Software project measurement criteria

I. Hampton, B. Quinn
{"title":"Software project measurement criteria","authors":"I. Hampton, B. Quinn","doi":"10.1109/APAQ.2000.883799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consensus of opinion of a sample of Mass Transit Railway Corporation (MTRC) management and engineering staff is that projects containing software products have proved difficult to deliver to programme and within budget. This fact is further exasperated when a particular supplier does not subscribe to a \"mature\" software development process (SDP), thereby failing to either sustain consistency in the application or provide the client with visibility of progress throughout the development and manufacturing process. The introduction of standard SDPs has recently become an integral part of many contract specifications. This development has provided a defined measure of visibility of the SDP to the client. Software is of a nebulous composition, as opposed to being a physical commodity which can be visibly \"measured\". The quality of the software product is therefore deemed analogous to the processes adopted during production. The result is that the SDP can be ameliorated to formulate a framework for establishing a robust set of measurement criteria. This paper describes the approach adopted by MTRC in measuring the progress of a safety-related software-intensive development project. It should be noted however, that the exercise described in this paper is not constrained to software development, and the methodology can be adapted to measure any phase, element or activity of any project.","PeriodicalId":432680,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings First Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings First Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APAQ.2000.883799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The consensus of opinion of a sample of Mass Transit Railway Corporation (MTRC) management and engineering staff is that projects containing software products have proved difficult to deliver to programme and within budget. This fact is further exasperated when a particular supplier does not subscribe to a "mature" software development process (SDP), thereby failing to either sustain consistency in the application or provide the client with visibility of progress throughout the development and manufacturing process. The introduction of standard SDPs has recently become an integral part of many contract specifications. This development has provided a defined measure of visibility of the SDP to the client. Software is of a nebulous composition, as opposed to being a physical commodity which can be visibly "measured". The quality of the software product is therefore deemed analogous to the processes adopted during production. The result is that the SDP can be ameliorated to formulate a framework for establishing a robust set of measurement criteria. This paper describes the approach adopted by MTRC in measuring the progress of a safety-related software-intensive development project. It should be noted however, that the exercise described in this paper is not constrained to software development, and the methodology can be adapted to measure any phase, element or activity of any project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件项目度量标准
香港轨道交通公司(港铁)管理层及工程人员的调查结果显示,包含软件产品的项目难以按计划及在预算内交付。当一个特定的供应商没有订阅“成熟的”软件开发过程(SDP),从而无法维持应用程序的一致性,或者无法向客户提供整个开发和制造过程的可见性时,这一事实就更加恶化了。标准sdp的引入最近已成为许多合同规范的组成部分。该开发为客户端提供了SDP可见性的定义度量。软件是一种模糊的组合,而不是一种有形的商品,可以明显地“测量”。因此,软件产品的质量被认为类似于生产过程中所采用的过程。结果是,可以改进SDP,以制定一个框架,以建立一套稳健的测量标准。本文介绍港铁在量度与安全有关的软件密集发展计划的进度时所采用的方法。然而,应该注意的是,本文中描述的练习并不局限于软件开发,并且该方法可以用于度量任何项目的任何阶段、元素或活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Testing for imperfect integration of legacy software components A framework for quantifying error proneness in software An object-oriented web test model for testing Web applications A formal mechanism for assessing polymorphism in object-oriented systems Control of nondeterminism in testing distributed multithreaded programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1