On the Evaluation of Data Fusion for Information Retrieval

David Lillis
{"title":"On the Evaluation of Data Fusion for Information Retrieval","authors":"David Lillis","doi":"10.1145/3441501.3441506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data Fusion combines document rankings from multiple systems into one, in order to improve retrieval effectiveness. Many approaches to this task have been proposed in the literature, and these have been evaluated in various ways. This paper examines a number of such evaluations, to extract commonalities between approaches. Some drawbacks of the prevailing evaluation strategies are then identified, and suggestions made for more appropriate evaluation of data fusion.","PeriodicalId":415985,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3441501.3441506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Data Fusion combines document rankings from multiple systems into one, in order to improve retrieval effectiveness. Many approaches to this task have been proposed in the literature, and these have been evaluated in various ways. This paper examines a number of such evaluations, to extract commonalities between approaches. Some drawbacks of the prevailing evaluation strategies are then identified, and suggestions made for more appropriate evaluation of data fusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息检索数据融合评价研究
数据融合将来自多个系统的文档排名合并为一个,以提高检索效率。文献中提出了许多方法来完成这项任务,并以各种方式对这些方法进行了评估。本文考察了一些这样的评估,以提取方法之间的共性。然后确定了当前评估策略的一些缺点,并提出了更适当地评估数据融合的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bi-directional Encoder Representation of Transformer model for Sequential Music Recommender System Overview of the PAN@FIRE 2020 Task on the Authorship Identification of SOurce COde Overview of RCD-2020, the FIRE-2020 track on Retrieval from Conversational Dialogues Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation FIRE 2020 EDNIL Track: Event Detection from News in Indian Languages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1