Introduction and optimization of the in-vitro method for determining the hemocompatibility of modified poly(ethylene)terephthalate surfaces

J. Stana, D. Stropnik, S. Strnad, Tea Indest, M. Jevšek, G. Košir
{"title":"Introduction and optimization of the in-vitro method for determining the hemocompatibility of modified poly(ethylene)terephthalate surfaces","authors":"J. Stana, D. Stropnik, S. Strnad, Tea Indest, M. Jevšek, G. Košir","doi":"10.18690/actabiomed.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Internationally-accepted standards have been developed for a range of tests and parameters for characterising the in-vitro interactions of biomaterials with blood. However, there are, as yet, no standards concerning the size, design and type of such in-vitro testing systems (1). Since the development of hemocompatible biomaterials provides a very important challenge in material science, there is a need for further progress in finding reliable and standardized methods for hemocompatibility testing (2). The aim of this research was to introduce a method for analyzing the hemocompatibility of different chemically-modified surfaces. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), with surface modifications using differentpolysaccharides and their derivatives, were chosen because of their promising biocompatible properties and numerous potential biomedical applications.Methods: A modified hemoglobin-free method was used to determine the antithrombogenicity of the modified PET surfaces (4). The method was optimized for shaking rate, the addition of buffer, and blood temperature to decrease measuring errors. Five differently-modified PET surfaces were analyzed: chemically pre-treated PET and PET treated with chitosan, fucoidan, sulphated chitosan and heparin. Glass was used as a standard thrombogenic surface.Results: The results showed that a lower shaking rate, the addition of buffer, and blood cooling prior to measurement significantly decreased the standard deviation of the measurement results by a total of about 89 %.Conclusions: We believe this optimized hemoglobinfree method is suitable for distinguishing between chemically and structurally-different surfaces, such as glass and PET. The differences between PET surfaces coated with different polysaccharides were, however, less pronounced.","PeriodicalId":186880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Internationally-accepted standards have been developed for a range of tests and parameters for characterising the in-vitro interactions of biomaterials with blood. However, there are, as yet, no standards concerning the size, design and type of such in-vitro testing systems (1). Since the development of hemocompatible biomaterials provides a very important challenge in material science, there is a need for further progress in finding reliable and standardized methods for hemocompatibility testing (2). The aim of this research was to introduce a method for analyzing the hemocompatibility of different chemically-modified surfaces. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), with surface modifications using differentpolysaccharides and their derivatives, were chosen because of their promising biocompatible properties and numerous potential biomedical applications.Methods: A modified hemoglobin-free method was used to determine the antithrombogenicity of the modified PET surfaces (4). The method was optimized for shaking rate, the addition of buffer, and blood temperature to decrease measuring errors. Five differently-modified PET surfaces were analyzed: chemically pre-treated PET and PET treated with chitosan, fucoidan, sulphated chitosan and heparin. Glass was used as a standard thrombogenic surface.Results: The results showed that a lower shaking rate, the addition of buffer, and blood cooling prior to measurement significantly decreased the standard deviation of the measurement results by a total of about 89 %.Conclusions: We believe this optimized hemoglobinfree method is suitable for distinguishing between chemically and structurally-different surfaces, such as glass and PET. The differences between PET surfaces coated with different polysaccharides were, however, less pronounced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改性聚对苯二甲酸乙酯表面血液相容性体外测定方法的介绍与优化
目的:为生物材料与血液的体外相互作用特征的一系列测试和参数制定了国际公认的标准。然而,到目前为止,还没有关于这种体外测试系统的尺寸、设计和类型的标准(1)。由于血液相容性生物材料的发展为材料科学提供了一个非常重要的挑战,因此需要在寻找可靠和标准化的血液相容性测试方法方面取得进一步进展(2)。本研究的目的是介绍一种分析不同化学修饰表面血液相容性的方法。选择使用不同多糖及其衍生物进行表面修饰的聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)是因为其具有良好的生物相容性和许多潜在的生物医学应用。方法:采用改进的无血红蛋白法测定改性PET表面的抗血栓性(4)。该方法对摇频、添加缓冲液和血温进行了优化,以减少测量误差。分析了五种不同改性的PET表面:化学预处理的PET和壳聚糖、岩藻聚糖、硫酸壳聚糖和肝素处理的PET。玻璃被用作标准的致血栓表面。结果:实验结果表明,降低摇频、加入缓冲液和测定前血液冷却可显著降低测定结果的标准差,共降低约89%。结论:我们认为这种优化的无血红蛋白方法适用于区分化学和结构不同的表面,如玻璃和PET。然而,包被不同多糖的PET表面之间的差异不太明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Razvoj znanstvenoraziskovalnega dela študentov MF UM v zadnji 20 letih / The development of the scientific research work of MF UM students in the last 20 years Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early-stage endometrial cancer: Effect on oncological outcomes Transient Neonatal Myasthenia Gravis: Case Report Polyneuritis cranialis related to SARS-CoV-2 infection: a case report Alpha Cell Stimulus-Secretion Coupling and Intercellular Interactions in Health and Type 2 Diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1