Lactulose, but not Macrogol or Bisacodyl, Shows a Prebiotic Effect in a Computer-Controlled In Vitro Model of the Human Large Intestine

M. Bothe, A. Maathuis, S. Bellmann, Katja Lange, J. D. Vossen, A-C Neumann, A. Kuchinka-Koch, J. Stover
{"title":"Lactulose, but not Macrogol or Bisacodyl, Shows a Prebiotic Effect in a Computer-Controlled In Vitro Model of the Human Large Intestine","authors":"M. Bothe, A. Maathuis, S. Bellmann, Katja Lange, J. D. Vossen, A-C Neumann, A. Kuchinka-Koch, J. Stover","doi":"10.31038/mip.2021231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[12], PEG treatment increased the number of Verrucomicrobia and decreased that of Firmicutes. In mice, Macrogol 3350/PEG decreased the microbial density [13] and relative abundance [14], while Lactulose increased it [13]. Bisacodyl increased the gut microbiota metabolites namely SCFA in rats [15]. Furthermore, a slight increase in bifidobacteria was observed after three months of constipation treatment in humans [1]. Data on direct comparison of the prebiotic effects of the three laxatives Lactulose, Macrogol and Bisacodyl are sparse. In patients with constipation, the efficacy of Lactulose was similar to that of PEG in relieving constipation in a 4 week treatment [16]. The levels of bifidobacteria, but not lactobacilli, were significantly increased in the patients receiving Lactulose, but not in the patients receiving PEG [16]. In contrary, the total amount of bacteria was rather decreased and the colonic fermentation inhibited by treatment with PEG [16]. To our knowledge, no further studies directly comparing at least two of the three laxatives are available, hindering the comparison of Lactulose, Bisacodyl and Macrogol regarding their prebiotic effect. Abstract Background: Patients with chronic constipation often suffer from dysbiosis and may benefit from prebiotic effects of laxatives. Methods: Here we evaluate potential beneficial effects on the gut microbiome of the most commonly used laxatives Macrogol, Bisacodyl, and Lactulose in their usual daily dose for adults using the TIM-2 system, a computer-controlled model of the proximal large intestine with metabolically active, anaerobic microbiota of human origin. Results: Only Lactulose increased the short-chain fatty acid levels and decreased the branched-chain fatty acid levels, pH, and ammonia. Five days of incubation with Lactulose increased the bacterial counts of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus which was not observed with Macrogol or Bisacodyl. Conclusion: These data show that Lactulose, in contrast to Macrogol and Bisacodyl, exerts a prebiotic effect when compared in the same in vitro system. In our study, we investigated the prebiotic effect of Lactulose, Macrogol, and Bisacodyl in the TIM-2 model, an in vitro model of the proximal colon. The results of this study demonstrate that Lactulose contrary to Macrogol or Bisacodyl, increased the short-chain fatty acid production as well as the bifidobacterial and lactobacilli count, thereby showing a prebiotic effect.","PeriodicalId":414753,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology","volume":"205 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/mip.2021231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[12], PEG treatment increased the number of Verrucomicrobia and decreased that of Firmicutes. In mice, Macrogol 3350/PEG decreased the microbial density [13] and relative abundance [14], while Lactulose increased it [13]. Bisacodyl increased the gut microbiota metabolites namely SCFA in rats [15]. Furthermore, a slight increase in