C. Driscoll, A. Békéssy, V. Bui, D. Fox, M. Harvey, D. Mackenzie
{"title":"Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: Clinical Implications of a Normative Investigation.","authors":"C. Driscoll, A. Békéssy, V. Bui, D. Fox, M. Harvey, D. Mackenzie","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.29.2.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) assessment may assist in the diagnosis of balance disorders. Currently, however, there are limited guidelines available for clinicians to maximise its application. This study aimed to develop procedures for ensuring reliable VEMP recordings in the clinical setting and to provide comprehensive normative data. VEMP responses from 30 normal adults were collected using the Biologic Navigator. The factors of stimulus type, frequency and intensity were considered. Only stimulus type had a significant effect on VEMP recordings, with responses from click stimuli having lower thresholds, shorter latencies and higher test-retest correlations than the tone burst stimuli. However, as the maximum click intensity of the system was 90 dB nHL, the click stimulus only elicited responses from 73.3% of ears. The results of this investigation, along with a review of the existing literature, have led to the creation of a clinical protocol for VEMP testing.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.29.2.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) assessment may assist in the diagnosis of balance disorders. Currently, however, there are limited guidelines available for clinicians to maximise its application. This study aimed to develop procedures for ensuring reliable VEMP recordings in the clinical setting and to provide comprehensive normative data. VEMP responses from 30 normal adults were collected using the Biologic Navigator. The factors of stimulus type, frequency and intensity were considered. Only stimulus type had a significant effect on VEMP recordings, with responses from click stimuli having lower thresholds, shorter latencies and higher test-retest correlations than the tone burst stimuli. However, as the maximum click intensity of the system was 90 dB nHL, the click stimulus only elicited responses from 73.3% of ears. The results of this investigation, along with a review of the existing literature, have led to the creation of a clinical protocol for VEMP testing.
前庭诱发肌电位(VEMP)评估可能有助于平衡障碍的诊断。然而,目前,临床医生能够最大限度地利用其应用的指导方针有限。本研究旨在制定确保临床环境中可靠的VEMP记录的程序,并提供全面的规范数据。使用生物导航仪收集30名正常成年人的VEMP反应。考虑了刺激类型、频率和强度等因素。只有刺激类型对VEMP记录有显著影响,与音调刺激相比,点击刺激的反应具有较低的阈值,较短的潜伏期和较高的测试-重测试相关性。然而,由于系统的最大点击强度为90 dB nHL,点击刺激仅引起73.3%的耳朵的反应。这项调查的结果,以及对现有文献的回顾,导致了VEMP测试的临床方案的创建。