Anti-tumor effect of cisplatin, carboplatin, mitoxantrone, and doxorubicin on peritoneal tumor growth after intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy: a comparative study.

G Los, J D Nagel, J G McVie
{"title":"Anti-tumor effect of cisplatin, carboplatin, mitoxantrone, and doxorubicin on peritoneal tumor growth after intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy: a comparative study.","authors":"G Los,&nbsp;J D Nagel,&nbsp;J G McVie","doi":"10.1089/sct.1990.6.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumor growth was studied in a peritoneal tumor model in the rat after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of doxorubicin (4 mg/kg), mitoxantrone (2.5 mg/kg) and cisplatin (4 mg/kg) and after intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin (20 mg/kg). All treatments delayed tumor growth and intraperitoneal treatment was more effective initially than intravenous treatment for all drugs tested. Regrowth occurred between 2 and 7 weeks after treatment and was less pronounced after intravenous treatment. Tumor sizes in cisplatin treated rats 7 weeks after treatment were comparable after intraperitoneal and intravenous treatments. Intraperitoneal carboplatin even with a dose 5 times higher than cisplatin resulted in a less tumor growth delay in all stages of the treatment, compared to cisplatin. All cytostatic drugs, except carboplatin, induced loss of body weight. Weight loss was similar for intraperitoneal and intravenous treatment with both cisplatin and mitoxantrone while for doxorubicin the weight loss was significantly higher after intravenous treatment than after intraperitoneal therapy. Considering the \"therapeutic index\", defined as the ratio of tumor growth delay to weight loss, cisplatin had the highest \"therapeutic index\", 1.5 (intraperitoneal) and 1.7 (intravenous) compared to 0.3 (intraperitoneal) and 0.6 (intravenous) for Mitoxantrone and 0.4 (intraperitoneal) and 0.5 (intravenous) for doxorubicin. This indicated that cisplatin was the most favorable drug to use in this peritoneal tumor model for both intraperitoneal and intravenous treatment. The tumor growth delay was initially more pronounced after intraperitoneal cisplatin compared with intravenous.</p>","PeriodicalId":21792,"journal":{"name":"Selective cancer therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/sct.1990.6.73","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selective cancer therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sct.1990.6.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Tumor growth was studied in a peritoneal tumor model in the rat after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of doxorubicin (4 mg/kg), mitoxantrone (2.5 mg/kg) and cisplatin (4 mg/kg) and after intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin (20 mg/kg). All treatments delayed tumor growth and intraperitoneal treatment was more effective initially than intravenous treatment for all drugs tested. Regrowth occurred between 2 and 7 weeks after treatment and was less pronounced after intravenous treatment. Tumor sizes in cisplatin treated rats 7 weeks after treatment were comparable after intraperitoneal and intravenous treatments. Intraperitoneal carboplatin even with a dose 5 times higher than cisplatin resulted in a less tumor growth delay in all stages of the treatment, compared to cisplatin. All cytostatic drugs, except carboplatin, induced loss of body weight. Weight loss was similar for intraperitoneal and intravenous treatment with both cisplatin and mitoxantrone while for doxorubicin the weight loss was significantly higher after intravenous treatment than after intraperitoneal therapy. Considering the "therapeutic index", defined as the ratio of tumor growth delay to weight loss, cisplatin had the highest "therapeutic index", 1.5 (intraperitoneal) and 1.7 (intravenous) compared to 0.3 (intraperitoneal) and 0.6 (intravenous) for Mitoxantrone and 0.4 (intraperitoneal) and 0.5 (intravenous) for doxorubicin. This indicated that cisplatin was the most favorable drug to use in this peritoneal tumor model for both intraperitoneal and intravenous treatment. The tumor growth delay was initially more pronounced after intraperitoneal cisplatin compared with intravenous.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺铂、卡铂、米托蒽醌和阿霉素对腹腔和静脉化疗后腹膜肿瘤生长的抑制作用比较研究。
腹腔注射阿霉素(4 mg/kg)、米托蒽醌(2.5 mg/kg)、顺铂(4 mg/kg)和卡铂(20 mg/kg)后,在大鼠腹膜肿瘤模型中观察肿瘤生长情况。所有的治疗都延迟了肿瘤的生长,在所有的药物测试中,腹腔内治疗比静脉内治疗更有效。再生发生在治疗后2 - 7周,静脉注射治疗后较不明显。顺铂治疗后7周大鼠的肿瘤大小在腹腔和静脉注射治疗后相当。与顺铂相比,腹腔卡铂即使剂量比顺铂高5倍,在治疗的所有阶段肿瘤生长延迟都更少。除卡铂外,所有细胞抑制药物均可引起体重减轻。顺铂和米托蒽醌腹腔和静脉治疗的体重减轻相似,而阿霉素静脉治疗后的体重减轻明显高于腹腔治疗。考虑“治疗指数”,即肿瘤生长延迟与体重减轻的比值,顺铂的“治疗指数”最高,为1.5(腹腔)和1.7(静脉),米托醌为0.3(腹腔)和0.6(静脉),阿霉素为0.4(腹腔)和0.5(静脉)。这表明顺铂是腹膜肿瘤模型中腹腔和静脉注射治疗最有利的药物。与静脉注射顺铂相比,腹腔注射顺铂后肿瘤生长延迟更明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expression of the multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein and in vitro chemosensitivity: correlation with in vivo response to chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. A pilot clinical and pharmacokinetic study of intracarotid cisplatin and bleomycin. Detection of P-glycoprotein with JSB-1 monoclonal antibody in B-5 fixed and paraffin-embedded cell lines and tissues. Microscopic analysis of arterial microsphere distribution in rabbit liver and hepatic VX2 tumor. Synthetic polymers conjugated to monoclonal antibodies: vehicles for tumour-targeted drug delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1