bifidobacteria was observed after three months of constipation treatment in humans [1]. Data on direct comparison of the prebiotic effects of the three laxatives Lactulose, Macrogol and Bisacodyl are sparse. In patients with constipation, the efficacy of Lactulose was similar to that of PEG in relieving constipation in a 4 week treatment [16]. The levels of bifidobacteria, but not lactobacilli, were significantly increased in the patients receiving Lactulose, but not in the patients receiving PEG [16]. In contrary, the total amount of bacteria was rather decreased and the colonic fermentation inhibited by treatment with PEG [16]. To our knowledge, no further studies directly comparing at least two of the three laxatives are available, hindering the comparison of Lactulose, Bisacodyl and Macrogol regarding their prebiotic effect. Abstract Background: Patients with chronic constipation often suffer from dysbiosis and may benefit from prebiotic effects of laxatives. Methods: Here we evaluate potential beneficial effects on the gut microbiome of the most commonly used laxatives Macrogol, Bisacodyl, and Lactulose in their usual daily dose for adults using the TIM-2 system, a computer-controlled model of the proximal large intestine with metabolically active, anaerobic microbiota of human origin. Results: Only Lactulose increased the short-chain fatty acid levels and decreased the branched-chain fatty acid levels, pH, and ammonia. Five days of incubation with Lactulose increased the bacterial counts of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus which was not observed with Macrogol or Bisacodyl. Conclusion: These data show that Lactulose, in contrast to Macrogol and Bisacodyl, exerts a prebiotic effect when compared in the same in vitro system. In our study, we investigated the prebiotic effect of Lactulose, Macrogol, and Bisacodyl in the TIM-2 model, an in vitro model of the proximal colon. The results of this study demonstrate that Lactulose contrary to Macrogol or Bisacodyl, increased the short-chain fatty acid production as well as the bifidobacterial and lactobacilli count, thereby showing a prebiotic effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳果糖在计算机控制的人类大肠体外模型中显示出益生元效应,而不是巨量醇或双羟基乙酸乙酯
[12], PEG处理增加了Verrucomicrobia的数量,减少了厚壁菌门的数量。在小鼠中,Macrogol 3350/PEG降低了微生物密度[13]和相对丰度[14],而乳果糖增加了微生物密度[13]。Bisacodyl增加了大鼠肠道微生物代谢物即SCFA[15]。此外,在人类便秘治疗三个月后,观察到双歧杆菌的轻微增加[1]。关于乳果糖、巨糖醇和比沙科代这三种泻药的益生元效应的直接比较数据很少。在便秘患者中,乳果糖与PEG治疗4周后缓解便秘的效果相似[16]。乳果糖组双歧杆菌水平明显升高,而乳酸菌水平无明显升高,PEG组无明显升高[16]。相反,经PEG处理后,细菌总数反而减少,结肠发酵受到抑制[16]。据我们所知,没有进一步的研究可以直接比较三种泻药中的至少两种,这阻碍了乳果糖、比沙酰和巨糖醇在益生元作用方面的比较。背景:慢性便秘患者往往患有生态失调,可能受益于泻药的益生元作用。方法:在这里,我们使用TIM-2系统(一种具有人类来源的代谢活跃的厌氧微生物群的近端大肠计算机控制模型)评估了最常用的泻药大糖醇、比索酰和乳果糖在其通常日剂量下对肠道微生物群的潜在有益影响。结果:只有乳果糖增加了短链脂肪酸水平,降低了支链脂肪酸水平、pH和氨。乳果糖培养5天后,双歧杆菌和乳酸菌的数量增加,而大糖醇和双硫代醇没有观察到这一现象。结论:乳果糖在同一体外系统中具有益生元作用,而大糖醇和比沙可的作用则不同。在我们的研究中,我们研究了乳果糖、巨量糖醇和比沙酰在近端结肠体外模型TIM-2中的益生元效应。本研究结果表明,乳果糖与巨糖醇或双草酰相反,增加了短链脂肪酸的产量,并增加了双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌的数量,从而显示出益生元效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applications of Ezrin Peptide Therapy to Long COVID, Drug Resistant Infections, Chronic Inflammation and in the Support of Healthy Aging Disruptive Activity of Acetic Acid of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli O157 Biofilms Developed on Eggshells and Industrial Surfaces MMR Vaccine Provides Protective Immunity Severe SARS-coV-2 Infections Population Dynamics of Corn Bacterial Endophytes Development of Rapid Pre and Post Mortem On-farm Diagnostic Test Kit for Porcine Cysticercosis (Pork Tapeworm)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1