of greatest benefit, at least in the short term, for those with large infarctions. It should be given within the first three hours to be most effective and there probably is little benefit for patients after 5-6 hours unless there is evidence of ongoing ischemia. Patients must be selected carefully to reduce the likelihood of serious complications, including intracerebral hemorrhage. There is, as yet, no convincing evidence that early intervention with PTCA or surgery can improve the outcome of patients who have received initial early intravenous thrombolytic therapy when they develop recurrent myocardial ischemia (21,22). The use of rt-PA probably is preferable to the use of streptokinase, but further experience is needed before this can be determined with certainty. The large difference in the cost of these agents will need to be evaluated by the medical community and other health care providers who finally will determine the pattern of use of these and future thrombolytic agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":76754,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors of America","volume":"73 ","pages":"26-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Association of Life Insurance Medical Directors of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is now clear that intravenous thrombolytic therapy is the treatment of choice in selected patients with AMI. It is most effective in patients with their first MIs and of greatest benefit, at least in the short term, for those with large infarctions. It should be given within the first three hours to be most effective and there probably is little benefit for patients after 5-6 hours unless there is evidence of ongoing ischemia. Patients must be selected carefully to reduce the likelihood of serious complications, including intracerebral hemorrhage. There is, as yet, no convincing evidence that early intervention with PTCA or surgery can improve the outcome of patients who have received initial early intravenous thrombolytic therapy when they develop recurrent myocardial ischemia (21,22). The use of rt-PA probably is preferable to the use of streptokinase, but further experience is needed before this can be determined with certainty. The large difference in the cost of these agents will need to be evaluated by the medical community and other health care providers who finally will determine the pattern of use of these and future thrombolytic agents.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
溶栓治疗在急性心肌梗死中的应用。
现在很清楚,静脉溶栓治疗是AMI患者的治疗选择。它对首次心肌梗死患者最有效,对大面积梗死患者至少在短期内获益最大。应在前三小时内给予最有效,除非有持续缺血的证据,否则患者在5-6小时后可能没有什么益处。必须仔细选择患者,以减少严重并发症的可能性,包括脑出血。到目前为止,还没有令人信服的证据表明PTCA早期干预或手术可以改善复发性心肌缺血时接受早期静脉溶栓治疗的患者的预后(21,22)。使用rt-PA可能比使用链激酶更可取,但在确定之前需要进一步的经验。这些药物在成本上的巨大差异需要由医学界和其他卫生保健提供者进行评估,他们最终将决定这些药物和未来溶栓药物的使用模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medical Management of the Surgical Patient: Peptic ulcer disease Coronary artery disease. Rehabilitation and insurance relationships. Health access America: the growing ferment. The status and treatment of rheumatic disease and its impact on mortality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1