Racism in the 21st Century: Debbie Tucker Green’s Eye for Ear

Belgin Bağırlar
{"title":"Racism in the 21st Century: Debbie Tucker Green’s Eye for Ear","authors":"Belgin Bağırlar","doi":"10.33422/EJBS.V3I3.483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does equality exist in the 21st century, or, are minorities still forced to fight for equality? In nineteenth century, Britain, racism was blatant in all spheres of cultural, social, and economic life to the point that it crossed over into literature and theatre. In 1978, UNESCO adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Forty years have since passed, but has it made any difference? Contemporary British playwright Debbie Tucker Green’s Eye for Ear (2018), staged at the Royal Court Theatre, reminds us that racism and inequality is still a key social-political issue. This three-act, avant-garde, colloquial play depicts how both African-Americans as well as Black British people still live with racism today. It also highlights racism’s linguistic and legal past. Tucker Green particularly focuses on the violent aspect of that racism through the lens of different characters: an academic, a black student, a black boy, and black parents. The play concludes with crushed hope, for it deduces that Caucasians both in the United States and in Great Britain still dominate practically every facet of society. This study will examine Green’s Ear for Eye, racial discrimination in the 21st century, and how Tucker Green projects her views upon her work through the theory of race and racism.","PeriodicalId":293336,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavioral Sciences","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/EJBS.V3I3.483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does equality exist in the 21st century, or, are minorities still forced to fight for equality? In nineteenth century, Britain, racism was blatant in all spheres of cultural, social, and economic life to the point that it crossed over into literature and theatre. In 1978, UNESCO adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Forty years have since passed, but has it made any difference? Contemporary British playwright Debbie Tucker Green’s Eye for Ear (2018), staged at the Royal Court Theatre, reminds us that racism and inequality is still a key social-political issue. This three-act, avant-garde, colloquial play depicts how both African-Americans as well as Black British people still live with racism today. It also highlights racism’s linguistic and legal past. Tucker Green particularly focuses on the violent aspect of that racism through the lens of different characters: an academic, a black student, a black boy, and black parents. The play concludes with crushed hope, for it deduces that Caucasians both in the United States and in Great Britain still dominate practically every facet of society. This study will examine Green’s Ear for Eye, racial discrimination in the 21st century, and how Tucker Green projects her views upon her work through the theory of race and racism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《21世纪的种族主义:黛比·塔克·格林的眼换耳
平等在21世纪还存在吗?或者,少数民族仍然被迫为平等而斗争吗?在19世纪的英国,种族主义在文化、社会和经济生活的各个领域都是明目张心的,甚至蔓延到了文学和戏剧领域。1978年,联合国教科文组织通过了《世界人权宣言》。40年过去了,但有什么不同吗?英国当代剧作家黛比·塔克·格林的《以眼还耳》(2018)在皇家宫廷剧院上演,提醒我们种族主义和不平等仍然是一个关键的社会政治问题。这部三幕前卫的口语化戏剧描绘了非裔美国人和英国黑人今天仍然生活在种族主义之中。它还突出了种族主义在语言和法律上的历史。塔克·格林特别关注种族主义的暴力方面,通过不同角色的镜头:一个学者,一个黑人学生,一个黑人男孩和黑人父母。该剧以破灭的希望结束,因为它推断出美国和英国的白种人仍然几乎支配着社会的方方面面。本研究将考察格林的《以眼还眼》,21世纪的种族歧视,以及塔克·格林如何通过种族和种族主义理论将她的观点投射到她的作品中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Cancel Culture Affect the Bottom Line? A Timeseries Analysis of Sentiment and Emotion on the Efficacy of the Call to Cancel Against Abercrombie & Fitch Social Construct of Masculinity Towards Mental Health: A Literature Review Screen Exposure and Child Development: A Contextual Analysis of Pandemic Personality, Sexuality, and Beauty Standards: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Canadian and German Women's Cosmetic Surgery Behaviours and Attitudes Using Promotional Strategies to Increase the Use of Miswak among Teenagers in Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1