Legal Discourse on Customary Forest Determination Progressive Law Based

C. Perbawati, Malicia Evendia, A. Firmansyah, Yulia Neta
{"title":"Legal Discourse on Customary Forest Determination Progressive Law Based","authors":"C. Perbawati, Malicia Evendia, A. Firmansyah, Yulia Neta","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no1.2815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Customary forests are an integral part of the life of indigenous and tribal peoples. MK Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012 is a progressive step stipulating that customary forests are no longer part of State forests. However, after the decision, there is still a long process that the Indigenous Peoples must pass to obtain their rights. This article aims to describe the legal discourse in determining the customary forest. Using doctrinal research methods as well as statutory and conceptual approaches, it was found that: The designation of customary forests is an important matter in the context of implementing the constitutional rights of customary law communities that existed even before Indonesia was established as a sovereign country. The long and procedural process of establishing customary forests requires the support of the regional government through various progressive policies to create indigenous peoples who are sovereign over their customary forests. With the legal credo for humans, progressive law offers an approach that can become the basis for the realization of legal policies for establishing customary forests in the regions.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no1.2815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Customary forests are an integral part of the life of indigenous and tribal peoples. MK Decision No. 35/PUU-X/2012 is a progressive step stipulating that customary forests are no longer part of State forests. However, after the decision, there is still a long process that the Indigenous Peoples must pass to obtain their rights. This article aims to describe the legal discourse in determining the customary forest. Using doctrinal research methods as well as statutory and conceptual approaches, it was found that: The designation of customary forests is an important matter in the context of implementing the constitutional rights of customary law communities that existed even before Indonesia was established as a sovereign country. The long and procedural process of establishing customary forests requires the support of the regional government through various progressive policies to create indigenous peoples who are sovereign over their customary forests. With the legal credo for humans, progressive law offers an approach that can become the basis for the realization of legal policies for establishing customary forests in the regions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于进步法的习惯林确定的法律论述
习惯森林是土著和部落人民生活的组成部分。MK第35/PUU-X/2012号决定是一个渐进的步骤,规定习惯森林不再是国家森林的一部分。然而,在作出决定之后,土著人民仍必须经过一个漫长的过程才能获得其权利。本文旨在描述确定习惯森林的法律话语。使用理论研究方法以及法定和概念方法,发现:在执行甚至在印度尼西亚成为一个主权国家之前就存在的习惯法社区的宪法权利方面,指定习惯森林是一个重要问题。建立习惯森林的漫长和程序性过程需要区域政府通过各种进步政策提供支持,以建立对其习惯森林拥有主权的土著人民。有了为人类的法律信条,进步的法律提供了一种方法,可以成为实现在各区域建立习惯森林的法律政策的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compulsory Licensing in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): Current Application and Future Prospects in Indonesia The Effectiveness of Legal Aid Standards for Suspects in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System in Achieving Access to Justice The Establishment of Village Regulations in the Context of Village Democratization Additional Legal Protection for Corruption Whistleblowers Appointing Constitutional Court Justices with Statesman Qualification through Transparent Selection Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1