Exploring social innovation (SI) within the research contexts of higher education, healthcare, and welfare services – a scoping review

A. M. L. Husebø, Marianne Storm, Atle Ødegård, Charlotte Wegener, M. Aakjær, Anne Lyngby Pedersen, Maja Boelsmand Østergaard, E. Willumsen
{"title":"Exploring social innovation (SI) within the research contexts of higher education, healthcare, and welfare services – a scoping review","authors":"A. M. L. Husebø, Marianne Storm, Atle Ødegård, Charlotte Wegener, M. Aakjær, Anne Lyngby Pedersen, Maja Boelsmand Østergaard, E. Willumsen","doi":"10.7577/NJSR.3455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Nordic countries face societal challenges for which social innovation may represent solutions. The aim of this scoping review is to explore the concept of social innovation within the research contexts of higher education, ealthcare, and welfare services.\nMethod: A scoping review methodology was used, including a literature search and the identification of eligible studies published between 2007 and 2019, in addition to data extraction and synthesis. Forty-three studies were included in this review.\nResults: Across the research contexts, social innovation is conceptualized as a set of novel, creative, human-centred, and value-driven processes aiming to bring about change. Qualitative research methods dominate social innovation research. In welfare services, social innovation concerns the relationship between policy and praxis, new forms of leadership and management, and the promotion of societal inclusion and cohesion. Social innovation in healthcare comprises the use of technology to digitalize service, enhance patients’ well-being, and improve service quality. In higher education, social innovation research focuses on educational reforms involving non-profit stakeholders.\nDiscussion: Social innovation is a multifaceted concept related to change at the organizational or societal level, often with various stakeholders working together to create improvements. The lack of a common definition and framework of social innovation makes this concept difficult to measure or quantify, reflecting the dominance of qualitative research methods in the selected research contexts. Across these research contexts, social innovation can be defined and used for various research purposes, which are often political and value-based, with the latter connected to the common good and people’s well-being. Moreover, few social innovation studies have been performed in Nordic countries.","PeriodicalId":207067,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/NJSR.3455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: Nordic countries face societal challenges for which social innovation may represent solutions. The aim of this scoping review is to explore the concept of social innovation within the research contexts of higher education, ealthcare, and welfare services. Method: A scoping review methodology was used, including a literature search and the identification of eligible studies published between 2007 and 2019, in addition to data extraction and synthesis. Forty-three studies were included in this review. Results: Across the research contexts, social innovation is conceptualized as a set of novel, creative, human-centred, and value-driven processes aiming to bring about change. Qualitative research methods dominate social innovation research. In welfare services, social innovation concerns the relationship between policy and praxis, new forms of leadership and management, and the promotion of societal inclusion and cohesion. Social innovation in healthcare comprises the use of technology to digitalize service, enhance patients’ well-being, and improve service quality. In higher education, social innovation research focuses on educational reforms involving non-profit stakeholders. Discussion: Social innovation is a multifaceted concept related to change at the organizational or societal level, often with various stakeholders working together to create improvements. The lack of a common definition and framework of social innovation makes this concept difficult to measure or quantify, reflecting the dominance of qualitative research methods in the selected research contexts. Across these research contexts, social innovation can be defined and used for various research purposes, which are often political and value-based, with the latter connected to the common good and people’s well-being. Moreover, few social innovation studies have been performed in Nordic countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在高等教育、医疗保健和福利服务的研究背景下探索社会创新(SI)——范围审查
引言:北欧国家面临社会挑战,社会创新可能代表解决方案。本文的目的是在高等教育、医疗保健和福利服务的研究背景下探讨社会创新的概念。方法:采用范围审查方法,包括文献检索和确定2007年至2019年发表的符合条件的研究,以及数据提取和综合。本综述纳入了43项研究。结果:在整个研究背景下,社会创新被定义为一系列旨在带来变革的新颖、创造性、以人为本和价值驱动的过程。定性研究方法主导着社会创新研究。在福利服务方面,社会创新涉及政策与实践之间的关系,新形式的领导和管理,以及促进社会包容和凝聚力。医疗保健领域的社会创新包括利用技术实现服务数字化、增强患者福祉和提高服务质量。在高等教育领域,社会创新研究的重点是涉及非营利性利益相关者的教育改革。讨论:社会创新是一个多方面的概念,与组织或社会层面的变化有关,通常由不同的利益相关者共同努力创造改进。缺乏社会创新的共同定义和框架使得这一概念难以衡量或量化,反映了在选定的研究背景下定性研究方法的主导地位。在这些研究背景下,社会创新可以被定义并用于各种研究目的,这些研究目的通常是政治和基于价值的,后者与共同利益和人民福祉有关。此外,北欧国家很少进行社会创新研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disembodied care: Articulations of care in municipal policy regarding welfare technologies in eldercare Disembodied care: Articulations of care in municipal policy regarding welfare technologies in eldercare Economic composition and income volatility of Norwegian low-income families – a mixed method study of its implications How children’s navigation on digital platforms challenges child welfare assessments The complexity of multiple trauma understandings across disciplines – the COVID-19 pandemic as a ‘case’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1