Effects of Aquatic Resistance Plyometric Training on Lower Limb Strength, Jumping Performance and Dynamic Stability in Collegiate Basketball Players

Yu-Chun Chung
{"title":"Effects of Aquatic Resistance Plyometric Training on Lower Limb Strength, Jumping Performance and Dynamic Stability in Collegiate Basketball Players","authors":"Yu-Chun Chung","doi":"10.5297/SER.1802.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 8 weeks aquatic resistance plyometric training (ARPT) on lower limb strength, jumping performance, dynamic stability and muscle soreness, and also to determine the persistence of training effect following 4 weeks detraining in collegiate basketball players. Fifteen Division I male basketball players from Chinese Culture University (CCU) (age: 19.8 ± 0.9 yr, height: 186.1 ± 5.7 cm, weight: 82.9 ± 5.7 kg) were randomly assigned into ARPT and C (control) groups. After the pretests, participants in both training groups performed two 60-min training sessions per week for 8 weeks. Posttest analyses were conducted after first and fourth week of detraining. Results indicated that 4 weeks detraining significantly improved the relative peak torque of knee extension with angular velocity set at 60°.S^(-1) and 180°.S^(-1), and jump height of three-step jump (TSJ) compared to pre-test in ARPT group. Furthermore, relative peak torque with angular velocity set at 180°.S^(-1) and contact time of TSJ were also significantly improved following 4-week detraining than 1 week after training. The Star Excursion Balance Test of ARPT group was significantly improved than pre-test following 1 and 4 weeks of detraining. We conclude that the aquatic resistance plyometric training significantly improved the dynamic stability of the lower limbs, and these effects appear to be sustained until 4 weeks following detraining. Although the effect of ARPT has a delay phenomenon in lower limb strength and jumping performance after 8-week training, however, following 4-week detraining, the effects are significantly better than pre-test and 1 week after training. We recommend that aquatic resistance plyometric training could be applied with tapering, which may be beneficial to maintain the s pecific physical fitness in the longer season.","PeriodicalId":338279,"journal":{"name":"Sports & Exercise Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports & Exercise Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5297/SER.1802.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 8 weeks aquatic resistance plyometric training (ARPT) on lower limb strength, jumping performance, dynamic stability and muscle soreness, and also to determine the persistence of training effect following 4 weeks detraining in collegiate basketball players. Fifteen Division I male basketball players from Chinese Culture University (CCU) (age: 19.8 ± 0.9 yr, height: 186.1 ± 5.7 cm, weight: 82.9 ± 5.7 kg) were randomly assigned into ARPT and C (control) groups. After the pretests, participants in both training groups performed two 60-min training sessions per week for 8 weeks. Posttest analyses were conducted after first and fourth week of detraining. Results indicated that 4 weeks detraining significantly improved the relative peak torque of knee extension with angular velocity set at 60°.S^(-1) and 180°.S^(-1), and jump height of three-step jump (TSJ) compared to pre-test in ARPT group. Furthermore, relative peak torque with angular velocity set at 180°.S^(-1) and contact time of TSJ were also significantly improved following 4-week detraining than 1 week after training. The Star Excursion Balance Test of ARPT group was significantly improved than pre-test following 1 and 4 weeks of detraining. We conclude that the aquatic resistance plyometric training significantly improved the dynamic stability of the lower limbs, and these effects appear to be sustained until 4 weeks following detraining. Although the effect of ARPT has a delay phenomenon in lower limb strength and jumping performance after 8-week training, however, following 4-week detraining, the effects are significantly better than pre-test and 1 week after training. We recommend that aquatic resistance plyometric training could be applied with tapering, which may be beneficial to maintain the s pecific physical fitness in the longer season.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水上阻力增强训练对大学生篮球运动员下肢力量、跳跃能力和动态稳定性的影响
摘要本研究旨在探讨8周水上阻力增强训练(ARPT)对大学生篮球运动员下肢力量、跳跃能力、运动稳定性和肌肉酸痛的影响,并探讨4周后训练效果的持续性。选取年龄19.8±0.9岁,身高186.1±5.7 cm,体重82.9±5.7 kg的中国文化大学一级篮球运动员15名,随机分为ARPT组和C组(对照组)。在预测试之后,两个训练组的参与者每周进行两次60分钟的训练,持续8周。在去训练第一周和第四周后进行后测分析。结果表明,与ARPT前组相比,4周去训练显著提高了膝关节伸展角速度为60°s ^(-1)和180°s ^(-1)的相对峰值扭矩,以及三步跳(TSJ)的跳高。此外,与训练后1周相比,去训练后4周的相对峰值扭矩(角速度为180°s ^(-1))和TSJ接触时间也有显著提高。在去训练1周和4周后,ARPT组的星偏移平衡测试明显改善。我们得出结论,水中阻力增强训练显著改善了下肢的动态稳定性,这些效果似乎持续到去训练后4周。虽然ARPT在8周训练后对下肢力量和跳跃表现的影响存在延迟现象,但在去训练4周后,效果明显优于前测和训练后1周。我们建议水上阻力增强训练可以采用锥形训练,这可能有利于在更长的季节中保持特定的身体健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sources of Social Pressure and Its Influences on Athletes in Competitive Situations Comparison of Different Cutting Modes on Knee Joint Loading of Non-Pivot Leg in Female Basketball Players Application of PETTLEP Imagery and Motivational Imagery Type: A Case Study on Senior High School Archers Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Fat Loss and Metabolic Markers in Middle-Aged Men Protein Supplementation Principle for Training: Quality is More Important than Quantity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1