Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Candida Species in Affirm VPIII, Papanicolaou Smear Test and Gram Stain

K. Kim, Tae-Hyoung Kim, Jun Hyung Lee, Tae Jin Lee, Mi-Kyung Lee
{"title":"Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Candida Species in Affirm VPIII, Papanicolaou Smear Test and Gram Stain","authors":"K. Kim, Tae-Hyoung Kim, Jun Hyung Lee, Tae Jin Lee, Mi-Kyung Lee","doi":"10.5145/KJCM.2012.15.3.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infectious vaginitis is caused primarily by three different groups of microbial pathogens (Trichomonas vaginalis, Candida spp., and Gardnerella vaginalis). The objective of this study was to compare the Affirm VPIII assay using a DNA hybridization technique with the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test and the Gram stain in the detection and identification of these three organisms. Methods: A total of 300 vaginal samples were collected from women that were either symptomatic for vaginitis or asymptomatic women that were being seen for routine obstetric or gynecological care. The presence of T. vaginalis, Candida spp., and G. vaginalis was evaluated by using the Affirm VIII assay (Becton Dickinson, USA), Pap smear test, and Gram stain method, respectively. Results: With the Affirm VPIII assay, 1 (0.3%) patient tested positive for T. vaginalis, 99 (33.0%) patients were positive for G vaginalis, and 18 (6.0%) were positive for Candida spp. The detection rates of Trichomonas infection, bacterial vaginosis and candidiasis by the Pap smear test and Gram stain method were 0.7% versus 0%, 16.3% versus 35.7%, and 1.7% versus 9.7%, respectively. The differences between the detection rates of the above three organisms between the Pap smear test and the Gram stain method were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The Affirm VPIII assay was more sensitive than the Pap smear test and more specific than the Gram stain method for the detection and identification of these three organisms. In addition, the results of the Affirm VPIII assay are quick to obtain and are simple and easy to interpret. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2012;15:104-109)","PeriodicalId":143093,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2012.15.3.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Infectious vaginitis is caused primarily by three different groups of microbial pathogens (Trichomonas vaginalis, Candida spp., and Gardnerella vaginalis). The objective of this study was to compare the Affirm VPIII assay using a DNA hybridization technique with the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test and the Gram stain in the detection and identification of these three organisms. Methods: A total of 300 vaginal samples were collected from women that were either symptomatic for vaginitis or asymptomatic women that were being seen for routine obstetric or gynecological care. The presence of T. vaginalis, Candida spp., and G. vaginalis was evaluated by using the Affirm VIII assay (Becton Dickinson, USA), Pap smear test, and Gram stain method, respectively. Results: With the Affirm VPIII assay, 1 (0.3%) patient tested positive for T. vaginalis, 99 (33.0%) patients were positive for G vaginalis, and 18 (6.0%) were positive for Candida spp. The detection rates of Trichomonas infection, bacterial vaginosis and candidiasis by the Pap smear test and Gram stain method were 0.7% versus 0%, 16.3% versus 35.7%, and 1.7% versus 9.7%, respectively. The differences between the detection rates of the above three organisms between the Pap smear test and the Gram stain method were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The Affirm VPIII assay was more sensitive than the Pap smear test and more specific than the Gram stain method for the detection and identification of these three organisms. In addition, the results of the Affirm VPIII assay are quick to obtain and are simple and easy to interpret. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2012;15:104-109)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道毛滴虫、阴道加德纳菌和念珠菌在确认型VPIII、巴氏涂片试验和革兰氏染色中的检测
背景:感染性阴道炎主要由三种不同的微生物病原体(阴道毛滴虫、念珠菌和阴道加德纳菌)引起。本研究的目的是比较使用DNA杂交技术的Affirm VPIII测定法与巴氏涂片试验和革兰氏染色法在检测和鉴定这三种生物体方面的作用。方法:从有阴道炎症状的妇女或接受常规产科或妇科护理的无症状妇女中收集阴道样本共300份。分别采用美国Becton Dickinson公司的Affirm VIII法、巴氏涂片法和革兰氏染色法检测阴道念珠菌、念珠菌和阴道念珠菌的存在。结果:Affirm VPIII检测阴道滴虫阳性1例(0.3%),G阴道滴虫阳性99例(33.0%),念珠菌阳性18例(6.0%),巴氏涂片法和革兰氏染色法对滴虫感染、细菌性阴道病和念珠菌病的检出率分别为0.7%对0%、16.3%对35.7%、1.7%对9.7%。巴氏涂片检查与革兰氏染色法对上述3种微生物的检出率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:Affirm VPIII法对这三种微生物的检测和鉴定灵敏度高于巴氏涂片法,特异性高于革兰氏染色法。此外,Affirm VPIII测定的结果可以快速获得,并且简单易于解释。(韩国临床微生物杂志2012;15:104-109)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity of Integrons Carrying blaVIM-2 Cassette in Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. A Case of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Caused by Arcanobacterium haemolyticum and Streptococcus agalactiae Haemophilus parainfluenzae Infective Endocarditis Confirmed by 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis from Culture Negative Tissue An Unusual Feature of Malaria: Exflagellated Microgametes of Malarial Parasites in Human Peripheral Blood Lung Abscess and Bacteremia Caused by Neisseria flavescens and Streptococcus sanguis in Patient with Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1