Pattern Matching Based Metric for Recommending Ordered Items

Md. Mustafizur Rahman, Zanifer Afsana Stephi, Moqsadur Rahman
{"title":"Pattern Matching Based Metric for Recommending Ordered Items","authors":"Md. Mustafizur Rahman, Zanifer Afsana Stephi, Moqsadur Rahman","doi":"10.1109/ICEEE54059.2021.9718931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, we all know that the Recommendation System is essential. Our lives are continuously impacted by the Recommendation System. Its main objective is to suggest a relevant item or item list as per the user’s requirement. In many cases, it recommends the user’s desired item or item list based on rating prediction, and this prediction accuracy is considered to be the system’s actual accuracy. But can the rating prediction accuracy be considered the system’s true accuracy in ordered items prediction? Rating prediction system even after predicting a near-exact rating, there could be a difference between the actual item list and the predicted item list. We attempted to find answers to these issues by working with the College Recommendation System. We have used different machine learning-based models in our work for rating prediction. And we have measured the correlation between the actual item list and the predicted item list using the Longest Common Subsequence algorithm. Our analysis showed that the rating prediction accuracy does not always reflect the system’s actual accuracy in the scenario of ordered items prediction. The accuracy of the system should be verified by how closely the predicted item list matches the actual item list when recommending ordered items. A pattern-matching algorithm like - Longest Common Subsequence can be considered as an accuracy metric in this context.","PeriodicalId":188366,"journal":{"name":"2021 3rd International Conference on Electrical & Electronic Engineering (ICEEE)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 3rd International Conference on Electrical & Electronic Engineering (ICEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEE54059.2021.9718931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At present, we all know that the Recommendation System is essential. Our lives are continuously impacted by the Recommendation System. Its main objective is to suggest a relevant item or item list as per the user’s requirement. In many cases, it recommends the user’s desired item or item list based on rating prediction, and this prediction accuracy is considered to be the system’s actual accuracy. But can the rating prediction accuracy be considered the system’s true accuracy in ordered items prediction? Rating prediction system even after predicting a near-exact rating, there could be a difference between the actual item list and the predicted item list. We attempted to find answers to these issues by working with the College Recommendation System. We have used different machine learning-based models in our work for rating prediction. And we have measured the correlation between the actual item list and the predicted item list using the Longest Common Subsequence algorithm. Our analysis showed that the rating prediction accuracy does not always reflect the system’s actual accuracy in the scenario of ordered items prediction. The accuracy of the system should be verified by how closely the predicted item list matches the actual item list when recommending ordered items. A pattern-matching algorithm like - Longest Common Subsequence can be considered as an accuracy metric in this context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模式匹配的订购商品推荐度量
目前,我们都知道推荐系统是必不可少的。我们的生活不断受到推荐系统的影响。它的主要目标是根据用户的需求推荐一个相关的项目或项目列表。在很多情况下,它会根据评级预测来推荐用户想要的物品或物品列表,这种预测精度被认为是系统的实际精度。但是,评级预测的准确性是否可以视为系统在订购物品预测中的真实准确性?评分预测系统即使在预测出接近准确的评分后,实际的物品列表和预测的物品列表之间也可能存在差异。我们试图通过与大学推荐系统合作来找到这些问题的答案。在我们的工作中,我们使用了不同的基于机器学习的模型进行评级预测。我们使用最长公共子序列算法测量了实际项目列表和预测项目列表之间的相关性。我们的分析表明,评级预测精度并不总是反映系统的实际准确度在订购物品的预测场景。系统的准确性应该通过在推荐订购商品时预测的商品列表与实际商品列表的匹配程度来验证。在这种情况下,像最长公共子序列这样的模式匹配算法可以被视为精度度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computer-Aided Polyp Removal Detection in Endoscopic Images FPGA based Histogram Equalization for Image Processing Spreading Loss Model for Channel Characterization of Future 6G Terahertz Communication Networks Impact of Cladding Rectangular Bars on the Antiresonant Hollow Core Fiber Predicting Autism Spectrum Disorder Based On Gender Using Machine Learning Techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1