Modeling Permeability in Different Carbonate Rock Types

M. Dernaika, S. Masalmeh, Bashar Mansour, Osama Al Jallad, S. Koronfol
{"title":"Modeling Permeability in Different Carbonate Rock Types","authors":"M. Dernaika, S. Masalmeh, Bashar Mansour, Osama Al Jallad, S. Koronfol","doi":"10.30632/pjv64n1-2023a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In carbonate reservoirs, permeability prediction is often difficult due to the influence of various geological variables that control fluid flow. Many attempts have been made to estimate permeability from porosity by using theoretical and empirical equations. The suggested permeability models have been questionable in carbonates due to inherent heterogeneity and complex pore systems. The main objective of this paper is to provide a workflow to improve the use of existing models (e.g., Kozeny, Lucia, and Winland) to predict permeability in carbonate reservoirs. More than 1,000 core plugs were studied from seven different carbonate reservoirs across the Middle East: mainly Cretaceous reservoirs. The plugs were carefully selected to represent a wide range of properties within the cored intervals. The data set available included laboratory-measured helium porosity, gas permeability, thin-section photomicrographs, and high-pressure mercury injection. Rock textures were analyzed in the thin-section photomicrographs and were classified based on their content as grainy, muddy, and mixed. Special attention was given to the diagenesis effects, mainly compaction, cementation, and dissolution. The texture information was plotted in the porosity-permeability domain and was found to produce three distinct porosity-permeability relationships. Each texture gave a unique porosity-permeability trend, where the extent of the trend was controlled by diagenesis. Rock types were defined on each trend by detailed texture analysis and capillary pressure. Three different permeability equations (Kozeny, Winland, and Lucia) were evaluated to study their effectiveness in complex carbonate reservoirs. Both Kozeny and Lucia models honored the geology of the samples and showed similar trends to the porosity-permeability relationships, whereas the Winland model gave different slopes to the experimental data. The prediction of the permeability was improved by using different model parameters per RRT within each texture. This work presents a systematic approach to construct correlations between porosity and permeability in complex carbonate reservoirs. Model parameters (i.e., FZI, RFN, and r35) were suggested within different geological rock types to estimate permeability. Based on the workflow presented in the paper, the predicted permeability was improved to less than a factor of 2 compared to the measured values. Moreover, the same workflow was applied using the data from seven different reservoirs, and the same rock typing scheme was applicable to all the reservoirs. Such work is not abundant in the literature and would serve to improve permeability prediction in heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs, which is one of the main uncertainties in modeling carbonates.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv64n1-2023a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In carbonate reservoirs, permeability prediction is often difficult due to the influence of various geological variables that control fluid flow. Many attempts have been made to estimate permeability from porosity by using theoretical and empirical equations. The suggested permeability models have been questionable in carbonates due to inherent heterogeneity and complex pore systems. The main objective of this paper is to provide a workflow to improve the use of existing models (e.g., Kozeny, Lucia, and Winland) to predict permeability in carbonate reservoirs. More than 1,000 core plugs were studied from seven different carbonate reservoirs across the Middle East: mainly Cretaceous reservoirs. The plugs were carefully selected to represent a wide range of properties within the cored intervals. The data set available included laboratory-measured helium porosity, gas permeability, thin-section photomicrographs, and high-pressure mercury injection. Rock textures were analyzed in the thin-section photomicrographs and were classified based on their content as grainy, muddy, and mixed. Special attention was given to the diagenesis effects, mainly compaction, cementation, and dissolution. The texture information was plotted in the porosity-permeability domain and was found to produce three distinct porosity-permeability relationships. Each texture gave a unique porosity-permeability trend, where the extent of the trend was controlled by diagenesis. Rock types were defined on each trend by detailed texture analysis and capillary pressure. Three different permeability equations (Kozeny, Winland, and Lucia) were evaluated to study their effectiveness in complex carbonate reservoirs. Both Kozeny and Lucia models honored the geology of the samples and showed similar trends to the porosity-permeability relationships, whereas the Winland model gave different slopes to the experimental data. The prediction of the permeability was improved by using different model parameters per RRT within each texture. This work presents a systematic approach to construct correlations between porosity and permeability in complex carbonate reservoirs. Model parameters (i.e., FZI, RFN, and r35) were suggested within different geological rock types to estimate permeability. Based on the workflow presented in the paper, the predicted permeability was improved to less than a factor of 2 compared to the measured values. Moreover, the same workflow was applied using the data from seven different reservoirs, and the same rock typing scheme was applicable to all the reservoirs. Such work is not abundant in the literature and would serve to improve permeability prediction in heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs, which is one of the main uncertainties in modeling carbonates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同类型碳酸盐岩渗透率模拟
在碳酸盐岩储层中,由于控制流体流动的各种地质变量的影响,渗透率预测往往很困难。利用理论和经验方程从孔隙度估算渗透率已经做了许多尝试。由于碳酸盐固有的非均质性和复杂的孔隙系统,所提出的渗透率模型一直受到质疑。本文的主要目的是提供一个工作流程,以改进现有模型(例如Kozeny、Lucia和Winland)在预测碳酸盐岩储层渗透率方面的应用。研究人员对中东地区7个不同的碳酸盐岩储层(主要是白垩纪储层)的1000多个岩心桥塞进行了研究。桥塞经过精心挑选,以代表取心层段内的广泛属性。可用的数据集包括实验室测量的氦孔隙度、气体渗透率、薄层显微照片和高压压汞。在薄片显微照片上分析了岩石的结构,并根据其含量将其分为颗粒状、浑浊和混合。特别注意了成岩作用,主要是压实作用、胶结作用和溶蚀作用。将纹理信息绘制在孔隙度-渗透率域中,发现具有三种不同的孔隙度-渗透率关系。每种结构具有独特的孔渗趋势,其程度受成岩作用的控制。通过详细的结构分析和毛细压力,确定了各走向的岩石类型。评估了三种不同的渗透率方程(Kozeny、Winland和Lucia),以研究它们在复杂碳酸盐岩储层中的有效性。Kozeny和Lucia模型都尊重了样品的地质性质,并显示出相似的孔隙度-渗透率关系趋势,而Winland模型给出了不同的实验数据斜率。在每个纹理中使用不同的RRT模型参数,提高了渗透率的预测效果。本文提出了一种建立复杂碳酸盐岩储层孔隙度和渗透率相关性的系统方法。在不同的地质岩石类型中建议模型参数(即FZI, RFN和r35)来估计渗透率。基于本文提出的工作流程,预测渗透率与实测值相比提高到小于2倍。此外,对7个不同储层的数据采用了相同的工作流程,相同的岩石分类方案适用于所有储层。此类工作在文献中并不多见,将有助于提高非均质碳酸盐岩储层渗透率的预测,这是碳酸盐岩建模的主要不确定性之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Geological Facies Analysis in Crust-Mantle Transition Zone Petrophysical Analyses for Supporting the Search for a Claystone-Hosted Nuclear Repository A New R35 and Fractal Joint Rock Typing Method Using MICP Analysis: A Case Study in Middle East Iraq Nuclear Logging in Geological Probing for a Low-Carbon Energy Future – A New Frontier? Underground Hydrogen Storage in Porous Media: The Potential Role of Petrophysics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1