Enumeration Of Bifidobacterium Spp., Lactobacillus Acidophilus and Starter Cultures from Commercial Probiotic Yogurts and Freeze-Dried Yogurt Starter Mixes

Talha Demirci
{"title":"Enumeration Of Bifidobacterium Spp., Lactobacillus Acidophilus and Starter Cultures from Commercial Probiotic Yogurts and Freeze-Dried Yogurt Starter Mixes","authors":"Talha Demirci","doi":"10.15316/sjafs.2022.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probiotic yogurt is a popular functional food to deliver of probiotic cells for the health-enhancing effects worldwide. The viability of probiotics in yogurt before consumption is the most important factor to providing desired effects, however, probiotic microorganisms have occasionally inadequate viability in marketable food products. In this current study, Bifidobacterium spp., L. acidophilus and yoghurt starter bacteria enumerations were made in commercial probiotic yoghurt and freeze-dried yogurt mixes. RCA 5.3 and MRS 5.2 media were used for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus counting, ST Agar and M17 Agar were used for Stretococcus thermophilus counts. While using MRS-Bile Agar and RCA-Clindamycin Agar for L. acidophilus enumeration, Bifidobacterium spp. counts were performed using MRS-NNLP medium. 5 out of yoghurt samples (A, C, D, and E) did not reveal satisfactory recovery (< 5 log CFU/g) for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus colonies on MRS 5.2 Agar while L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus colony counts on RCA 5.3 Agar below 5 log CFU/g for same tested 4 samples (A, C, D, and E). The recovery rates over 9 log CFU/g were obtained in the enumerations made for all yogurt samples on both ST and M17 media. The problem of insufficient recovery rates that occurred for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in some yogurt samples was not valid for S. thermophilus. This work indicated that high amounts of L. acidophilus were detected on both media in both of the two yoghurt samples declared as L. acidophilus on the label (F and G). On the other hand, bifidobacteria was determined above 5 log CFU/g in only 1 yoghurt sample (B) out of 7 probiotic yoghurts claimed to be Bifidobacterium spp. This study reveals relevant information on probiotic and starter counts of commercial probiotic yogurts in Turkey and discusses in detail the possible reasons for the results obtained.\n","PeriodicalId":125980,"journal":{"name":"Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15316/sjafs.2022.056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Probiotic yogurt is a popular functional food to deliver of probiotic cells for the health-enhancing effects worldwide. The viability of probiotics in yogurt before consumption is the most important factor to providing desired effects, however, probiotic microorganisms have occasionally inadequate viability in marketable food products. In this current study, Bifidobacterium spp., L. acidophilus and yoghurt starter bacteria enumerations were made in commercial probiotic yoghurt and freeze-dried yogurt mixes. RCA 5.3 and MRS 5.2 media were used for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus counting, ST Agar and M17 Agar were used for Stretococcus thermophilus counts. While using MRS-Bile Agar and RCA-Clindamycin Agar for L. acidophilus enumeration, Bifidobacterium spp. counts were performed using MRS-NNLP medium. 5 out of yoghurt samples (A, C, D, and E) did not reveal satisfactory recovery (< 5 log CFU/g) for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus colonies on MRS 5.2 Agar while L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus colony counts on RCA 5.3 Agar below 5 log CFU/g for same tested 4 samples (A, C, D, and E). The recovery rates over 9 log CFU/g were obtained in the enumerations made for all yogurt samples on both ST and M17 media. The problem of insufficient recovery rates that occurred for L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus in some yogurt samples was not valid for S. thermophilus. This work indicated that high amounts of L. acidophilus were detected on both media in both of the two yoghurt samples declared as L. acidophilus on the label (F and G). On the other hand, bifidobacteria was determined above 5 log CFU/g in only 1 yoghurt sample (B) out of 7 probiotic yoghurts claimed to be Bifidobacterium spp. This study reveals relevant information on probiotic and starter counts of commercial probiotic yogurts in Turkey and discusses in detail the possible reasons for the results obtained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双歧杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌和商业益生菌酸奶及冻干酸奶发酵剂发酵剂的计数
益生菌酸奶是一种广受欢迎的提供益生菌细胞的功能性食品,具有增强健康的作用。酸奶食用前益生菌的活力是提供预期效果的最重要因素,然而,益生菌微生物在市场食品中偶尔存在活力不足的情况。本研究对商品益生菌酸奶和冻干酸奶混合物中双歧杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌和酸奶发酵菌进行了计数。德尔布鲁氏乳杆菌采用RCA 5.3和MRS 5.2培养基。采用ST琼脂和M17琼脂对嗜热链球菌进行计数。使用mrs -胆汁琼脂和rca -克林霉素琼脂进行嗜酸乳杆菌计数,使用MRS-NNLP培养基进行双歧杆菌计数。5份酸奶样品(A、C、D和E)对delbrueckii乳杆菌的回收率不理想(< 5 log CFU/g)。保加利亚乳杆菌在MRS 5.2琼脂上的菌落;同样测试的4个样品(A、C、D和E),在RCA 5.3琼脂上的保加利亚菌菌落计数低于5 log CFU/g。在ST和M17培养基上对所有酸奶样品进行计数,回收率均超过9 log CFU/g。德尔布鲁氏乳杆菌亚种出现的回收率不足问题。部分酸奶样品中的保加利亚菌对嗜热链球菌无效。这项工作表明,在标签(F和G)上声明为嗜酸乳杆菌的两种酸奶样品的两种培养基上都检测到大量的嗜酸乳杆菌。在7种声称为双歧杆菌的益生菌酸奶中,只有1种酸奶样品(B)的双歧杆菌含量超过5 log CFU/g。本研究揭示了土耳其商品益生菌酸奶中益生菌和发酵剂数量的相关信息,并详细讨论了得出该结果的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
General Characteristics of Konya Agricultural Machinery Manufacturing Industry Forage Pea Pure Lines: Winter Hardiness, High Seed and Biological Yield Germination Parameters of Different Types of Black Carrot Seeds of Ereğli Local Population The Effect of Some Plant Growth Regulators on Callus Culture of Different Pistachio Varieties Effect of Organo Mineral Fertilization on Weed Infestation and Dynamic in Upland Rice Growth in the Southern Sudanian Zone of Burkina Faso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1