Too tense for candy crush: affect influences user engagement with proactively suggested content

Kostadin Kushlev, Bruno Cardoso, M. Pielot
{"title":"Too tense for candy crush: affect influences user engagement with proactively suggested content","authors":"Kostadin Kushlev, Bruno Cardoso, M. Pielot","doi":"10.1145/3098279.3098569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Push notifications are increasingly being used to engage users with app content. In the present research, we propose that users' current affect (i.e., how they are feeling) should be a critical---yet underexplored---factor in user engagement. Participants (N = 337) downloaded a custom-developed app that delivered notifications. After attending to a notification (N = 32,704), participants reported how they felt and chose whether to engage with further content; they could choose between mentally demanding or simple/diverting tasks. When feeling good, people were less likely to engage with mentally demanding tasks. When feeling calm, people were more likely to engage with diverting tasks. When feeling energetic, people were less likely to respond to distractions altogether. These findings provide a tantalizing first glimpse into how affect predicts the kind of content users choose to engage with, paving the way for the use of affect in the design of notification systems.","PeriodicalId":120153,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Push notifications are increasingly being used to engage users with app content. In the present research, we propose that users' current affect (i.e., how they are feeling) should be a critical---yet underexplored---factor in user engagement. Participants (N = 337) downloaded a custom-developed app that delivered notifications. After attending to a notification (N = 32,704), participants reported how they felt and chose whether to engage with further content; they could choose between mentally demanding or simple/diverting tasks. When feeling good, people were less likely to engage with mentally demanding tasks. When feeling calm, people were more likely to engage with diverting tasks. When feeling energetic, people were less likely to respond to distractions altogether. These findings provide a tantalizing first glimpse into how affect predicts the kind of content users choose to engage with, paving the way for the use of affect in the design of notification systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对《糖果粉碎传奇》来说过于紧张:affect会通过主动建议的内容影响用户粘性
推送通知越来越多地被用于吸引用户使用应用内容。在目前的研究中,我们建议用户的当前影响(即他们的感受)应该是影响用户粘性的关键因素。参与者(N = 337)下载了一个定制的应用程序来发送通知。在参加通知(N = 32,704)后,参与者报告他们的感受并选择是否参与进一步的内容;他们可以在脑力要求高的任务和简单/转移注意力的任务之间做出选择。当感觉良好时,人们不太可能参与需要脑力的任务。当感觉平静时,人们更有可能从事转移注意力的任务。当感觉精力充沛时,人们不太可能对分心的事情做出反应。这些发现让我们对影响如何预测用户选择参与的内容类型有了初步的了解,为在通知系统的设计中使用影响铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving pocket paint usability via material design compliance and internationalization & localization support on application level CapSoles: who is walking on what kind of floor? Exploring the feasibility of subliminal priming on smartphones Visual, auditory and haptic navigation feedbacks among older pedestrians Usability of different types of commercial selfie sticks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1