Blood pressure response to dynamic resistance exercise with different times under blood flow restriction on normotensive subjects: a randomized crossover trial
L. L. Sousa, D. D. Nascimento, Nicholas Rolnick, J. Barbosa, Robson Conceição Silva, Bruno Viana Rosa, Thailson Fernandes da Silva, Carlos Ernesto Santos Ferreira
{"title":"Blood pressure response to dynamic resistance exercise with different times under blood flow restriction on normotensive subjects: a randomized crossover trial","authors":"L. L. Sousa, D. D. Nascimento, Nicholas Rolnick, J. Barbosa, Robson Conceição Silva, Bruno Viana Rosa, Thailson Fernandes da Silva, Carlos Ernesto Santos Ferreira","doi":"10.33233/rbfex.v21i4.5247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recommendations for time under blood flow restriction (BFR) during resistance training (RT) vary between 5 to 10 minutes, and beneficial effects on muscle mass and strength have already been reported. However, there exists the potential for longer times under restriction to produce greater acute activation of the exercise pressor reflex and subsequent sympathetic pathways leading to a greater hemodynamic response. Objective: To verify blood pressure responses to dynamic resistance exercise with different times (5 vs. 10 minutes) under blood flow restriction in normotensive subjects. Methods: In a randomized crossover trial design, twelve healthy and physically active male participants completed a training with BFR under the following protocols: control, BFR-5 minutes, BFR-10 minutes. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements were taken by an experienced researcher immediately after each exercise set. Results: Both BFR-5 minutes and BFR-10 minutes induced acute elevations in SBP, DBP and heart rate (HR) as the sets progressed, without statistical differences between them. However, BFR-10 displayed a superior effect size for SBP and DBP compared to BFR-5 minutes. Conclusion: Based on the present study results, the time under BFR during resistance exercise does not affect blood pressure response in normotensive subjects.","PeriodicalId":219038,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do exerc&iacute cio","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia do exerc&iacute cio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33233/rbfex.v21i4.5247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Recommendations for time under blood flow restriction (BFR) during resistance training (RT) vary between 5 to 10 minutes, and beneficial effects on muscle mass and strength have already been reported. However, there exists the potential for longer times under restriction to produce greater acute activation of the exercise pressor reflex and subsequent sympathetic pathways leading to a greater hemodynamic response. Objective: To verify blood pressure responses to dynamic resistance exercise with different times (5 vs. 10 minutes) under blood flow restriction in normotensive subjects. Methods: In a randomized crossover trial design, twelve healthy and physically active male participants completed a training with BFR under the following protocols: control, BFR-5 minutes, BFR-10 minutes. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements were taken by an experienced researcher immediately after each exercise set. Results: Both BFR-5 minutes and BFR-10 minutes induced acute elevations in SBP, DBP and heart rate (HR) as the sets progressed, without statistical differences between them. However, BFR-10 displayed a superior effect size for SBP and DBP compared to BFR-5 minutes. Conclusion: Based on the present study results, the time under BFR during resistance exercise does not affect blood pressure response in normotensive subjects.
在阻力训练(RT)中,推荐的血流量限制(BFR)时间在5到10分钟之间,对肌肉质量和力量的有益影响已经有报道。然而,在长时间的限制下存在产生更大的运动压力反射的急性激活和随后的交感神经通路导致更大的血流动力学反应的可能性。目的:验证血压正常受试者在血流受限条件下,不同时间(5 vs 10分钟)动态阻力运动的血压反应。方法:在随机交叉试验设计中,12名健康且身体活跃的男性受试者在以下方案下完成了BFR训练:对照组,BFR-5分钟,BFR-10分钟。收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)测量由一位经验丰富的研究人员在每次运动后立即进行。结果:BFR-5分钟和BFR-10分钟均随时间推移引起收缩压、舒张压和心率(HR)急性升高,两者间无统计学差异。然而,与BFR-5分钟相比,BFR-10分钟对收缩压和舒张压的影响更大。结论:基于目前的研究结果,在抗阻运动中进行BFR的时间对血压正常的受试者的血压反应没有影响。