Hybrid Multi-rate Multipath Routing (HMMR) protocol

Elsa Baby, K. Senthilkumar
{"title":"Hybrid Multi-rate Multipath Routing (HMMR) protocol","authors":"Elsa Baby, K. Senthilkumar","doi":"10.1109/ICACCS.2016.7586344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multipath on demand routing protocols perform better than single path routing protocols under mobility conditions due to the availability of alternate paths reducing route discovery frequency and routing overhead. However all these routing protocols use minimum hop count as the routing metric to discover shortest path from source to the destination. With the advent of multi-rate wireless standards such as IEEE 802.11 a/b/g, use of minimum hop count as routing metric results in under utilization of available bandwidth. This paper proposes an hybrid multi-rate multipath routing protocol based on AOMDV. The proposed routing scheme uses SNR of a link to identify its transmission rate and assigns a link cost based on the measured transmission rate. Route with less path cost (cumulative link cost) is chosen as the best path. Simulations are carried out in Qualnet. The simulation result shows that the proposed routing scheme performs better than AOMDV in terms of throughput, delay, packet delivery and routing overhead.","PeriodicalId":176803,"journal":{"name":"2016 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS.2016.7586344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Multipath on demand routing protocols perform better than single path routing protocols under mobility conditions due to the availability of alternate paths reducing route discovery frequency and routing overhead. However all these routing protocols use minimum hop count as the routing metric to discover shortest path from source to the destination. With the advent of multi-rate wireless standards such as IEEE 802.11 a/b/g, use of minimum hop count as routing metric results in under utilization of available bandwidth. This paper proposes an hybrid multi-rate multipath routing protocol based on AOMDV. The proposed routing scheme uses SNR of a link to identify its transmission rate and assigns a link cost based on the measured transmission rate. Route with less path cost (cumulative link cost) is chosen as the best path. Simulations are carried out in Qualnet. The simulation result shows that the proposed routing scheme performs better than AOMDV in terms of throughput, delay, packet delivery and routing overhead.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合多速率多路径路由(HMMR)协议
多路径随需应变路由协议在可移动性条件下比单路径路由协议性能更好,因为可选路径的可用性降低了路由发现频率和路由开销。然而,所有这些路由协议都使用最小跳数作为路由度量来发现从源到目的的最短路径。随着IEEE 802.11 a/b/g等多速率无线标准的出现,使用最小跳数作为路由度量导致可用带宽利用率不足。提出了一种基于AOMDV的混合多速率多径路由协议。该路由方案使用链路的信噪比来识别其传输速率,并根据测量的传输速率分配链路开销。选择路径开销(累积链路开销)较小的路由作为最佳路径。在Qualnet中进行了仿真。仿真结果表明,该路由方案在吞吐量、时延、分组传输和路由开销等方面都优于AOMDV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detection of selfish Nodes in MANET - a survey Robust Sybil attack detection mechanism for Social Networks - a survey A comparative study of DFT and Moving Window Averaging technique of current differential protection on Transmission line Online review analytics using word alignment model on Twitter data Hybrid cryptography mechanism for securing self-organized wireless networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1