New Correlations for Critical and Subcritical Two-Phase Flow Through Surface Chokes in High-Rate Oil Wells

H. Al-Attar
{"title":"New Correlations for Critical and Subcritical Two-Phase Flow Through Surface Chokes in High-Rate Oil Wells","authors":"H. Al-Attar","doi":"10.2118/120788-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The critical and subcritical multiphase flow through wellhead restrictions of a prolific oil field in the Middle East is investigated, and two sets of new correlations are presented. The first set of correlations is developed by using 40 field tests representing critical flow conditions. The second set of correlations is based on 139 field tests representing subcritical flow conditions of gas/liquid mixtures through wellhead chokes. For the critical multiphase flow condition, the predicted oil flow rates by the new set of correlations are in excellent agreement with the measured ones. The absolute average percent difference (AAPD) is between 1.88 and 4.37, and the corresponding standard of deviation (SD) is between 2.52 and 6.52. These results are found to be statistically superior to those predicted by other published correlations considered in this work. During the subcritical gas/ liquid flow conditions through surface chokes, the accuracy of oil flow rates predicted by the new set of correlations seems to be sensitive to the type and size of the choke being used. For Cameron LD type and 144/64-in. choke, the oil flow rates predicted by the proposed correlation are superior to those predicted by other methods available in the literature, with AAPD of 8.5. However, for smaller choke sizes of 96/64 and 64/64 in., the oil flow rates predicted by the new correlations and other methods are found to be close to each other. For Cameron F type and 144/64-in. choke size, the oil flow rates predicted by the new correlation are closely matched by those predicted by other published methods, with AAPD of 13.7. For smaller choke sizes of 80/64 and 64/64 in., few field tests are available, and the predications of all methods, including the proposed ones, show similar statistical results. The above findings for Cameron F choke also seem to apply to beaned wellhead assemblies for this particular oil field.","PeriodicalId":335535,"journal":{"name":"Spe Projects Facilities & Construction","volume":"236 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spe Projects Facilities & Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/120788-PA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Summary The critical and subcritical multiphase flow through wellhead restrictions of a prolific oil field in the Middle East is investigated, and two sets of new correlations are presented. The first set of correlations is developed by using 40 field tests representing critical flow conditions. The second set of correlations is based on 139 field tests representing subcritical flow conditions of gas/liquid mixtures through wellhead chokes. For the critical multiphase flow condition, the predicted oil flow rates by the new set of correlations are in excellent agreement with the measured ones. The absolute average percent difference (AAPD) is between 1.88 and 4.37, and the corresponding standard of deviation (SD) is between 2.52 and 6.52. These results are found to be statistically superior to those predicted by other published correlations considered in this work. During the subcritical gas/ liquid flow conditions through surface chokes, the accuracy of oil flow rates predicted by the new set of correlations seems to be sensitive to the type and size of the choke being used. For Cameron LD type and 144/64-in. choke, the oil flow rates predicted by the proposed correlation are superior to those predicted by other methods available in the literature, with AAPD of 8.5. However, for smaller choke sizes of 96/64 and 64/64 in., the oil flow rates predicted by the new correlations and other methods are found to be close to each other. For Cameron F type and 144/64-in. choke size, the oil flow rates predicted by the new correlation are closely matched by those predicted by other published methods, with AAPD of 13.7. For smaller choke sizes of 80/64 and 64/64 in., few field tests are available, and the predications of all methods, including the proposed ones, show similar statistical results. The above findings for Cameron F choke also seem to apply to beaned wellhead assemblies for this particular oil field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高产量油井临界和亚临界两相流通过地面扼流圈的新关系式
研究了中东某高产油田井口限制下的临界和亚临界多相流,提出了两组新的关联关系。第一组相关性是通过使用40个代表临界流动条件的现场试验得出的。第二组相关性基于139个现场测试,这些测试代表了气/液混合物通过井口扼流圈的亚临界流动条件。在临界多相流条件下,用该关系式预测的油流量与实测值吻合较好。绝对平均百分比差(AAPD)在1.88 ~ 4.37之间,相应的标准差(SD)在2.52 ~ 6.52之间。这些结果在统计上优于本工作中考虑的其他已发表相关性预测的结果。在亚临界气体/液体流过地面扼流圈的情况下,由新关联集预测的油流量的准确性似乎对所使用的扼流圈的类型和尺寸很敏感。适用于卡梅隆LD型和144/64英寸。结果表明,该方法预测的油流量优于文献中其他方法预测的油流量,AAPD为8.5。然而,对于96/64和64/64英寸的较小节流孔尺寸,结果表明,新关联法预测的油流量与其他方法预测的油流量基本一致。适用于卡梅隆F型和144/64英寸。根据新的相关性预测的节流口尺寸、油流量与其他已发表方法的预测结果非常吻合,AAPD为13.7。对于较小的节流孔尺寸,如80/64和64/64 in。在美国,现场试验很少,所有方法的预测,包括提出的方法,都显示出相似的统计结果。Cameron F节流阀的上述发现似乎也适用于该油田的固定井口组件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Carbon Sequestration From Waste Through Conversion to Charcoal: Equipment for a Small-Scale Operation A New Proprietary Hybrid-Solvent Process for Improved Mercaptan Removal Development of Simple-To-Use Predictive Tool for Rapid Prediction of n-Alkanes Surface Tension Estimation of Potential Precipitation From an Equilibrated Calcium Carbonate Aqueous Phase Using Simple Predictive Tool Boosting Energy Efficiency Using Waste-Heat-Powered Absorption Chillers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1